preview

Their Eyes Were Watching God Analysis

Decent Essays

Richard Wright and Alain Locke’s critique on Zora Neale Hurston’s novel Their Eyes Were Watching God reveal the common notion held by many of the time, and still today, that there is a right and wrong way for a black person to talk and to act. Wright’s point of view of clearly racially charged and coming from a place of ignorance and intolerance. While, Locke’s point is simply due to a lack of an ability to think out of the box and observe deeper meaning, perhaps due to internalized oppression and a fearful desire to talk and act just like a white man in order to be taken seriously. Wright’s argument that the novel has no central theme and is parallel to minstrel shows, and Locke’s belief that Hurston uses relatable language to avoid diving into mature writing, are inherently wrong and fueled by the very issues Hurston was trying to combat: racism and sexism. Wright argues that Their Eyes Were Watching God has no central theme or significance, which is interesting considering it is now looked at as one of the most influential works of the twentieth century. The greatest, most revolutionary artists throughout history, think Van Gogh, have always been deemed lazy or untalented due primarily to social conventions of their time refusing to budge. However, what is truly unintelligent and lazy is Wright’s unwillingness to admit the abundance of important, ground breaking them throughout this novel. Their Eyes Were Watching God combats issues of racism, sexism, classism, and

Get Access