Ambition has always been described as a double-edged sword. It is loved and feared by many people, because it provides motivations and chances of being successful, however, when ambition gets too overwhelming, it will eventually lead to destruction. Ambition is the origin of all civilizations. When the seed of ambition is planted, the end of an era is only just the beginning, and the rise of a new age is just a matter of time. William Shakespeare’s play Hamlet and Robert Davies’s novel Fifth Business share some commonalities and differences. Both book and play have characters who strive for power and ambition. Hamlet in the play Hamlet and Percy Boy Staunton in Fifth Business clearly show the consequences of being overambitious. They all end …show more content…
In the play Hamlet, this loss of moral compass and the happening of the bad deeds are shown through a main character called Hamlet. In the play, Hamlet’s personal ambition is to avenge for his father King Hamlet who is killed by his uncle Claudius. Due to many unpredictable events and his personal imperfections, he is unable to kill his uncle, therefore, he starts to become nervous and his ambition engulfs him. This personal corruption is shown when he accidentally kills Polonius, a chamberlain who works for Claudius. “Mad as the sea and wind when both contend which is the mightier. In his lawless fit, behind the arras hearing something stir,whips out his rapier, cries 'A rat, a rat,'And in this brainish apprehension, kills the unseen good old man. (4.1.6-12) This quote reveals his condition that he is completely corrupted by his personal ambition and he starts to hurting other people around him to reach his demand. In addition, when he is overwhelmed, he loses his moral compass and sane, to a point that he starts harming people who are close to him. “Let me be cruel, not unnatural: I will speak daggers to her, but use none” (3.2 388-89). In this quote, he decides to use his words as a dagger when he talks to his mom. Even though his …show more content…
People will start detaching any connections involving them, whether it is voluntarily or otherwise. This occurs to Hamlet many times in the play, where he is isolated due to his ambition. In the play, Hamlet experiences many betrayals that leave him segregated. For example, Hamlet has two childhood friends Guildenstern and Rosencrantz, they are very dear to Hamlet. Yet, no matter how dear they are to him, they still choose to betray Hamlet when the king Claudius commands them to spy on Hamlet, for Claudius has already sensed Hamlet’s ambition. “But we both obey, and here give up ourselves, in the full bent, to lay out service freely at you feet to be commanded.” (2.2.29-32) This leaves Hamlet stranded on his road to vengeance. In addition, when his beloved father king Hamlet dies, he needs comfort and care from his loved one, however, his mother Queen Gertrude remarries Claudius and betrays his former husband in less than two months, this is another shock to Hamlet. “Let me not think on’t; frailty thy name is woman! A little month, or ere those shoes were old with which she follow’d my poor father’s body, like Niobe, all tears:-Why she, even she, O god, a beast that wants discourse of reason would have mourn’d longer.” (1.2.146-51) Not only she does not give support to Hamlet, she severs the only strand of hope that Hamlet holds, making him
In William Shakespeare’s play, Hamlet, the playwright introduces the compelling, complex, and complicated character of the Prince of Denmark, Hamlet. In the events of the play, Hamlet swears revenge against his uncle for the foul murder of his father, the king. However, despite his intense catalyst, Hamlet reveals to be continuously torn between his motive of revenge and conflicted conscience, generating an inability to carry out his desired actions. While Hamlet possesses the passion and intellect to murder his uncle, Claudius, his actual inclination to act upon the murder directly opposes that of his powerfully emotional contemplations (S.T. Coleridge). Hamlet’s overzealous thoughts become unrealistic compared to his actual endeavors throughout the play.
Hamlet, unlike Fortinbras and Laertes, did not follow what his advisor told him without questioning why he should take the advice. As time passes, Hamlet still has not acted out the revenge he promised his father. Out of disgust for his irreverence for his father he says, ?why, what an ass am I! This is most brave, that I, the son of a dear father murdered, prompted to my revenge by heaven and hell, must like a whore, unpack my heart with words and fall a-cursing like a very drab? (II.ii.594-598). This statement prompts one to believe Hamlet has been convinced by his father?s words to act, but does not want to do so hastily. Hamlet questions the validity of his revenge by devising a plan to provide evidence of King Claudius? guilt. Hamlet took advantage of his position at the local theater by instructing his actors
Comparing the novel Fifth Business by Robertson Davies and the play Hamlet by William Shakespeare, it is clear that both main characters place power and personal ambition above all else. Throughout the novel and the play readers are able to experience, what happens to Percy Boyd Staunton and Claudius as they place power and their own personal ambitions above all else. When characters place power and personal ambition above all, they become more distant from loved ones, lose the ones they love the most and end up murdered because they did what was necessary to gain power.
Hamlet is as much a story of emotional conflict, paranoia, and self-doubt as it is one of revenge and tragedy. The protagonist, Prince Hamlet of Denmark, is instructed by his slain father’s ghost to enact vengeance upon his uncle Claudius, whose treacherous murder of Hamlet’s father gave way to his rise to power. Overcome by anguish and obligation to avenge his father’s death, Hamlet ultimately commits a number of killings throughout the story. However, we are not to view the character Hamlet as a sick individual, but rather one who has been victimized by his own circumstances.
While Hamlet cleverly deceives others by appearing to be mad in order to conceal his inner thoughts, Polonius deceives others by giving supposedly “wise”advice that is countered by his actions, revealing that Hamlet and Polonius’ each separate themselves from their society. After late Hamlet’s ghost instructs Hamlet to avenge his murder, Hamlet declares that he will feign madness by acting “strange or odd some’er I bear myself” to create separation between his emotional state of a murderer to his own (Shakespeare 1.5 171). Hamlet’s plan of “an antic disposition” reveals Hamlet’s careful reasoning for concealing the murder for the crown, so that his soul remains unaffected by his revenge, characterizes Hamlet as thoughtful and cautious with his strategy (1.5 173). In doing so, Hamlet also provides a justification to the people of Denmark for acting irrationally, avoiding tainting his reputation, as the people perceive “mad Hamlet” as different from the prince Hamlet before Claudius’ rule. However, underneath Hamlet’s careful thinking and promise to himself for “holding his tongue,” Hamlet reflects upon his feelings of self disgust, in feeling “like a whore” or “a stallion,” that resulted as a consequence to his deception (2.2 547). Although Hamlet maintains an outward appearance of madness by deceiving
In this case, Hamlet is obsessed with yet unable to act out his revenge since he is a man of thought and reflection, not of action and impulsiveness. "Revenge, said Francis Bacon in his essay on the subject, is a kind of wild justice, and something in Hamlet is too civilized for stealthy murder," says Northrop Frye (Frye). While he knows it is his duty to avenge his father's murder, Hamlet's desire to fulfill this obligation constantly wavers. In self-pity he cries, "O cursed spite / That ever I was born to set it right!" (1.5. 188-189), and yet in rage he utters, "Now could I drink hot blood / and do such bitter business as the day / Would quake to loot on," (3.2. 397-399). Hamlet hesitates numerous times to fulfill his duty to avenge his father, and in the end he must actually convince himself to kill Claudius. "... I do not know / Why yet I live to say 'This thing's to do', / Sith I have cause, and will, and strength, and means / To do't... / ... / O, from this time forth, / My thoughts be bloody, or be nothing worth!" (4.4. 43-46, 65-66). This unusual flaw leads to Hamlet's inevitable demise, and is the most convincing evidence that Hamlet is, indeed, a tragedy. The protagonist, however, is not the only character in the play that experiences a want for revenge. Shakespeare uses all three of the sons seeking vengeance to reveal the complexity of the human yearning for
Throughout the play, Hamlet’s character is characterized both by periods of extreme caution and moments of impulsivity. One of the best examples of Hamlet’s heed can be found in Act 2, Scene 2 where he decides to have his theatre troupe perform his play, The Mousetrap. With this, Hamlet hopes that he will be able to “catch the conscience of the King,” by monitoring Claudius during the performance, that heavily mimics his murder of his brother, for signs of stress and guilt. While Hamlet was fully capable of bypassing this step by simply adhering to what he believes is the ghost of his father, Hamlet’s decision to unearth some sort of evidence that supports his father’s accusations is just one example of his cautious ways and need for certainty before action. However, such displays of caution find themselves juxtaposed with Hamlet’s bouts of impulsivity. One of the most telling illustrations of Hamlet’s rashness can be found in Act One, Scene Five, where he first conversing with the ghost of his father. Here, when the Ghost asks Hamlet to “revenge his foul and most unnatural murder,” Hamlet immediately agrees. In fact, within the next few lines Hamlet pledges he will “sweep to my revenge” with “wings as swift as meditation or the thoughts of love”. The fact that Hamlet coins this commitment to avenge his father’s murder without making much of any consideration of the possible repercussions of such an undertaking is one of the best representations of Hamlet’s impulsivity. This rash action, marked by a lack of extended over-analysis and internal debate, contrasts with the excessive caution Hamlet exhibits at many other points throughout the play. Ultimately, the interplay between Hamlet’s caution and impulsivity is one of the most notable juxtapositions of the play and serves to strongly steer the development, not only of
In Shakespeare’s play, Hamlet, Hamlet, a studious young man and Prince of Denmark, struggles to face the death of his father and the task to kill his father’s murderer, Claudius. He was once known as a charming, smart young man before his father’s death. However, Hamlet experiences depression and anger at the world, causing him to look outwardly on society but failing to look inwardly on himself. The death of his father and the task for vengeance leads him to question whether or not he should follow through in killing Claudius. He becomes a man of thought rather than a man of action. In addition, the delay of King Claudius’ murder leads the readers to believe that he wishes not to kill him; he
Claudius is ultimately revealed as the antagonist of Hamlet because he removed the good from his life, becoming the prime opposition of Hamlet. He is then faced with the king’s direction to avenge his father’s death by doing anything it takes to reveal the crimes of Claudius. Although not the chief antagonist, another opposition to Hamlet is his mother, whose crime is also revealed by the deceased king Hamlet. The king tells Hamlet how his wife betrayed him when he comments, “whose love was of that dignity that it went hand in hand even with the vow I made to her in marriage, and to decline upon a wretch whose natural gifts were poor to those of mine” (I.vi.786-791). Queen Gertrude has also crushed Hamlet’s belief of his mother’s faithfulness by forgetting her vows and looking to Claudius’ gifts and love when she should be remembering king Hamlet. Both Claudius and Gertrude threw Hamlet’s integral foundations out the window, leaving Hamlet infuriated and ready to do what it takes to avenge his father’s death and accuse his opposing family of their crime against him.
Since the death of his father, King Hamlet, Hamlet his son is eluded between his thoughts and his emotions. The real struggle begins when a ghost, namely the ghost of King Hamlet, his father, accuses Hamlet’s uncle Claudius for his murder. When the ghost tells Hamlet about the reason for the murder Hamlet expresses his thoughts and feelings with passion, “The serpent that sting thy father’s life/Now wears his crown” (Shakespeare). The passion from his anger is also evident at the end of the soliloquy when he calls his uncle “damned villain” (Shakespeare). Hamlet’s mother, Gertrude is also accused by the ghost of King Hamlet for being sexually involved with Claudius and hamlet passionately with rage and anger calls his mother “O most precious women” (Shakespeare) at the end of his soliloquy. This situation put Hamlet in a sensitive and fierce battle between what’s truth and what’s right. His thoughts do not run in parallel with his emotions, Hamlet being caught up in this internal confusion keeps on delaying his actions. Furthermore Hamlet’s reason to kill Claudius comes from his passion, but his intelligence gives him reasons not to kill his uncle Claudius. He keeps
Shakespeare’s Hamlet is a tragic play about murder, betrayal, revenge, madness, and moral corruption. It touches upon philosophical ideas such as existentialism and relativism. Prince Hamlet frequently questions the meaning of life and the degrading of morals as he agonizes over his father’s murder, his mother’s incestuous infidelity, and what he should or shouldn’t do about it. At first, he is just depressed; still mourning the loss of his father as his mother marries his uncle. After he learns about the treachery of his uncle and the adultery of his mother, his already negative countenance declines further. He struggles with the task of killing Claudius, feeling burdened about having been asked to find a solution to a situation that was
The play, Hamlet by William Shakespeare, surrounds the central idea of revenge and betrayal. Revenge drives the characters and determines their actions throughout the play, which results in several instances of betrayal. With revenge, the friendship and loyalty of characters are tested and conflicts are established between characters. Hamlet’s father, the king of Denmark, was helplessly poisoned by his own brother, Claudius. Hamlet, the protagonist, becomes aware of his father’s death and finds himself seeking revenge and starting a cycle of hatred. Hamlet embarks on his journey for revenge by displaying an act of craziness. Throughout the play, there were several moments where Hamlet’s actions caused confusion and made it difficult for
In Hamlet, Shakespeare uses various characters to demonstrate the concept of passion versus reason. He uses his story to show the readers that passion and reason can both exist, but it is necessary to find a balance between the two. As evident in Prince Hamlet’s life, an overabundance of passion can be harmful to oneself and to others. Throughout the play, he faces an internal battle: he must choose between rationality and sentiment. This task becomes especially hard, however, when the ghost of Hamlet’s father comes back from the grave to share the horrible story of his murder. The late King has been poisoned and replaced by his own brother, Claudius, and, driven by sorrow and agony, Prince Hamlet decides to get revenge. Hamlet’s plan is to kill Claudius. This idea seems extreme. However, it is reasonable that the Prince would act irrationally as a coping strategy. In times of loss, especially after the loss of a parent, it is normal to experience overwhelming thoughts and sometimes “emotional issues” arise (“Adult Death of a Parent).
Some say that the revenge of a patiently plotting man is to be feared more than the uncontrolled rage of a mad man. However, Hamlet does not fit either category. He is neither a patient man who carefully plots out his revenge nor a madman that cannot control his actions. Hamlet is merely trapped inside his convoluted mind. Before Hamlet’s final declaration of revenge in Act IV, he was still in shock over the death of his father and the incredible situation that he was placed in, having to kill King Claudius. Hamlet finally comes to terms with his mind and settles that he must exact revenge soon or scrap his thoughts altogether. Shakespeare utilizes dramatic diction, vivid imagery, and specific syntax to describe the shift towards action in Hamlet’s state of mind.
Hamlet does not only value his own morality, but also the morality of others. Besides worrying about his own morality, his mother's morality has much significance to him. As Robert Luyster states, "Hamlet would have Gertrude, like himself, become purified, but this can only be done through the acceding to consciousness' claim to be hard"(Luyster 77). Hamlet contemplates his every action. This problem eventually overwhelms him while also causing his madness. The depth of his thought concerning the murder of Claudius following Hamlet's play reveals his madness. "Reason and action are not opposed in Hamlet, but for most of the play, they fail to coalesce as either we or the characters would like them to" (Kastan 48).