The goals of theoretical and applied research are divergent yet integrated. Theoretical researchers seek to describe the foundations of knowledge, existence, and understanding while applied researchers build upon the work of theoretical researchers to improve a targeted factor in a field of study. All research, whether theoretical or applied, aims to create an impact on society. The type of impact may vary from influencing policy decisions that form legislation to developing improved methodologies for field implementation. The following steps lead to impact: discovery, experimental development, public investment, and implementation.
The discovery phase provides the foundational groundwork for future innovations. Theoretical researchers define the existence of elements in the field, break down the components, and examine the process. Applied researchers pursue new knowledge for a targeted purpose by taking the theoretical components and investigating how to apply them into practice. During this phase, both theoretical and applied researchers attempt to establish empirical evidence to support their assertions through observation, experimentation, or experience. Basic theoretical or applied research alone will not lead to widespread impact rather they
…show more content…
Qualitative and quantitative studies test theories, apply knowledge into practice, and evaluate and analyze results to further this development. A researcher or team of researchers may complete pilot studies to evaluate the potential effectiveness of a new products, methods, or processes. The results of these studies may lead to further investigations, revisions, questions, and product developments. The cycle of pilot testing and evaluation takes a considerable amount of time and requires negotiation among interested parties, but this cycle is important to complete before gaining public
Research reviewers can vary in their approach and design to systematizing their review. For example, reviewers can decide to include studies with only certain design characteristics or those using a full range of designs (Brown, 2014). Furthermore, the qualitative, quantitative, and mixed method approaches can be distinguished by a systematic analysis of the research method (Boswell & Cannon, 2017).
This is applied research where a knowledge development objective is the end result (Blanche & Durrheim, 1999: 41).
The exploratory research process is somewhat analogous to a signal detection and amplification system. The output is a new strategy and/or a roadmap for new research developments. The input must be identified through constantly scanning or “sampling” the environment for new research developments, then filtering these “signals” to identify a subset of potentially relevant opportunities. These opportunities must then be “amplified” through internal and external research before making a strategic decision to move them toward technology and product development [1, 3].
The rationale behind selection a literature review as study methodology, because the literature review method help to demonstrate and describe current knowledge
Researchers often times are faced with the decision of choosing a methodology of research; either Quantitative or Qualitative that they think best fits their study and objectives. This choice is guarded by the topic of study, the advantages and disadvantages, and the strengths and weaknesses of using either one or the other type of the methodologies.
The goal of a research study is to generate new knowledge, which can then be shared within the scientific community. Unlike QI and EBP, research is conducted using a systematic process known as the scientific method. The scientific method is used to ensure results from a study are valid and reliable (Potter & Perry, 2012, p. 57). The research process is rigorous and studies must follow strict guidelines and be approved by the IRB. Data collection for research projects is more time intensive and is not rapid cycle like QI. In addition, funding for research projects typically comes from an external source such as a grant (Shirey et al.,
Prepare a critical analysis of a quantitative study focusing on protection of human participants, data collection, data management and analysis, problem statement, and interpretation of findings. The quantitative research article can be from your previous literature review or a new peer-reviewed article.
Quantitative research deals with numbers and is measurable. Some examples of quantitative data are cost, number of participants and time. This type of research is systematic and uses the more traditional scientific method of data collection and presentation. Qualitative research has data that is nonnumeric in nature and it is difficult to measure. As the root of the same suggests, it gives a quality description of the data being viewed. It can include descriptions or verbal responses. Qualitative data is subjective in the sense that the answer can be different amongst various people.
Experimentation methods can be used to develop a product by testing whether their product awareness increases after certain campaigns, different packaging or new products are released. This will help change the product over time into something they public prefer.
In defining quantitative research the term can be dichotomized. Firstly, research refers to creative, systematic work with the intention to increase the knowledge of man and thereby devise new applications (OECD, 2002). In addition Gray (1997) stated that research should improve performance and that the results should be
In the modern age of health,education and public safety, society relies on rigorous research methods to find answers to complex issues dealing with social issues and general concerns. Ultimately, some short-term research methods may initially fail; however, continued extended research should surely result in success and benefit future generations. Depending on the topic of research; some research methods might be more appropriate than others. For example, clinical and laboratory experimental trials might receive better consummation if they use Quasi-experimental and Classical Experimental design rather than Cross Sectional Studies and Longitudinal Studies which focuses more on psychological experiments and behavior studies (Addison) (2015).
This essay discusses the philosophies, concepts, and methodologies of research investigations. Research designs are contrasted and compared to assess benefits, limitations, and applications. Approaches to quantitative and qualitative studies are illustrated and explained. The operations and purposes of program evaluations and action research studies are elucidated.
Qualitative Data Collection assignment was chosen as meeting Outcome 6 - Evaluate evidence-based decision making to create new practices, because it provided sources that can be used in evaluating evidence-based decision making in the creation of new practices. Data is a tool that can validate the need for creating new practices; subsequently, it can measure the outcomes desired to be obtain through action research. Data obtained from the interview and observation processes can provide adequate information about what is needed to implement the change process. The data needed for the
Throughout this course I have learned many things about research at an introductory level. Research is a critical part of all of our lives in many ways. God blesses each of us with a degree of common sense and we all learn from observing others even as babies, we learned behaviors and skills by observing our parents. Walking through experiences throughout life teach us a lot we need to know as well but sometimes we have to take a better approach when we need to learn about certain things. Many of us know that what works in some situations or with certain individuals doesn’t always work or is the safest option for another situation. Controlled and precisely organized study allows scientists to compare and examine contrasting methods and concepts, also helps them to discover various approaches and be able to learn from individual’s behaviors and experiences. I will act as the case study throughout this paper in order to observe what I have learned about.
Undoubtedly, there is an unswerving relationship between the theory and its application. Theory offers direction in research, and its application affords a baseline for research. In the following text, the relationship between theory and application and the manner in which a theory guides practices is espoused upon. Therefore, the purpose of this paper is to show how research and theory are connected and how both serve as models for good practice in finding the appropriate information that allows investigators to resolve issues and to solve research problems, while also adding to the world’s body of knowledge (Akang, 2012).