Chapter 15 is a very interesting chapter, I really enjoyed reading this chapter, it discussed the theory of change, reframing, paradoxical interventions, problem information/ resolution, stochastic process, perturbed versus change agent, meaningful noise, language and worldview, stability and change and information and perturbation. A theory of change is connected with two perspectives how the worldview analyzes things. The first-order cybernetic perspective is one, which means the therapist intervenes from a position outside the system and the second-order cybernetics perspective the therapist perturbs from a position withing the system. I started to evaluate my life and started to think what I needed to change, and what problems I needed to work on. …show more content…
When I feel as though I want to make a change for myself, I take baby steps to get there, I take my time and also I make big leaps of changes when I want to challenge myself, to see if I am up for the challenge or strong enough for it. The book stated that second -order change has been compared to the leap of imagination experienced in the moment of creativity (cited). First-order consists of what we think of as the logical solutions to problems (cited). Both first-order and second-order relates to me, for examples with the first order I would have a problem with being lazy, I will ask someone to do something for me but in return, I'm too lazy to do for others if that make sense. The Key to understanding the problem formation and resolution, therefore, are awareness, of the reciprocal nature of behavior, the importance of the context that defines behavior and in which particular behaviors have meaning and thus (once again) the significance of process (cited). I feel as though the only way for me to understand certain context is by examples, and
In conclusion, the statement at the start of the chapter that “if we only draw upon one particular frame, then this will take us away from thinking about what is going on from an alternative perspective” reminds us as manager leading change in an organization to not just jump to the first idea on how to make change. We need to be able to think outside the box and make a change in how we react to change and what are first instincts of action would be. Having different perspectives in how to go about change will allow managers to really engage and figure out what the best plan of
This new outlook will also alter your views on the nature of change. I wrote earlier that your current view of change is that an expert facilitates the change in client functioning. What you will come to realize is that the client himself or herself is the expert. The client knows himself or herself the best and it’s that person’s perception of reality that holds truth for that person. I realize this is a radical shift from your current perspective. Do not fear, your new understanding will develop as you move through the course modules.
The first step of changing the mind-set is about intellect the power and limits of mental models. The second step consist of testing the importance of people's mental models opposed to changing environment, create new models, and develop an integrated portfolio of models. The third step is overcoming obstacles to change by transforming infrastructure as well as people's thinking. The last step involves transforming one's life by immediately acting upon the new models within experimenting continuously, applying a process for assessing and strengthening one's models. These four steps will help Vernon and Bud feel more comfortable with the new changes. First, Vernon and Bud have to be concerned of their mindsets that are retaining them back once they achieved that then they can be tested on the new changes. Through reshaping their way of thinking they can achieve their impediments of change. Once they changed their old way of thinking and seeing the world, now they can rapidly act upon their new mindsets on how they see the new change. (Rowe, 2004).
The process of change describes how people change. These processes of change are divided into two categories; cognitive and behavioral. Cognitive is the thinking process of change and behavioral is the action process of change. The transtheoretical model suggests that people use different strategies, techniques or different amounts of each at different stages in their change process. Self-efficacy refers to confidence and an individual’s experience with confidence to perform specific behaviors in specific situations. Self-efficacy is a good predictor of behavior change. An individual with higher self-efficacy may be more likely to change a behavior even if the situation doesn’t have any positive reinforcements (Campbell, Eichhorn, Early, Caraccioli, Greely, 2012).
Shirey (2013) wrote about Lewin’s theory of change in which three stages individuals move through before change is
Lippitt’s Phases of Change Theory Lippitt, Watson, and Westley (1958) extend Lewin’s Three-Step Change Theory. Lippitt, Watson, and Westley created a seven-step theory that focuses more on the role and responsibility of the change agent than on the evolution of the change itself. Information is continuously exchanged throughout the process. The seven steps are:
Leading and managing change require a solid theoretical foundation. This assignment will research the theoretical elements of change and change management. Addressed will be the following: Organic Evolution of Change, Formulating Strategic Development Approaches, Leadership and Management Skills and Gathering and Analyze Data. As societies continue to evolve and changing demand creates the need for new products and services, businesses often are forced to make changes to stay competitive. The businesses that continue to survive and even thrive are usually the ones that most readily adapt to change. A variety of factors can cause a business to reevaluate its methods of operation. According to literature from the past two
Lippitt’s Phases of Change is an extension of Lewin’s Three-Step Theory. The focus on Lippitt’s change theory is on the change agent rather than the change itself.
To sum it up, it is evident that Transtheoretical Model of change would create positive impacts in regard to transformation of alcohol addicts while helping them to have positive behavioral changes. Transtheoretical theory of change helps a patient to undergo a series of changes over time as they end up their behavior. The ultimate goal of this model is to ensure that any patient has terminated the behavior that compromises their health. The theory is also helpful as it provides an opportunity for a patient to have decisional balance for their behavior while promoting self efficacy at the same time.
The traditional change model consists of three steps: unfreezing, that is, recognizing the need for change because of some event or threat, the actual change actions and refreezing, that is, incorporating new ways of operating, and thinking into the everyday operations of the organization. Apply this model to the situation at the Coca-Cola Company at the point when the lawsuit was served in 1999.
Change happens in all aspects of life. Leaders view change as being good most of the time. An organization can’t move forward without change. This paper will discuss how leaders can use levels of change and the steps of Kotter’s change model to implement change. It will also give a Christian worldview as it pertains to the topics. Leader must learn the language to effectively communicate change. This will give managers an advantage and help demonstrate the vision for the future.
Seven Habits of Highly Effective People starts off with an introduction to the concept of Paradigm Shift which is, essentially, a change in basic assumptions. Author Stephen R. Covey prepares the reader to have a change in mindset. Covey explains that there exists a different perspective amongst individuals. Two people can see the same thing but each individual can have a very different understanding from one another. The first three habits introduced in the book deals shifting from dependence to independence.
Burke (2014) stated that organizations change from day to day. The changes that take place in organizations can be intentional or unintentional. Generally, the changes that occur is accidental. It is important to have a broader and deeper knowledge of understanding organization change. Understanding what is currently happening as well as trends in which the organization is functioning can provide such awareness.
This model is built on the belief that applying change can be associated with entailing and creating a perception that a change is needed, which is then proceeded by moving towards the change and seeding the required norms to the change to ensure that the new behaviour is enforced and solidified (Mindtools.com, 2015).
Defining Change Change can be defined as an event that occurs when something passes from one state or phase to another, the result of alteration or modification, to lay aside, abandon, or leave for another, become different in essence; to lose one's or its original nature, to make different; cause a transformation, or to make or become different in some particular way, without permanently losing one's or its former characteristics or essence. There are many different views as to the complexity of change. Some may believe change is an illusion and nothing ever really changes. However, the majority, such as the post structuralism theorists, believe that change is inevitable. Change can be viewed