Therapeutic Cloning Research Paper

Some people actually say that we can benefit from cloning. Scientists think that we can clone “geniuses” and advance in society (Utah Genetics). This brings up a very good point. What if we can clone 5 Albert Einsteins?! What if we clone all of the smartest minds to ever exist. Can we cure cancer? I think we can! Maybe we can even stop ebola. Lots of people are seriously thinking about this and how beneficial it would be. But some people can take this out of hand. Some scientists are considering making “human farms” where clones are made and their only purpose is to kill them and take their organs to sell. This is why cloning should not be easily accessible. Some freaky scientists are actually considering this idea. We need to be smarter, we need to be consistent , and we need to keep an eye out for these crazy scientists. And God knows what other crazy idea they have inside their heads. But many people think that cloning can be beneficial to society if it is used

First and foremost, therapeutic cloning has the potential to save lives. The cloned stem  cells, acquired with the nucleus from the embryo, can help create new and healthy tissues. These tissues could be muscle, epithelial, connective, or nervous. Tissues make up the organs, which help the body itself to function. Therefore, this type of cloning essentially can repair and replace human organs. For example, say a person gets hurt in a car accident and suffers damage to the heart from the force of the crash. Therapeutic cloning would help repair the tissue in the heart and the organ itself, restoring the body. In addition, another huge benefit of therapeutic cloning is its ability to enhance pharmaceuticals and help treat disease. Diseases can be treated by the cells created in the process. This can lead to strives in

     As soon as you mention the word cloning, you are most likely to ignite a debate. This is because people are greatly divided on whether it's good or bad. A way to reach a conclusion is to look at cloning from ethical, risk, and religious perspectives. The reality is, cloning is unethical, very risky, and irreligious. The arguments I will make will hopefully convince you that cloning is not good for the future.

Animals like mice have been successfully cloned and will more than likely facilitate the discovery for new treatments for human disease. Therefore by cloning animals like mice and then them getting a human disease scientist will be able to do test and research on the disease that the animal has and they can then try and find a cure for the disease and if it works on the animals it would work on humans. Also if you clone maybe 100 mice and they have different diseases you can find different cures for all of those diseases. Now my partner is going to talk about the cons on cloning and explain why the cons are

Individuals who are afflicted by these diseases die, often within their first four years of life. There is no viable reason why children should not have the chance to lead full and happy lives, with the help of cloning technology that reality could be achieved. Those opposed to the practice of human cloning argue that it is unnatural to create a living being for the sole purpose of study and science. This is really not the case at all; while some may be asked to participate in experiments for the betterment of humanity they are not painful or impractical procedures and will only involve taking DNA samples with little or no inconvenience inflicted upon the subject. Besides occasional testing, cloned humans would certainly be able to live normal lives. The fact being that the only difference between them and a regular human is the sequence of their genetic code.

Cloning body parts has the ability to save many lives around the world. According to the U.S Department of Health and Human Services tently people die a day waiting for an organ transplant. Cloning creates vital organs which can stop people from suffering. People are in that waiting list for years hoping they receive that heart, lung, liver, and or other body parts. Society now has the option to help and create.There will not be anymore unneeded surgeries performed, no more waiting, but

While there appears to be many advantages for the continuation of cloning research, there are other drawbacks that may negatively impact the society in the future. Cloning may reduce genetic variability by producing populations that have the same genetic make-up. This population would be susceptible to the same diseases and could potentially be wiped out by a single strain of virus. Such a result could be catastrophic and devastate entire nations. Cloning in human would inevitably lead to testings on human subjects and genetic tailoring of offspring. It is plausible that scientists could alter genetic coding to produce a baby with desirable traits resulting in a ‘perfect human’ with heightened senses and sub-normal intelligence. There have been no occurrences to

For starters, cloning has said to solve the continuous problem of infertility by inserting a clone embryo into the woman’s body. This guarantees infertile couples a child, as opposed to wasting time and money on other painful and emotional procedures that don’t offer this guarantee. The next benefit offers an immense amount of growth in regenerative medicine and assists those with physical disabilities by producing clones of themselves. Why clone themselves if they have a disability? Scientists can use cells from the embryo to customize the regeneration of the new organ, tissue, or body part. As far as cloning an organ goes, this benefits the millions of people who acquired a disease with no cure. For example, diseases such as Alzheimer’s,

I’m 100% supportive of therapeutic cloning but reproductive cloning is where I draw the line. How could someone be so comfortable with playing God? I’m not a religious person but if an animal or a person were meant to still roam this earth, then they would continue to do so.

The moral code for religious people stands at cloning being unacceptable. Various religious followers believe that science is “playing God”. This also corresponds with laws of the United States as well as other countries. Laws have outlawed cloning in general or have research monitored, “the issue was first addressed by California legislature, which banned reproductive cloning, or cloning to initiate a pregnancy, in 1997. Since then Arkansas, Connecticut, Indiana, Iowa, Maryland, Massachusetts, Michigan, Rhode Island, New Jersey, North Dakota, South Dakota, and Virginia have enacted measures to prohibit reproductive cloning,” (NCLS 1).

Therapeutic cloning requires the destruction of human embryos in the test tube. Therefore using this technique to collect embryonic stem cells is wrong, regardless of whether such cells are used to benefit sick or injured people. Also some experts are concerned about the striking similarities between stem cells and cancer cells, both of them have the ability to divide infinitely and studies show that after 60 cycles of cell division, stem cells can gather mutations that can lead to

Introduction- Cloning is defined as two organisms having identical genetic DNA and has been around since the early 1800s. When people think of the word ‘cloning’ many think of Dolly the sheep; however, the first organism to ever be cloned was a sea urchin in 1885. When scientists created Dolly, they took a cell from the mammary gland from an adult Finn Dorset sheep and an egg cell from a Scottish blackhead sheep. Dolly’s white face was the first sign that she was genetically modified because if she wasn 't, she would have a black face like her surrogate mother. After her procedure, the scientists named her after the country singer, Dolly Parton. (1,2,3,5)

Beginning with the moral argument, one must understand reproductive freedom. Most cloning activists say that reproduction, or the lack there of, is a natural freedom given to people (C). Restricting human cloning would be a violation of that right. Just as people can choose not to reproduce using contraception, abortion, or abstinence, people should be allowed to use all means possible within their ability to reproduce, such as through cloning and in vitro fertilization (C). Cloning is the application of this right specifically (C). Another benefit of cloning is the ability to clone someone who has died to console those who are grieving over their lost loved one or to clone the DNA of a person that was known for his of her greatness. Scientists would be able to recreate these people in a new environment (C). A clone's parent may have come from

Technology is advancing at a greater rate than anyone could have imagined, it is said that the first person to live up to 1,000 years old is alive today. However, many humans have a fear that this power of creation is fashioning an earthy trinity of man, science, and technology. Many of those who believe and fear this idea are apprehensive of various upcoming technological advances. After the first successful cloning experiment of a sheep, Dolly, scientists have looked into human cloning and the benefits it would offer humanity. Cloning of humans would give parents who are infertile the possibility to have a child that would be biologically theirs and if they wish theirs partners. Additionally, cloning would help aid people who are sick. Thru cloning humans, doctors would be able to have a perfect organ transplant or bone marrow donor. Furthermore, the advancement in cloning would generate an evolution in genetic research, helping clone identical cells and tissue along with reproducing human organs identical to the one the patients needs with their own DNA. Under a utilitarian stance, it is morally correct for us to conduct human cloning because it benefits the greater good. Human cloning would not undermine God or create an uneven advantage to those cloned; it will only help create advances in our society and help save more human lives.

I view cloning with mixed feelings, but I agree strongly with cloning being right. I do not believe that cloning humans to make more humans is right, but I do think cloning human organs to replace a defective gene is right. In England, scientists are heavily researching the embryo for stem cells. Right now the British scientists can use early embryos to study specific problems such as infertility, congenital diseases, contraception and prenatal diagnostics. Cloning good stem cells and using them for babies with these problems would prevent the diseases from ever happening. The reason for using the stem cell is because the cell is so versatile. Stem cells are taken from human embryos and fetal tissue. The cell, when never used, like in embryos, can be turned into nearly any cell type of the whole body. Scientists also expect that when using cloned embryos a person would easily overcome the problem of