“There is no hope of doing perfect research” (Griffiths, 1998, p97). Do you agree?
The statement by Griffiths (1998) that there is no hope in doing perfect research (97) has raised a few eyebrows and has become a highly controversial issue over the past decade. Reading and Writing sources (2010) defines research as a systematic examination to obtain facts. According to this definition, research is obtaining accurate, reliable information, with the use of a method. Now, how do we define accuracy and reliability in a world where human beings dominate?
In addition, research is also defined by the Google English dictionary (2010) as a carefully planned and performed analysis, searching for previously unknown facts. If this investigation
…show more content…
According to The Telegraph (2009) the Healthcare Commission found that nearly one in ten complaints received by the NHS was related to a delay in diagnosis or the wrong diagnosis being made. Some of the reasons for false medical diagnosis include, but not limited to, misinterpreted test results and reduced communication and diseases that had similar symptoms. Therefore, since conducting research is a process which follows specific rules and organised procedures in order to get the intended results, the possibility for occurrences such as erroneous interpretation cannot be accurately measured.
Yet, how could one begin to argue that there is hope for perfect research when the evidence is there to show how seriously flawed the process can be at times? Over the past few years, the U.S. Food & Drug Administration (FDA) has been recalling certain drugs following reports of serious injury or death. If there were hope for perfect research, why does the safety of more than a dozen popular prescription drugs have to be examined?
Moreover, all researches are subjected to limitations and errors. During my undergraduate degree, I conducted a qualitative research. The topic was “The Prevalence of Truancy is a Cause for Major concern in Augstye / Lancaster District”. I used the interview technique to gather information from participants whom I
Ambiguity and lack of regulatory control is echoed in David Powner’s article published in the Lancet Journal: “Clinicians do not always follow an established policy or provide appropriate documentation. Surveys or chart reviews showed that doctors sometimes failed to document specifics of clinical examinations, omitted criteria demanded
WHAT IS RESEARCH? It is a planned process whereby information is collected for a specific purpose, analysed and reported.
‘Research is a diligent and systematic inquiry or investigation into a subject I order to discover or revise facts, theories and applications etc.: recent research in medicine’ (www.dictionary.com).
Research is primarily an investigation. Researchers and scientists gather data, facts, and knowledge to help better understand phenomenon, events and people. Through research, analysis, investigations, and experimentation, we gain a better understanding of our world. As I skimmed the text to find a definition, I found the word research several times on several of the pages in the first chapter. Research is fundamental to any scientific enterprise and statistics is no exception.
Research can be defined as the search for knowledge, or as any systematic investigation, with an open mind, to establish novel facts, solve new or existing problems, prove new ideas, or develop new theories. Research can be divided into different steps in order to understand the whole process more in depth. The first step towards conducting research is to observe. Consistst of the subject area of ones interest and following that subject area to conduct subject related research. The subject area should not be randomly chosen since it requires reading a vast amount of
The second major error made is made up information. We should never infer any information gathered about a patient based on their age, sex, ethnicity, or gender. Just recently, I recruited a patient for a study who was pleasant but very stubborn and did not realize he would have to come in for surgery. Everything in his case happened so fast that he really did not have a chance to process anything. Another research staff member goes to get blood samples and follow up with the patient. The patient is really cranky and agitated. When the research personnel comes back upstairs she is telling everyone that the patient suffers from dementia and inferring how this could affect other parts of the protocol. Well I asked her point blank, “How do you know that patient has dementia? Did his wife fail to disclose this
Research. An action presumed as helpful that can give you a lot of information on topics and subjects you are interested in or forced to do a project on. It can also give you background information and insight on the matters you are looking up. Although research is supposed to be helpful, that is not always the case. This is especially the case when it came to researching the book "First They Killed My Father" by Loung Ung.
Overall, improper research creates falsified data that compromises patient safety, quality, and efficiency of care overtime, which is contrary to the desired outcomes of
It’s important to do good research so we can accurately learn about a subject. Research must always be of high quality in order to produce knowledge that is valid outside of the research setting. Without good research strategies, even intelligent and attentive people can be fooled.
The method of qualitative research become key method in the human and social science and also in the education and health science. The definition of qualitative research is a research using methods such as participant observation or case studies which result in a narrative, descriptive account of a setting or practice. Sociologists using these methods typically reject positivism and adopt a form of interpretive sociology (Parkinson & Drislane,2011). It involves the research using data that do not indicate ordinal values. Furthermore, qualitative research includes the different kinds of data collection, techniques of analysis and diversity of theoretical frameworks (Guest; Namey & Mitchell, 2013). According to Creswell(2013) ‘’the final written report or presentation includes the voices of participants, the reflexivity of the researcher, a complex description and interpretation of the problem, and its contribution to the literature or a call for change.
The main ethical challenge that is presented in this study if changed from a quantitative to a qualitative research design is the respect and protection of the participants. The studies focus is on ensuring safety for the students as they commute to school. The study begins with the students being as young as 9 years old. That may cause a problem when conducting a qualitative study over a course of three years. Qualitative study collects non-numerical data through words and narratives, therefore, it is important to ensure that protective actions are in place to address this ethical concern.
Qualitative research seeks to answer the “why” and not the “how” of the research project that is being conducted, this is done through a complex system of analyzing unstructured information such as survey’s , questionnaires, interviews, interview transcripts, open end survey’s, focus groups, observations, emails, notes, video’s, feed back forms and photo’s; most of the time a qualitative report won’t depend on statistical evidence alone it must be accompanied by detailed facts and proven facts and not hypotheses or in accurate data, this can lead to misunderstanding of data findings and can through the whole aim of the research project off and waste valuable time.
Albert Einstein, on the subject of research, said, “If we knew what it was we were doing, it would not be called research, would it?” While Einstein was referring to a scientist performing an experiment or study, the same idea can be applied to a writer researching for a paper. A paper not built on solid research will be full of fallacies and erroneous information. Readers respect opinions from experts or statistics from high-profile studies. Thus, if a paper is to be credible, it must be founded on solid research. Solid research comes from reliable sources, and reliable sources can come from libraries, peer-reviewed journals, and online searches. Different types of research include books, encyclopedias, and trustworthy scientific or government
Why is knowledge and accuracy something that remains in a realm of uncertainty? It’s virtually within a human’s nature to strive for accuracy throughout daily life; it seems nothing short of a prize, even if it blinds us to the real truth. The desire to be accurate can conflict with other motives and lead a person into falsely believing facts that only pertain to personal values. The article “Trust Me, I’m A Scientist” by Daniel T. Willingham broadens this horizon through discussion as to why so many people choose not to believe what scientists say, and how it’s cause for the direct interest of certain skeptics.
What I have learned about research is that it is a process, a scientific process that psychologist and scientist develop that includes many different approaches and that is carefully peer reviewed and evaluated. There is what is called the Scientific Approach where scientist have an idea or theory and based on their observation will either support the theory or the theory can be falsified by their peers. Data also goes through a review period before it is published in a scientific journal by scientist who have the knowledge and expertise to evaluate it.