The U.S Constitution is one of the most, if not the most, important documents ever written in political history. The constitution established America’s national government and provided the fundamental framework for the present and future legal parameters by which the american people would be governed by. The Constitution was officially signed September 17, 1787 in Philadelphia during a constitutional convention. In order for the constitution to actually be an official document, it had to have been ratified meaning that at least nine of the thirteen states present had to approve this document. It was easy for the first seven voters to make their decisions who were pro-constitution (federalists), but nevertheless, there were people, anti-federalists, who did not support the constitution. Although they did not want the Articles of Confederation in place, neither did they want to ratify the constitution because they opposed of having a strong central government. The ratification of the constitution changed the face of the United States and set forth a model for future documents to come. Federalists fought very hard against their opposing party. Why was it so important to the federalist to get this constitution ratified? The constitution not only meant something to the federalists, but without this ratification, it could have led to secession, and this ratification was needed to make improvements to the government. What exactly did the constitution mean for the federalists? The
The Constitution played a huge role in framing the United States. The document was written on September 17, 1787. Many delegates came to Philadelphia from all around the country to write the Constitution. There were many reasons why the Constitution is so important. Our founding fathers wanted to form a more perfect union and establish justice for our country.
The US Constitution was written in 1787, it was later ratified in 1788 then taken in 1789. Supporters of the ratification of the Constitution where known to be the Federalists on the contrary those opposing of the ratification of the Constitution where Anti-Federalists. The immediate problem was not just excepting the Constitution but also for a concern of the government. The Anti-Federalists started a movement due to opposing of the Bill of Rights not being in the Constitution. The Anti-Federalists did not want a strong central federal government. They saw the constitution to be too powerful, possibly as a potential threat.
The constitution is a distinguished american document because the men of the eighteenth century put so much effort into fabricating it. After declaring their freedom from England with the Declaration of Independance the colonies needed to form their own government. It would not be a king. The congressmen worked strenuously to create the fairest government for everyone—deliberately excluding a king from their plan. They debated and compromised until the constitution was just right. Proudly the gentlemen called the new government a federal republic. In this type of government the people, who are citizens of America, voted for lawmakers and representatives. The people could choose representatives they thought would
In 1787, the Constitution was written and submitted for ratification by the 13 states, but not everyone agreed with it. There were two groups of though. One was the Anti-federalists, who opposed the Constitution and the other group were the Federalists, who supported it. The Anti-federalists were people who supported the Articles of Confederation because they were doing well under them. They were mostly poor people from rural areas and were supported by the big states. They believed that the Constitution did not secure their rights and gave the central government too much power. The Federalists were mostly the wealthy people who lived in or near city areas and were supported by the smaller states. They believed that the separation of
In 1787, the Constitutional Convention was held in Philadelphia in hopes of revising the Articles of Confederation before the new, established country would become unsustainable. The Articles of Confederation had failed the country as the central government was not strong enough to uphold the country and protect the people’s rights. They were then abandoned and the Founding Fathers began to draft a new government system, what we now know as the US Constitution. At the time the dilemma was, should the Constitution be ratified? The Constitution should be ratified considering that it averts abuse of power, is effective in regulation, and is in the interest of the people.
The United States Constitution was an important document that changed history and a flexible document that could adapt to future challenges for many reasons. This important document replaced the Articles of Confederation, which had many problems from the beginning. Over time, the Constitution has also been amended to meet the challenges in the future.
The Constitutional Convention of 1787 and the subsequent ratification of the constitution proved to be a more significant event in American political history than the Declaration of Independence. Many of the american leaders believed we needed to a new, stronger government. They had to persuade the states that stronger government was the right direction to ensure the country’s success.They did that with the constitutional convention but, To sway the states in the right direction documents such as the Federalist papers led the states to ratify the new U.S. Constitution. Which then led to the U.S. Constitution that we still live by to the day.
We needed a new Constitution badly for our foundling of a nation. The pressure of everything falling apart weighed heavily on the founders in that day, something had to be done to save America from disassembling after our triumphant separation from England. The Articles of Confederation simply weren’t working. Originally, the purpose of the Articles was to give as much power to the states as possible while still uniting them (text 48). The biggest problem was that thought the federal government could recommend and create policies, they could not enforce them, specifically if the states refused them. (text 48) Furthermore, the government was weak, with no real leadership and additionally, could not freely gather revenue from the states and suffered from this. (text 49) What finally pushed our country over the edge was Shays’ Rebellion, a protest of farmers led by Daniel Shays when they demanded change after being heavily taxed to recompense for the wartimes cost, but the government had no response, leading to an attack on state militia. (text 49) So thus, a Constitutional Convention was convened. Plenty disagreed, and these people were called the Anti-Federalists, and believed the document gave the government too
Writing the constitution was a very challenging and lengthy process. When state legislators received the Constitution for their formal approval, not everybody was hoping to sign it. Americans split into two separate groups. The groups consisted of those who supported the Constitution and those who felt other changes needed to be dealt with first. Those who supported the Constitution were known and Federalists and those who argued against it were known as anti-federalists. Although anti-federalists may have had some good arguments against ratifying the constitution, a stronger central government than what the Articles of Confederation provided was needed and supporting the constitution was good way to satisfy that need.
When the founding fathers realized the articles were going to bring the US to chaos, they called a convention in Philadelphia to draft the U.S. Constitution as we know it. This Constitution brought popular sovereignty and republicanism, the ability to collect national taxes and proportional voting. Without these crucial aspects, our world today would be a much different place today, but not for the better. That is why if I had been a U.S. citizen at the time of both the Constitutional Convention and the state ratification debates, I would have supported the Constitutional
The Constitution, a document crafted by our founding father, is the very roots of our nation. The Constitution was not written over night, in fact, it took the minds of many intellectuals who studied past government systems and stood for one main idea, limitation of government and the freedom of the people. A European philosopher, known as John Locke, stood for the natural rights of human beings, which is a massive concept in our Constitution. Another main point that impacted our Constitution was the Petition of Rights, which laid out basic freedoms that the government couldn't interfere with. Lastly, the Articles of Confederation, was created, and ended up being the base for our Constitution we have today. John Locke, the Petition of Rights, and the Article of Confederation all had major impacts on the creation of our Constitution.
America was founded by people who possessed a deeply held belief in the idea of a fundamental right to freedom of religion and freedom of speech. These fundamental beliefs were traced back to the traditions of the English Common Law and the English Constitution. After the American Revolution the first amendment took the form of a collection of fundamental rights contained within State Constitutions. In response to a lack of national power and unity the form of U.S. Government was altered. The newly ratified U.S. Constitution created a form of government of with three branches with stronger enumerated powers. While the new structure a Supreme Court it but did not expressly protect personal liberties like freedom of religion or freedom of speech. In order to ease antifederalist fears of federal encroachments on person freedom, the first ten amendments were added to the Constitution know as the the Bill of Rights. This altered the new form of government by providing federal restrictions. However during Reconstruction the addition of the14th amendment altered the form of government by requiring due process and equal protection for all citizens. Consequently the Supreme Court in the 1920’s changed the form of U.S. government through Judicial activism by applying the protections of the Bill of Rights like the first amendment to include prohibition of infringements States laws. This opened the gateway for further Judicial activism to define the scope and limitations of these
If congress makes the law the president the power of the u.s. Supreme court to determine if law is passed by congress or a presidential action is in accord with the constitution. Who can decide if a law is constitutional or unconstitutional. The framers wrote the constitution.
Each state had to hold a convention after the delegates wrote the Constitution, so the states could decide if they wanted to approve the Constitution. After nine states ratify the Constitution it would go into effect. Some of the states decided to disagree with the Constitution, and therefore it would not be ratified. There was a group of Federalists, and they were the people who thought the Constitution should be ratified. The Federalists favored the National government or a Strong Federal Government. Also, the Federalists felt that there must be a stronger central government for the Union to last. They wanted the central government to have powers, such as the power to enforce laws, which the articles did not have. Also, there was a group of anti-federalists that had opposite thoughts of what the Federalists wanted. The Anti-Federalists felt that the Constitution made the government too strong. One of the main arguments that the anti-federalists used to argue with was, they felt that the central government would take away state power and individual freedom by weakening the states. Another one of the points they argued with was, there was no Bill of Rights, and many other states had one, and in that case there was no protection of basic freedoms. The Federalists and Antifederalists argued against each other whether
People had many different opinions on the ratification of the Constitution. There were Federalists and Anti-Federalists that debated on many topics of the Constitution. The main reasons were: what type of government the United States of America should have, the people controlling our government, and some of the powers they should have. The Federalists were the ones who wanted change. They wanted to make changes to the government that was originally proposed. The Federalists wanted the government to protect the people, but not abuse their powers. They wanted to have the powers divided between the national and the state governments. The Constitution also stated that the government