They Say I Say Journal Analysis

In Chapter 2 of Thank You for Arguing by Jay Heinrichs, he discuses how to distinguish the difference between an argument and a fight, and to decide what you want out of an argument. The key point of an argument is to win over the audience to your point of view. In order to win an argument, you need to persuade them. You want your opponent to be persuaded using subtle logical tactics not power and intimidation. Using power and intimidation is the characteristics of a fight. This is when one person takes out his aggression on another, which does not persuade them but initiate’s revenge or rejection. During a fight, the key objective is to win by attacking and belittling your opponent, paying no attention to getting them to change their mind.

An argument is a claim supported by reasons and pieces of evidence. Arguments have five primary attributes. Firstly, argumentation is a social process which involves two or more parties responding to one another’s proposal or claim. For the case of a written argument, the writer responds to the content of the essay through a critique process. The responses should not only involve restating the same claims and reasons but rather providing supportive pieces of evidence to the positions taken accordingly. Secondly, the aim of an argument is to make the audience adhere to the written critique. The objective is to influence the audience with the aim of gaining support to

In this article titled “Analyzing Arguments: Those You Read and Those You Write” goes over multiple strategies and examples to help you analyze the meaning and purpose of a specific argument and how to strengthen your own.

In presenting an argument, should a writer strive to be the final authority or a reasonable voice on an issue? Review Chapter 22 to understand the difference. Then, using your topic and one or more of your sources, define and provide an example of an arguable claim as opposed to a personal judgment.

The tool of argumentation has been used throughout the entirety of history. Arguing can occur in many different situations, yet most have a misconceived interpretation of what the term actually is. According to author Jay Heinrichs, an argument is properly defined as having the ability to “convince your opponent, or enemy, by changing his mood, his mind and his willingness to act” (Heinrichs, 15). Heinrichs also claims that to be able to master the art of arguing, one must be able to persuade anyone to do anything. In order to establish one 's standpoint on a position, one must possess a range of tools to be able to properly convince an audience. The two texts “Time 's Up For Title IX

Pattern recognition helps to develop the skills necessary to develop a differential diagnosis. When seeing patients in the clinical setting, practitioners begin to recognize associated symptoms, health history details, and assessment findings that are related to specific system alterations. By acknowledging these repetitive patterned-like affiliations from clinical scenarios, we as learners can begin to transform our foundational knowledge to critical thinking, diagnostic reasoning, and differential development. According to work by Flott and Linden (2015), a positive learning environment can be supported by understanding "attributes" that support learning (p. 501). Hence, pattern recognition is an example of an attribute that will contribute to learning in the clinical setting for nurse practitioner students. Consequently, being able to mentally sort a group of symptoms, findings, and diagnostics that are related to a particular problem can help build an intellectual database of reference. As a result, these steps help students develop a diagnosis, differential, and plan of care. A reflection of pattern recognition, problem-based learning, and clinical experiences will be examined further to help substantiate the contributions to the learning experience.

I found the article on “Argument” helpful because; the topic is understandable, did a good job to defined the topic, the order of relevant, provided specific examples how to improve my writing of college papers.

It is significant that pastoral caregivers find that balance between caring for self and the caring for those they have dedicated their lives to giving care. This was a very enlightening week in reading the narratives of Robert C. Dykstra, “Images of Pastoral Care.” There was one in particular, “the intimate stranger”. He spoke about his own personal stresses and challenges and disillusionment which confronted him as a pastoral caregiver. It is not he did not love his vocation as a hospital chaplain, he sensed it was beginning to take a toll on him. Dykstra, was very open and honest in regards to what occurred in his life. Pastoral caregivers have dedicated their lives to being there in crisis situations for others. It is the assumption pastoral caregivers will always have the answers to everyone else’s hurts and hopes.

I’ve made it through Part 1 of They Say I Say, and I have to say that it’s one of the most readable writing texts that I’ve ever read. It’s not as good as Anne Lamott’s Bird By Bird, but that’s my all-time favorite. The authors lay the foundation of the book’s premise that good argumentative writing begins with a reaction to (or acknowledgement of) existing arguments. The start of the section featured an anecdote about a presenter’s lauding of Dr. X’s research. The authors (who were in the audience) appreciated the information, but there was the nagging “So what?” question. The authors go on to suggest that much of the academic writing assigned to students reflects scenario.

They Say I Say is extremely useful in learning how to write argumentative papers because the authors discuss the “I say” of an argumentative paper by providing many real life examples and templates for new writers to experiment with. For example, on page 60, templates are provided for disagreeing with an argument and using reasoning. One of the templates reads, “X claims that ___ rests upon the questionable assumption that ___”(Graff). On page 62, templates for agreeing are presented, one of which is, “X is surely right about ___ because, as she may not be aware, recent studies have shown”(Graff). It is also expressed in this chapter that students feel uncomfortable agreeing with arguments made or disagreeing. On page 63 the authors also recognize

Thank You For Arguing is a book written by Jay Heinrichs who introduces the reader to the art of rhetoric, rhetoric is the art of effective expression and the persuasive use of language. Jay Heinrichs, a leader in modern rhetoric, is a journalist and writer of six books ranging from personal betterment, to the future of America. Mr. Heinrichs’s book, a New York Times bestseller, has been translated into a stunning twelve different languages, and published in three different editions. The following paragraphs summarize, and expand upon the main ideas of the book, and why it should be used today.

Never did I think in a writing class that I would have to stick to the sidelines of an argument in every paper. Consistently throughout my academic career this niche I felt so accustomed to as a writer was certainly argumentative essays. This was certainly relevant being that much of my dialogue over the semester would veer to assumptions due to a large focus on rhetoric in previous classes. I was itching to answer the big questions where a continuation to the overall conversation was the goal in mind. This comfort zone I landed myself in prior to the class over time can be seen less throughout the semester. I like to see this as a journey away from a bias stance certainly due to the relevant focus on the writing and reflecting learning outcomes

I argue with people a lot because I like being right and arguing my side. Although, nothing annoys me more than when people try to argue about something they know little or nothing about. I have argued hundreds of times and wether I win or lose I always feel satisfied because I got something from the conversation either the feeling of great victory over my defeated opponent or the knowing that I learned something that I could use to win another argument. I don’t get that same feeling when someone just says random things that don’t pertain to the argument because they don’t have the knowledge to back themselves up. I have argued with many people and found them lacking in knowledge but immovable in their ideas.

The expression argument has two meanings in scholarly writing. First, it means a composition that takes a position on one side of a divisive issue. You might write an argument against the death penalty, or for or against censorship of pornography. But argument has another meaning, too. It means an essay that, simply, argues a point. You might assemble an argument about the significance of ancestor myths in a certain aborigine culture, or you might write an argument defending your understanding of any poem or essay that is read in your philosophy class. (Winthrop University) You are not necessarily taking one side of a divisive issue, but you are required to defend your points with credible evidence. You are taking a position. In a sense,

Argumentative writing allows students to use many skills all at once including: critical thinking, forming ideas, evaluating views, using logic, and researching. Students need to learn how to write argumentatively to be successful in college and employment. In these positions, individuals will be asked to write a confident and strongly opinionated paper.