Third Party President Biography Gary Earl Johnson is the Libertarian Party nominee to be president. Gary was born on January 1, 1953 in Minot, North Dakota. Gary is the son of Lorraine B. and Earl W. Johnson. In 1971 Johnson graduated from Sandia High School in Albuquerque, New Mexico. Gary attended the University of New Mexico from 1971 to 1975 where he graduated with a Bachelor of Science degree in political science. Gary met his future wife, Denise “Dee” Simms while he was in the Sigma Alpha Epsilon fraternity. He made his own business in 1976 called Big J Enterprises that dealt with door-to-door handyman jobs. His business was weak until he made a large contract from Intel’s expansion in Rio Rancho. Gary eventually grew the business
Who is Gary Johnson? Gary earl Johnson is an American businessman, author, politician, libertarian party nominee for president of the united states. This was not the only time when he was nominated for president, he apply couple of times. Gary also have a personal life like each human at the world, but not all the people see this part of his life. Because they are concentrated just in the political thigs.
the president of the United States every four years is the focal point of the
William Harrison was the ninth president of the United States, from March 4, 1841, to April 4, 1841, and the first president to die in office. Born in Charles City County, Virginia in 1773, went to school at Hampden-Sydney College, studied classics and history. Then he switches interest and “obtained a commission as ensign in the First Infantry of the Regular Army, and headed to the Northwest” (White House) and spent most of his life there. Overall, he resigned from the army, in 1798, and became Secretary of the Northwest Territory. Started off as a democratic-republican party, but then became a Whig Party when he became president.
Following the end of the American Revolution, the new Constitution and its laws were implemented. This new governing document augmented the dimensions of American political life in allowing the voting citizens of the United States to partake in the idea of popular sovereignty. As the voters chose their own national leaders as well as their local and state officials, power would draw its roots to the American people. As a result of the election of 1788, there was a massive Federalist majority in the national government, with 44 of them in the House of Representatives compared to the meager 8 Antifederalists. As expected, George Washington was chosen to be president by the electoral college with John Adams as his vice president.The turning
As the air becomes crisp and leaves begin to change their color, every American knows November 8th will be soon upon them. Americans are given the daunting opportunity to change their lives and the lives of three hundred million others. Most of age voters will flock to the polls to elect who they believe, is the most capable candidate, and therefore leader, to run the United States of America. The next president needs to be the quintessential and iconic figure of leadership. The two front runners are Donald Trump representing the republican party, and Hillary Clinton of the democratic party, who both continue to battle it out and push their political agendas aggressively to earn the vote of the public. However, there is a third political party which is on the rise, that combines the ideas of both mainstream parties but in the process reshapes and defines them. Gary Johnson of the libertarian party, is the candidate to do such a task. Libertarianism takes the fundamental “small government” idea from republicans and combines it with the more liberal stances from the democrats, such as abortion, women’s rights, freedom of choice, and individual judgement. Nonetheless, all of the political stances of the candidate are useless unless they can be effective and productive leaders. Fred Greenstein, a published author on politics, wrote a book called the Presidential Difference: Leadership style from FDR to George W Bush, where he describes the
I agree with this statement because third parties are not very well known enough to get the presidential election and have never had a party member elected into the presidential office. Third party influence is not very high so even though the option is there, more people are likely to vote for the more well known Democratic and Republican than the third party, which means third party candidate votes
Third party candidates have the potential to play a significant role in influencing the outcome of elections. In 2000, Ralph Nader, the green party candidate for President, was said to have handed the election to George W. Bush after he received 97,488 votes in the swing state of Florida (Baughman). Ralph Nader was accused of taking votes away from Al Gore, evidently costing him the election. Most recently, third party candidate Gary Johnson was accused of swinging the election in Hillary Clinton’s favor when he received 9% of the popular vote in the state of New Mexico.
“The Democratic Party at its worst is better for the country than the Republican Party at its best.” This was a statement made by Lyndon B. Johnson in 1955. Lyndon B. Johnson of course was a Democrat. Is this quote true today? That is a question that can only be answered after a careful analysis of the philosophy of the Republican and Democratic leaders that help to run this nation.
America is vastly known as a country boundlessly pursuing equality in all facets of life. In this seemingly endless quest for equal opportunity, there has been one lurking negation; our election system. The addition to equal representation in public funding and on the ballot will create variability and allow Americans to entrust their vote in a political format that more closely aligns with democratic philosophy. Therefore, a shift away from a bipartisan, a two party, dominated election system would not only be a healthy change for American electoral satisfaction, but for the future of third party politics. Unfortunately affluence and inherent wealth have played a large role in this divide between a true democratic election and our present biased, broken, and benyne system.
All across the world there are major political parties fighting in each country in order to take control of their government. The United States of America is not an exception, as the Democratic and Republican parties compete against each other in every election in order to gain control of the US Government. These two political parties are the most popular and powerful in the US, there are very popular that other political parties have no chance on competing against these two in an election race. In order to win elections the parties need the vote of the people, the parties need for every gender to vote for them in order to have a chance in winning the election. Both parties need the vote of the men and woman, but these genders tend to vote
There have been many different political parties since the beginning of the American political system. A political party is made up of a group of people that share common goals and ideals, and these people work together to help elect people to offices that share these goals to represent them. Political parties work to try to control the government and their ultimate goal is to win as many elections and to gain as many offices as possible.
Despite being the constant underdog and loser in major elections third parties make some significant contribution to the political spectrum in the United States. Third Party Agendas are taken serious by the Democratic and Republican Parties and specific pieces of the Third Party Agendas are sometimes adopted by the two major parties. Third parties give discontented voters other alternatives. The Republican and Democratic Parties have been known to operate in similar styles and third parties give the voter the opportunity to express their discontent. The third parties in the United States are policy advocates and often are more specific about were they stand ideologically. Often the Republican and Democratic Parties try and take a moderate
In my life I have never had any political enforcement or strict religious influence. My parents were very lenient when it came too political preaching. I was taught to be a caring and respectful individual. My political understanding and beliefs have been molded from my early political memories and socialization experiences. As a young adult I have always strived to become knowledgeable about political ideals mainly because I was never really taught to believe in something specific. I eventually was drawn towards many different social and political perspectives, which is how I came to a logical conclusion of how I view the world politically
In the movie “The Candidate” I thought that the film was very interesting to me, being a person that has never been interested in politics. I found it interesting even though I am not for sure if this is the way that campaigns are run now. I thought it was nice to see how some candidates may be chosen, especially in this film because he was not expected to win the election. He was not even interested in politics although his father was once governor. The film showed how the campaign was ran and managed by his advisors. Although not expected to win the election, he somehow
Being the leader of the free world is an accomplishment that citizens of the United States see as job with a vast amount of responsibility. Along with the responsibility comes great scrutiny. Presidents have come and gone, leaving a legacy that either creates a lasting memory of great leadership, or leaves a bad taste in the mouth of American voters. Leading the way in the land of the free is judged by three points: how the president chose to conduct themselves during controversial times, critical situations, and most importantly how they plan to help the citizens of the United States.