Thirteen Reasons Why Analysis

Better Essays
Preserving Intellectual Freedom The American Library Association states that the most challenged and restricted reading material have been children books. However, challenges are not merely an expression of a point of view; on the contrary, it is an attempt to remove materials from public use, thus restricting the access to others. Even if the motivation to ban or challenge a book is well intended, the outcome is unfair for everyone else. Censorship denies our freedom as individuals to choose and think for ourselves. For children, decisions about what books to read should only be made by the people who know them best-their parents! (Letter to the Editor). I strongly disagree when people want books banned based on their own opinion of the book. The novel in question, Thirteen Reasons Why by Jay Asher, is no exception to frequent challenges.…show more content…
It is a privilege that we all have in the United States and it should not be taken lightly. Parents should understand that they have a right to decide what their child reads, but they should not take away that same right from other parents. The attempt to expose students to challenging topics and issues is not intended to force students into a certain mode of thought. Books serve as opportunities for students to think, theorize, question, and explore those topics in a controlled environment directed by teachers, parents, and experts and even though the book contains some sensitive material the lessons learned are far superior to the controversial material presented in Thirteen Reasons Why. Great lessons are not just learned in real life; we can learn them in books as well. Give the book an honest try and do not be biased to sensitive material, grasp the main message of the book then make the final decision, but make sure it is for your child, not the entire school
Get Access