This Fast-Moving Analysis

It is widely accepted that technology can be used for people to connect with one another. One primary example that may spring to mind is the smartphone. No matter the distance between two people, the other party is only a text, call, or instant message (IM) away. In consideration of that, certain methods are favored over others. In her work titled “No Need to Call,” Turkle examines why there is a decline of phone calls. She surveys different generational demographics that bring her to the consensus that, regardless of age, texting holds wider appeal because there is less commitment involved. As a result, calls are more significant, only to be used if one is a family member or if the message cannot be properly expressed over text. Cases of the latter may even come with restrictions. One person that Turkle interviewed claims that it was easier to deal with traumatic news without immediately speaking about

Today, he says the two spend more evenings staring at their phones than they do at each other.” (Morris). The article provides information that families are affected by technology and can not keep conversations or continue relationships. Similar to Montag and his wife being so intrigued in their technology they forget about each other and the bond they could have if they had conversations after work or at the end of the night rather than making their devices seem more important to them. “If one partner in the relationship disengages from a face-to-face interaction while engaging in technology...the other person may experience a sense of threat to their need to feel attached and in control in that relationship.” (Morris). The lack of communication in a relationship due to technology seems to push away others in the friendship or relationship, the article proves that when others are more interested in their phone or other devices other party/parties feel distant and pushed away and do not want to continue the relationship.People can start building stronger relationships by putting down their pieces of technology and making time to have a real conversations with the people they

"Saying Goodbye California Sun, Hello Midwest" made the most sense to me in why people opt to move. Essentially, the example the authors gave is a family that moves from crowded California to open Missori, where cost of living is cheaper. People are leaing California due to the increase in cost of living; people are moving out to find a more economical way of life. Similar to the article, "New to Oregon: The chase of a fresh start rewards a refugee with a richer life," the author expalins that their inckling for travel stems from the idea that, "Moving is, sometimes, a search for absolution -- a hope that what we've found vindicates all that we've left behind." Perhaps in that sentence is why anyone moves at all. That's what creates demographic change. People seeking job opportunities in other places to find one they are satisfied with, or people finding family and community that supports

Family seems to be a big topic in manys books but even bigger on the web and through cyberspace. Perry Patetic in his excerpt argues that our highly mobile and growing society is creating a lack of relationship with family and friends. The author supports his argument by first explaining how easy it is to just move away. He continues by explaining how far we do travel when we do move away and by what mode of transportation. The authors purpose is to persuade the audience to not travel far from family and stay relatively close so that relationships can be kept, preserved, and maintained. The author establishes a sincere tone for families. The authors argument is invalid because we are in the age of online technology and services that allow us to see family from afar and cherish the few moments that we get in person.

Getting the family together for the holidays may be a little harder when they are 1000 miles apart. Perry Patetic in his passage, claims that it is too easy to move away from the friends and family of our past, this creates a loss in friendship and or relationships. Patetic supports his argument by first explaining why people are able to move so far away. He continues by comparing the differences between a close relationship to a long distance relationship. The authors purpose is to point-out the struggle of a long distance relationship in order to change one’s opinion on the topic. The author displays a sincere tone for the newer generation.

Stanley Eitzen decries the increasing loneliness that has come with advancement in technology and modernity. For instance, the writer asserts that the present day generation is socially inactive as compared to the past generations. Generally, the apparent isolation that people have found themselves in can be largely attributed to technology. Often times, people find themselves using their mobile phones and computers as opposed to engaging in personal face-to-face communications. In effect, this increases communication between individuals but largely reduces intimacy. Other than technology, the types of modern lifestyles that people have embraced have led to isolation, as people tend to live in social and racial settlements. The state of isolation, the author argues, has many disadvantages as it leaves individuals susceptible to unlawful organizations, such as terrorist groups and evil cults. I wholly conquer with these sentiments.

Author Nancy Darling explains the problems that children may have when they move in her article “Moving Is Tough for Kids.” Moving can be a strong negative emotion for kids who are going to live somewhere else because it can interrupt the important relationship that they have. However, sometimes the problems in family exist before such as adolescence problems (puberty), a possible divorce, or a job loss, in addition moving can make it worse. Moreover, children may have negative response such as acting out, uncontrollable, and excitable. In this case, the best solution is technology because keeps children related with each other using the video chatting, video games, and cell phones; as a result, the separate friends suffers less.

Despite the time people spend on technology devices, many seem to have a love/hate relationship with technology and social media, and the way it connects them to each other, to the world. Sherry Turkle, author of the article “Can You Hear Me Now?”, written in 2007, makes the statement, “Thanks to technology, people have never been more connected—or more alienated” (506). The title, “Can You Hear Me Now?” pokes fun of people receiving spotty cell phone service that threatens to disconnect their call; moving around hoping to improve the connection, and repeating the well-worn words, “Can you hear me now?” Practically everyone with a cell phone has said them. While Turkle’s argument might seem ineffective to some, she persuasively used her research to relate that people are, indeed, very connected to each other by technology and social networks, leashed to their devices, and yet, more disconnected or alienated than ever from their closest groups of friends and family.

“According to 2014 data from Pew Research, 90 percent of American adults carry a mobile phone and more than 58 percent of people carry smartphones that offer not only voice and text communication, but also internet, email, and social media access.” Mobile Devices Are Detrimental to Personal Relationships from the point of view of Mobile Devices on Personal Relationships. Whether it is checking your phone at the dinner table, or googling a math question, technology becomes a world, easy to be sucked into. Every day we turn to technology to fix our problems or to ease our mind, but why are we so obsessed with such a time sucking thing? It is safe to say, as a society we rely too much on technology because we are too obsessed with

Nowadays, with the non-stop developments of socioeconomics, it is an undeniable truth that technologies and social networks are playing a vital role in our daily life. We have come to the new era of communication when people can contact each other everywhere, at every moment. Thus, technologies are now the dominant factor in our communication today, since we have such an exceptional access to information and people. Truly, geographic limitation is now destroyed in terms of communication. However, we are becoming more ignorant about how these technologies are affecting our life every day. We are abusing these communicating methods without

For many decades, living out the American dream has meant living in the suburbs, surrounded by a white picket fence, with two and a half children, far from the noisy city. However, many people claim that in a couple years, the suburbs will be no more, and everyone will commence the migration back to the city. In order to understand this debatable topic, it is important to explore the rise of suburbs and what caused people to move out miles away from their place of work and center city in the first place.

The audio story Want to Perk up Your Love Life? Put Away That Smartphone National Public Radio (2014), informs people of an issue that has developed in relationships called technoference. Stating that the use of technology is interfering in relationships such as, going out on a date with your significant other. The issue is resulting in one another to feel not included or unimportant while in the company of each other. Technology has provided us with the ability to stay socially connected at work, with friends, or to find any information at any time for example, checking the score of a football game. Chayko (2017) stated that, “with mobility, this kind of connectivity can take place almost constantly” (p. 131). People develop many different

To begin with, moden technology both unites and divides us, according to Thomas L. Friedman, whose article “The Taxi Driver” clearly represents the effects of today’s electronical devices on our lives. Sometimes even though we are physically close to a person, it often feels like there is a great distance because of distractions caused by devices such as smartphones, iPods, laptops, etc. Therefore, we often miss the chance to get to know foreign or extraordinary personalities, as Friedman for instance relates in his article.

Technology has revolutionized communication and the world like nothing before. The Internet has given the world a freedom never explored in the past. The Internet has broken communication barriers to an extreme level. Now day’s two people from two different countries can talk or chat without interactions. Internet has given people the ability to connect forever through social networking. Some of the biggest world social networking services are Facebook and Twitter. Through technology communication is made much easier, but the communication with the people that are right next to us might be getting weak. Technology has its positive and negative impacts on society. It could keep us informed, but it could also affect anyone’s communication life. Even though it’s an easy communication barrier it’s being over used by society every day. The Internet has charge everyone and everything over the years, it has giving us the ability to be informed on a much deeper level. Families are losing their communication, but not just because of technology. Not everything is positive when it’s about technology. It could help us connect no matter the distance, but we could lose communication and relationships. The world has not yet notice that losing important face to face communication because of technology it’s important.

Have you ever thought that our economy and society are growing really fast? Well Perry Patetic in his short story, “ Fast Moving Society,” argues that the reason for families and friends splitting up is because of the lack of communication and because the automobiles are too expensive. The author supports his argument by first explaining that cars planes and other automobiles makes it easier for people to move away. He continues by saying that due moving away from family and friends we tend to lose track of old friends we never see again. The author’s purpose is to try and say that due the fast moving society it is making it easier for families to split up and he is basically saying that not all families have the money to travel and so basically families should live closer together. The author establishes a formal tone for the audience that