Thomas AquinasDocument Against Cosmetic Animal Research?

Millions of animals every year are being used in labs to test cosmetics. This problem has become a worldwide issue and the U.S. needs to make a change by prohibiting the use of animals in testing cosmetics for safe use.

Introduction, animals that are being tested safety of their products that’s been a subject of an intense debate for over 10 years. While, a lot of people that alleged animals, the remained animals are being subjugated by the research cosmetics companies all over the country/all over the world. Even though, the scientists frequently profit from animal research, I don’t think all the suffering, the pain, and the animals dying are worth just trying find out the human benefits from the products.

Everyday cosmetic products that many people use, such as lipsticks, shampoo, face wash, etcetera, are verified to be safe using animal testing. Chemical burns and other short term ailments are very serious concerns that plague Americans and the knowledge that the products they use will not harm them and their families is possible because of animal testing. Also long term effects, such as cancer, have been discovered through animal product testing and promptly stopped saving countless lives. “NOT TESTED ON ANIMALS YOU’RE THE GUINEA PIG” (Source C). Living day to day with the risk that the products trusted to use on your children and yourself is enough to validate

When cosmetics and diseases popped up scientists didn’t want to test cures on humans, so they test cures and cosmetics on animals. At first it was little things that weren’t a problem, then they went too far. Animals are starved, shocked, burned, and poisoned as scientists look for something that just might yield some human benefit. In one case, baby mice had their legs chopped off so that experimenters could observe whether they 'd learn to groom themselves with their stumps. In another, polar bears were submerged in a tank of crude oil and salt water to see if they 'd live. And, for those experiments which do have merit, there exist many non-animal alternatives.

Testing on humans, they have the ability to confirm consent and can withdraw if they feel uncomfortable with the effects of the experiment, however, animals do not have these options. Technology is developing every day to provide more methods for research even within the cosmetic field.

Revlon and Avon then stopped animal testing. Animal testing will always be debated because cosmetic companies need to test their products before selling them to guarantee they aren't harmful. Animals are most likely their easiest resource to test because testing on humans isn't realistic and more issues would arise. These scientists are more worried about the brand rather than the animals they might be

Experimentation on animals has been a controversial issue for hundreds of years and is still a major issue today. However, we have continued to experiment on animals to test the effects of products such as makeup. Both Peter Singer and Tom Regan would have strong opinions against this experimentation, but they would also have different ways of expressing their view on the topic. They have expressed that animals should be considered to a certain extent that humans and other animals should be treated with some form of equality. While Peter Singer and Tom Regan would have similar goals in this situation, there are many parts of their arguments against animal experimentation that are different. The following will explain how both Peter

The tension between animal rights and medical/cosmetic research is an extreme issue in today’s society. Every day millions of mice, rats, rabbits, primates, cats, dogs, and other animals are locked inside cold, barren cages in laboratories across the country. They languish in pain, ache with loneliness, and long to roam free and use their minds, but all they can do is sit and wait in fear of the next terrifying, painful procedure that will be performed on them next. Animal Research is a very well known act and has been around for some time. Most of the advancements in the 20th century are because of animals. Many of the products we use each day from medicines to household products are tested generally on animals. Many people around the world think animal research is the right thing to do because of the benefits humans may receive from it. Humans often benefit from successful animal research, although, the pain, the suffering, and the deaths of animals are not worth the possible human benefits. Animals and people are alike in many ways; they feel, think, behave, and experience pain. Animal testing is by far the most heartless act anyone could preform; it is inhumane; there are other alternatives and results are not necessarily reliable.

Animal testing should not be used in cosmetic industries as a source of experimentation because it is unethical and inefficient. It is a cruel way of trying to find results that are not even always trustworthy. Everyone has a different reaction to different chemicals so why even bother animals for testing? Also different species can respond differently when exposed to the same chemical so animal testing can be inefficient. The results from animal tests can be quite variable and difficult to interpret therefore it may not be applicable to human beings. Thus, consumer safety still cannot be guaranteed even after these gruesome tests which are totally unethical. It is also unethical to torture and end the lives of these animals each year for our own luxury. Everyday cosmetic industries are using defenseless animals very cruelly just to carry out some most often useless tests. Instead they should use other alternatives which has been proved to yield better and accurate results than tests involving animals.

Another way that animal research is justified is if the research is legitimate for human health issues. Animals that are used in studies to test the effects of beauty products do not deserve to be experimented on. However, in research for actual health issues, animal usage is justified. In an article written by Sheryl Gay Stolberg, “Debate over whether to defend animal tests,” she explains a study done by Dr. Podell. Podell says the study could not be done in people, but he says he did make an ethical calculation: “it's a small number of animals to get information to potentially help millions of people.” It is important for people to understand that a small amount of animals can equal a large gain. Millions of people can benefit from the

First of all, using animals for cosmetic purposes is unnecessary because it puts them through pain no living being should go through. The animals have to unwillingly participate in painful test for people to have various types of cosmetics. According to Barbara James the animals are force feed the products until around fifty percent of them die. Another reason of why it is unnecessary is because we already have a variety of products on the market today. Do we really need a new shampoo every few weeks to months? If the products are practically the same then why do we continue to test them on innocent animals? The products we use today are working then we should

I stand in affirmation of Mathew R. Bailey’s claim on animal research, because animal testing is done for the greater good. Most animal lovers would say no to animal testing, yet without testing, we would not have medications to cure viruses and such in humans and animals.

First of all, animals are used by the cosmetic industry for safety reasons. Using animals to test the safety of a product is unnecessary because cosmetics can be animal cruelty free instead, the reason for choosing cruelty-free cosmetic is that throughout the world over hundreds and thousands of animals endure unnecessary suffering and due to the annual cosmetic testing they die, and according to the Humane Society International, testing on animals is still illegal in eighty percent of the world. Artificial tissue that is grown in a laboratory has proved to provide better results on how

Over one hundred million animals in the United States each year are burned and crippled in lab testing. If you are a fan of cosmetics you can expect certain makeup companies to test their products on animals. You could also expect over thirty percent of these companies not making business. The history of cosmetic testing companies has been depicted as cruel and inhumane. In the cosmetic industry the employees are funded by the purchases of the people. Now once the buyers have the confirmation that the products they are using are animal tested, their sales will drop tremendously. The cosmetic industry should find a more equitable way to fund the buyers because costs for animal testing causes even more of an ongoing reason as to why more and more of one product is not being sold. These issues result in the extinction of brands and more protests against animal testing. Animal testing is a practice that needs more attention and regulation because it is cruel and inhumane, contains unnecessary animal suffering, and it is a poor way of testing for human diseases and treatments.

Using animals in research and to test the safety of products has been a topic of heated debate for decades. According to data collected by F. Barbara Orlans for her book, In the Name of Science: Issues in Responsible Animal Experimentation, sixty percent of all animals used in testing are used in biomedical research and product-safety testing (62). People have different feelings for animals; many look upon animals as companions while others view animals as a means for advancing medical techniques or furthering experimental research. However individuals perceive animals, the fact remains that animals are being exploited by research facilities and cosmetics