Thomas Paine Revelations Analysis

If a writer or a speaker were to include statements regarding family safety, how would the reader/audience respond? Thomas Paine wrote Crisis NO 1 in 1776, which is the same time the Revolutionary War in in progress. Along with this, the time period was the Age of Reason which the mindset of people included innovative thinking and science. The reason why Paine wrote this is to renew the colonist’s feelings towards the war.

Paine's vehement use of schemes exposes the intertwined relationship between the government and the governed, as he interjects, "Interchange will establish a common interest with every part of the community, they will mutually and naturally support each other and on this…depends the strength of the government, and the happiness of the governed"(par. 2). This delicate, yet critical balance of the people versus the state is what this country has been about from the very beginning of it, a place where there will not be the acted upon, but those who act, a place where choice has become the most important part of life, the very center of life itself, affecting both individuals, communities, and this nation as a whole. This catching parallel structure is also used in the final paragraph as Paine expresses: "However our eyes may be dazzled with show, or our ears deceived by sound; however prejudice may warp our wills, or interest darken our understanding, the simple voice of nature and of reason will say, it is

Although Thomas Paine wrote Common Sense to express displeasure towards the british regime, his greater purpose was to rally the colonist against the tyranny of the mother country, therefore establishing inalienable rights that would become the groundwork of the United States.

Paine ends his piece by applying the use of biblical allusions, thereby allowing him to effectively appeal to the soldiers’ sense of spirituality, as this pamphlet was written at a time in which faith and the belief in God was common place. Discouraged by their recent setbacks, Paine provides a boost in the soldiers’ morale by presenting his personal opinion that, “God Almighty will not give up a people to military destruction, or leave them unsupportedly to perish…” These uplifting words provide the opportunity for the troops to renew their faith in God and further inspire them to pursue their cause. Paine strengthens his claim by going on to say that, “I cannot see on what grounds the king of Britain can look up to heaven for help against

He argues in his book that it was one of the biggest mistakes in history to bring a monarchy succession. Paine thinks it is very important for people to understand that man originally was in the state of equality, which means that inequality was caused by some certain circumstances which are in America’s case, the British occupation. Originally, there were no kings, until the ancient Jews demanded one, and from here it started. Paine considers this as a sin because god only should rule over the people. The ancient Jews asked the prophet Samuel to have a king, at first he tried to dissuade them, but he couldn’t. They insisted on having a king, until they had one. This story in Paine’s opinion must be known by everyone in order to understand what is happening in America, and why they should face it and stop it. A revolution must be held by people who understand the situation, and why it is wrong, Paine had the evidence to prove that the British in America is wrong, and that they must have no king and a heredity succession. Thus, they have to make a Revolution, which is the American Revolution, urging for America’s Independence.

Thomas Paine’s The Age of Reason cites contextual reasons for not believing the Bible; while Jonathan Edwards’ sermon, A Divine and Supernatural Light, gives divine reasons for believing the Bible. Thomas Paine’s The Age of Reason, he takes issue with what the Bible calls revelations (aka special revelations). He gives revelations the definition of, when pertaining to religion, as the “something communicated immediately from God to man (510)”. Thus, when a revelation is given from God to man and is then passed on from one person to the next. Paine considers this not to be a true revelation, because he believes a revelation only to that person and to no other. If said revelation were to be applied to others, it would, according to Paine, be hearsay. Because of this Paine believes that the

Expressing Paine’s views that a revolution was inevitable due to a number of insurmountable problems, written in a way that his audience, everyday colonial Americans, could understand. He expresses his ultimate view that “The authority of Great Britain over this continent is a form of government which sooner or later must have and end (Paine 25)” and that end is

Paine argues that the only way to understand a Deity is to study the Creation, and all aspects contained within it, through logic and reasoning and that the faith texts, such as those used in Christianity, Judaism, and Islam, that claim to be the word of God are fraudulent and thusly the dogmas created from these texts fraudulent morals. Paine cites the stories of Jewish, Christian, and Islamic holy works, as he recalls from memory in Part I since he admits he does not have copies to view until Part II, and what he has been taught about ancient religions and cultures (i.e. Roman and Greek), and various theories throughout several realms of science as he makes his arguments. As a scientist, I find his arguments to be of sound logic, yet as

The political essay, Common Sense by Thomas Paine, published in 1776 before the American Revolution convinced the colonial people of need for liberty. Paine, a highly educated man, used three rhetorical devices logos, pathos, and ethos in order to convince the people of his cause. In order to persuade the colonial people fully, Paine catered his arguments to the economist’s logic, the parents’ love, and the religious man’s faith.

By saying this he portrays his incredible level of independence and knowledge. Expanding on his deist worldview Paine states, “One schoolmaster is of more use than a hundred priests.” By saying this quote, he directly points out that, in his own opinion, knowledge holds the higher value than religion. Though Paine pushed having self-rights and opinions, there will always be those that push against his belief and opinion, such as being “...under constant assault by evangelical Christians for his deist writings,” History.com had stated in an article about him. People became violent with him after sharing his own personal worldview.

Paine may not have been the perfect man but he did have great ideas at least for some people in America. In Hogeland sure essay he describes how pains ideas are greatly divided here in the 21st-century. For example pain talks about not getting religion and politics mixed in with each other, as in don’t let your beliefs in God affect the way a country should be ran “Those objecting to religious-right projects like teaching creationism in schools invoke Paine the Deist, exponent of scientific inquiry. Yet WallBuilders, a conservative Christian organization, cites a 1797 speech in which Paine criticized science teachers for overemphasizing reason and ignoring the "Divine Author." (Hogeland, p69) this is the main theme Hogland is trying to get at. People today are very particular about their politics and how they should be run based on ideas of the past for example, the constitution that was written in the 1700s by the founding fathers of America. People today find this document to be life or death if you want to go against it, its is considered un-American or completely against republicanism and democracy. He is saying people change their views based on what is most acceptable to them at

Paine opens the first paragraph by comparing society and government observing “Society is produced by our wants, and government by our wickedness”. This comparison lays the foundation for Paine’s claim that society is most desirable to

Paine believed that the only power people should have is God and nothing else. He uses figurative language to show the audience how he feels so that they are able to connect to the situation better. “let them call me rebel, and welcome, i feel no concern from it; but i should suffer the

As I stared at the behemoth of a project standing before me at four in the morning, wondering if it would ever be done, I asked myself a simple question: “Why?” Why had I taken on this huge assignment? Why had I come up with this crazy idea? Why had I made this project into something bigger than it had to be? Looking back, the answer is simple - I love a challenge.

The birth of a nation does not happen overnight nor with one word. One can clearly see how words and ideas have an impact on people’s thoughts and writing by examining “The Declaration of Independence” and Thomas Paine’s “Common Sense.” Basically, the two documents echo principles stated in John Locke’s “Second Treatise of Government,” and share a style of expressing their feelings on national issues; the authors examine and give reasons for colonial problems with the government and offer a solution. The tone and audience might vary, but the overall message is similar in its principles, showing the impact Locke and Paine had on such a vital document in our history as the “Declaration of Independence”.