Question 1: War is already a relatively rare phenomenon, although some forms are more common than others, but imagine a world where war is almost unheard of. This scenario is a highly probable outcome of a world populated solely by mature, liberal democracies. There are many benefits of having a democracy as a countries form of government, and less violence is one of them. Whether the violence be interstate wars, civil wars or terrorism, all instances would decrease in the case of a democratic regime. Democracy is defined as a political system in which candidates compete for political office through frequent, fair elections in which a sizeable portion of the adult population can vote. Democracies can also be liberal or illiberal. As …show more content…
We believes it is imperative that all As stay together. To add to the argument that ethnic lines should be drawn, it is well known that As and Bs have a long history of not getting along, this brings fear to State A that ethnic cleansing might occur if the lines are not drawn around them. State B refuses to budge on this topic, they have threatened that if they do not get all the land they want, then they will wage war against State A. In recent history, State B has never gone through on a war threat, but this time may be different. Through intelligence gathering, we have discovered B’s large growth in military and arms. We believe that they have been developing their army and building up weapons supplies for the past few years. According to Daryl Press in “Calculating Credibility”, there is two ways to measure credibility, past action theory and current calculus theory. If I follow the current calculus theory, which Mr. Press believes to be correct, State B’s threat is credible based on military growth and high interest in this new territory. As a result, a bargain through coordination will have to be reached. Both States A and B will have to give a little in our territory dispute to stay inside the bargaining range.
Question 3:
Humanitarian crises are always enormously difficult to handle. Like the current conflict in Syria, there are typically mass killing of civilians, ethnic cleansing and genocide. The United
In the United States, democracy can be perceived as a government being ruled directly by its citizens meaning they are proactively involed in governmental descions; this definition can be found under Participatory
Democracy:is a system of government by the whole population or all of the eligible members of a state,typically through elected representatives. In the Roman Republic they were kind of a democratic because anyone who was in the democratic was allowed to vote. People who were picking the councilmen were able to know who be selected at the end and didn’t tell anyone until everyone was not voting anymore.If people did not live in the democracy they were automatically not able to vote nor would they still be in the democratic society. Democracy of historical of racism was a big deal back in the day because when people heard that there was a big problem
Democracy is a system of government by the whole population or all the eligible members of a state, and is one with representative institutions and a rule of law.
According to Merriam-Webster Dictionary, Democracy is defined as a government in which the supreme power is vested in the people and exercised by them directly or indirectly through a system of representation usually involving periodically held free elections. This definition is accurate in
Democracy, as it is used today, means “ the people rule.” A democracy is a form of government ruled by the people of the country through elections and representation. A democracy is really a form of republic known as a democratic republic. A republic is a government where officials elected by a small group of people that make the important decisions.
A democracy is when the common people are considered as the primary source of political power. Although democracy and absolutism had advantages and disadvantages, democracy was a more effective type of government for it limited royal power and protected the rights of the people socially, politically, and economically. Throughout the seventeenth and eighteenth centuries, tension arose between the two different types of governments, the democracy and absolute monarchs.
So the theory suggests that because democracies externalise their interstate norms, they resolve disputes with other states like them in a peaceful way. Hence domestic inner-state policies influence their foreign policies. However, this proclamation is disputed by C. Layne who argues that the ‘crux’ of this theory is that if the assumption that democracies promote their peaceful inner-state norms and beliefs, then they shouldn’t ever threaten other democracies, especially not in a crisis. I will use the case study of the ‘Trent affair’ to provide evidence of how war was avoided. I will argue that in this case, war was avoided not because of the domestic pacific influence on foreign policy but because of other strategic reasons.
Democracy. A system of government in which, in theory, the people rule, either directly or indirectly. This democracy overviews all of the citizens of the United States. There were lots of compromises that led America to have the government that we have today. Conflict and compromise defines what it means to be a citizen including the Bill of Rights, Checks and Balances, and the Civil Rights Movement.
The debate of humanitarian intervention and the responsibility to protect have been discussed in international relations discourse more seriously within the last 60 years. The major historical developments which have led to an increase in the intensity of these debates have had beneficial and detrimental effects on Earth within the last 20 years. Several factors have contributed to this including; globalization, the rise in international accountability, an increase humanitarian consciousness to prevent major atrocities from occurring, the expansion of territorial to global responsibility of the western world, and the realization of the western world that regional sovereignty no longer accounts for national security. To develop an opinion
A democracy is a government by the people, in which the power is vested in the people themselves. The people then elect representatives who conduct their power in a free electoral system. The Declaration of Independence, which says that all men are created equal, was written on the premise of a democracy.
War and violence are major problems. It does not matter in the world where someone lives, War and violence are always seen and heard. War and violence can affect people in different ways. Humanity has gotten so used to seeing people massacred, murdered, and killed. The young generation are growing up being taught that the best way to solve something is to go to war and kill people. War and violence are making society fall to little pieces.
The key objections to humanitarian intervention include the conflict of interests with the self-interested state and sovereignty, the difficulty of internal legitimacy, the problematical Responsibility to Protect (R2P) doctrine, and the debate over legality of intervention. The issue of morality stands as an overarching issue which touches on all of these. Overall, one finds that despite a moral imperative to intervene, humanitarian intervention should not occur but is perhaps the lesser of a series of evils.
Democracy is a form of government in which all eligible citizens have an equal say in the decisions that affect their lives. Democracy allows eligible citizens to participate equally—either directly or through elected representatives—in the proposal, development, and creation of laws. It encompasses social, economic and cultural conditions that enable the free and equal practice of political self-determination.
Much recent discourse surrounding humanitarian intervention has focused on the responsibility to protect (R2P). Prevention is a key component for good international relations and few would say it is not important, but as evidence to date would show prevention is very ineffective, the legality of military intervention still needs to be debated, as to date there is no consensus. For any intervention to be legitimate, whether unilateral or multilateral, it must comply with international law. So as not to cause any confusion, any situation in which an “intervention” is done with the permission or by request of the state being intervened, should be considered humanitarian assistance as state sovereignty is not breached. This paper will
Theoretically, democracy is a stable form of government where power is in the hands of the people. In a democracy, people have the liberty to elect officials that best represent their interests, and political institutions exist as a result: Benjamin Constant argues in The Liberty of the Ancients Compared with that of the Moderns that “true modern liberty is