Three People That Stand Out As Leaders? Laurence Olivier, Jr., And Edith Nourse Rogers

Have you ever thought what a world without human rights would be like? Mahatma Gandhi, Harriet Tubman, and Emma Watson don’t have to. Notwithstanding, each of them has a different strategy, all three of them want the same thing: for everyone to be granted the same rights. Gandhi’s most prominent goal was for South Africa to become its own country, far from the unforgiving government of Britain. Harriet, unlike the other two, was sworn to secrecy, for freeing slaves was illegal at the time. Emma Watson is the face of HeForShe, a campaign for the advancement of equality of both men and women. These three individuals all persevered through difficult challenges and heroically stood up for what they believe in.

What makes an effective leader? Just because a leader is good doesn’t mean they’re effective and just because a leader is effective doesn’t mean they’re good. Maximilien Robespierre was one of the leaders of France that had a firm grip over the whole country as head of the Committee of Public Safety. Even though Maximilien Robespierre, a philosophical leader during the French Revolution, had many good leadership qualities at first, due to his advancement in authority he became power crazy and started turning on his own colleagues and the people of France.

Throughout history select individuals have been documented as a result of their ability to lead, or lack there of. The documentation over the years has been helpful to historians, scholars, and the general population when trying to better understand the characteristics of a leader. Two of the most memorable leaders in world history are Queen Elizabeth I and King Henry V who both shared the duty of ruler over England at some point in their life. Both Queen Elizabeth I and King Henry V are held in high regard as a result of their accomplishments and their over all success as a leader. This essay will discuss both Queen Elizabeth I and King Henry V in regards to their leadership, how they displayed leadership and the outcomes of their individual leadership processes.

George Washington, Abraham Lincoln, Martin L King Jr., just to name a few, all have one important thing in common, Leadership. Leadership is defined as ‘individuals who are the leaders in an organization, regarded collectively and the activity of leading a group of people or an organization or the ability to do this.’ As I think back on my past, I wonder “Have I demonstrated any leadership abilities?” Leadership takes on a big role in everyone’s life, from school to sports to raising a family or running a business. It comes in a variety of shapes and sizes. Of course, I have not accomplished an impeccable act of leadership like the famous leaders mentioned; however, I believe I have put forth an effort.

Based on our visits to the Cardinal Stage Company and Bloomington Playwrights Project, we have more understanding at those two theatre organizations. Even though they have differences but we can still see the similarities they have which are they all have good management skills and have leaders who have great visions. Therefore, it is not hard to figure out that leadership plays a vital role and is extremely necessary for nonprofit theatre organizations to have good leader. There are different types of leaderships, firs of all, according to A Great Confusion in Theatre Management the transactional leadership and it is defined as “the managerial process whereby a supervisor provides goals and objective and rewards and punishments directed

Justice isn’t being served to all walks of life today, just as it wasn’t yesterday, the day before that, or a five decades ago. This ideology of equality and a perfect utopia is flawless in theory but is never quite able to be obtained. Throughout the decades, humanitarians such as Martin Luther King, Jr., Nelson Mandela and Susan B. Anthony have stepped up to the plate and reached out to world in hopes of initiating changes to come. Though outstanding alterations have been made, society is still witnesses unfair treatment of specific racial and religious groups and individuals of different genders, sexuality and economic status. If inspected even closer, one could even defend the conclusion that in today’s day and age, society’s tolerance

Martin Luther King Jr. had illustrated civil disobedient to the world during a challenging time, by quoting inspirational words from Gandhi and Thoreau. Gandhi had also quoted Thoreau throughout his stimulating time. Before Martin Luther King and Gandhi, Thoreau exemplified civil disobedience in the 1800’s. The purpose of Thoreau’s civil disobedience was to make a different world. King and Gandhi had the same purpose. That is one of the main reasons why they connected to Thoreau’s essay.

Martin Luther King Jr. and Rosa Parks, were given a lot of credit for the success of the Montgomery movement because of their leadership and respect throughout the black community. But, they couldn’t achieve such success without a community of people doing their part. The MIA members believed in their leaders, as a result the members had the will to protest, even at their weakest points they kept on protesting. Furthermore, there were also whites who supported the boycott in which many of them sent in money and used cars to help out the movement. The actions that led Montgomery officials to integrate the buses, was when 50,000 customers suddenly stop using the bus and over half of those customers are black. And this action impacted Montgomery

This source is a magazine article on Sun Tzu, Napoleon Bonaparte and Thomas Jonathan "Stonewall" Jackson similar battle techniques that I found on the database History Reference. All three of the commanders mentioned were ingenious, and this article discusses the tactics they employed: celerity (speed/swiftness), shaping the enemy, and exploiting victory. Despite the genius of all three commanders this article provided, I only focused on one, Napoleon Bonaparte, because he is my person of eminence. Napoleon highly valued time and believed the loss of it "irreparable in war." He used celerity to gain the advantage of surprise. For example, a rapid flanking march toppled much of the allied forces' command structure at Ulm, Germany, in October

World War One was a devastating war that killed millions of innocent lives and destroyed the hopes and dreams of countless citizens of the world. The Treaty of Versailles was meant to be a beacon of light in a crushed world, and put an end to future wars forever. The Treaty of Versailles was a negotiation of peace that was signed at the end of World War One. The Treaty took place in Paris at the Palace of Versailles where both Allies and Germany signed. The three most important politicians/leaders were David Lloyd George from Britain, Clemenceau from France, and Woodrow Wilson from America. The Treaty of Versailles punished Germany by taking away territory, reducing the size of the their military, and pressuring the German economy to almost

Have you ever felt that none of your thoughts matter to the world? That you just

One his plays, Romeo and Juliet, Hamlet, Macbeth, and many more were hits became the start of his career. Also another accomplishment was the Globe Theater and making the plays amazing and entertaining. He also was a very successful actor ever since he moved to london before he wrote his plays. He was successful in making comedies fall into a drama seen. He was a very wealthy man and supported his family. He became a very be loved person, actor, playwright, and social list and even the queen of England enjoyed his plays.

Martin Luther King Jr., Abraham Lincoln, and George Washington. What do all of these men have in common? Outstanding leadership skills. Skills such as respect, responsibility, and being an example, show a true leader.

Throughout history, individuals have made great changes in society. Three individuals that have changed history were Genghis Khan, William the Conqueror, and Hernan Cortes. These three individuals have changed many things in three different places. Genghis Khan had changed nearly all of Asia and parts of Europe with his massive empire. William the Conqueror had changed England and ruled it with an iron fist. And Hernan Cortes completely destroyed the Aztec Empire and changed how people would live in the Americas. Each continent or land was much different before that individual had came, the individual had to take specific actions in order to change his region and each region was changed either in a negative or positive way.

Mahatma Ghandi once said, “I object to violence because when it appears to do good, the good is only temporary; the evil it does is permanent.” Although Gandhi is completely against violence, I believe that violence can be justified depending on the cause of it. If violence is used in the act of defense from an aggressor, then it is acceptable. However, in any other case, violence is unjustified. Looking back in history, several examples can be appreciated where violent paths were chosen. If those scenarios are analysed today, one can realize that peaceful options were available, but not chosen. Individuals like Martin Luther King Jr and Mahatma Ghandi both used peaceful methods to reach their own respective objectives. Mahatma Gandhi used non violent protests to break the British rule and Martin Luther King Jr followed suite with his own non violent methods including the famous Selma march for social justice. However, there are some circumstances where violence is the only answer. For example, during World War II, the Allied forces were compelled to fight back against the aggressive Nazi Forces in order to protect the larger population. Additionally, I believe that positivity can not be a result of reacting to conflict or danger with violence. As Gandhi said, the evil that derives from violence far outweighs the short term positives. As I look back at my cherished childhood books and movies, I realize that in most cases, violence was showcased to solve problems rather than