Three Wheels: Which Of Your Devices The Best Motion

A trip consisted of one revolution. Six stops were made for loading and then one, nine minute, nonstop revolution. The fare for the trip was 50 cents. Ferris and his wife were the first to ride it along with the city’s mayor and a 40 piece band. The wheel was a huge success. It earned $726, 805 and $395,000 in profit. Several couples were married at the top of the wheel because of its beauty and fame. 3000 light bulbs were on the wheel to create a beautiful sight as they blinked. The wheel made 10,000 revolutions and carried 1.5 million passengers. The wheels last days were nearing. It ran smoothly until November 6, 1893, when the exposition ended. $400,000 in new debt and investors sold the structure for $1,800. It was reassembled in ST Louisiana for the Louisiana Purchase Exposition. Three million new riders enjoyed the wheel. The exposition soon closed because of complaints that the wheel was an eyesore. After the exposition, the wheel was moved to Chicago. Residents there petitioned to have the wheel removed. They stated that it was useless and undesirable. On May 11, 1906, 200 lbs. of dynamite reduced the wheel to a pile of scrap metal.

Instructions: Complete a five year simulation, and answer the following questions on the actual approach you used for the simulation. You may type your answers directly on this form, but the completed document must be 2-3 pages in length (please do not change the margins). Due November 25, 11:59pm

#1. I believe that decreasing the diameter of the front wheels will significantly impact on the distance that the mousetrap car will travel this

The object furthest to the right is the motion detector that will measure the object's position and time and send it to the LabQuest. The object to the far left is the stopper that will stop the cart after it has completed its run. The materials we needed to complete this lab was a motion detector, a cart, ruler, cart track, and LabQuest. The motion detector measured the time as soon as the cart was set in motion and delivered the data to the LabQuest. The cart was used to measure the velocity for each run. The cart track was the medium we used to push the cart down and collect

Researchers should develop custom instruments (suitable to their needs) to study the cycling transportation performance, since there are no dedicated instruments in this field of research. In this study, we developed an operational Instrumented Probe Bicycle (IPB) that is designed, built, and tested. The IPB is a completely mobile system capable of collecting a variety of empirical data. Several IPBs have been created around the world, which are different from each other based on the type of data needed. Accordingly, data collection from IPB divides into two basic categories, internal bicycle data and external bicycle data. The internal data represent the bicycle movement characteristics (e.g. speed, and acceleration), or direct influences

With the wheel spinning at 30km/h, each brake was applied for three seconds and then left to recover for 10 seconds. This cycle was repeated 15 times. The results were then averaged out to provide a single

First, The procedures of were take an energy car and roll it down a track with a without a sail and record the data from photogate A to B and the time to took to get there make sure the photogate are 555 cm away from each other. Do the same one energy car wit just wheels and one with one 3 times each.

3. Measure and mark 30cm on the ramp with tape. This will be our effort distance.

I was assisting Mrs x who was not too well but Mrs x was fully mobile and only required assistance of one staff while walking Mrs x to the lavatory she felt dizzy and was about to fall I grabbed hold of her at once I shouted for more help.

At 1 second, the mousetrap car was traveling at a speed of 3.2m/s and as the mousetrap car moved down the track, at 5 seconds, the mousetrap car was traveling at a speed of only .98 m/s. The difference between the speed at 1 second (3.2 m/s) and 5 (.98 m/s) seconds was 2.22 m/s, the speed of the mousetrap car decreased 2.2 m/s as the car moved down the track. If I would’ve done this experiment at home, I would’ve improved it by letting one group go at a time because the noise from the other groups around the room interfered with our data once or twice. An experimental error that occurred during the lab was that once, the line on the graph increased at a smaller rate than the other trials. This was because we released the mousetrap car too early and because the car was father away from the motion detector at the start the motion detector picked up the car’s movement from 3 seconds to 5 seconds. Extension suggestions I have for a new experiment is, I would extend the trials so we would stop recording the positon the mousetrap car when the mousetrap would stay completely

The aim of the experiment is to examine how the acceleration of the car differs when the angle of inclination of the ramp is amplified and to record and analyse findings.

Many things can’t be explained, but I have explained a few things that might seem confusing. If distance equals rate times time, than how fast the object is going, and how long the object is staying in the air is key. The machine that works faster and keeps the object in the air longer should be better than the other. Unless there is a difference in the objects, as such as one might be lighter, or float to stay in the air longer. Or if one object is more aerodynamic than the other.

I have been a student here at SDJCC for a year now. Since I’ve been here, the policy has always been to let students walk off center with a pass, or leave on center transportation. But since receiving the terrible news that a job corps student, who was a minor, was killed in Florida, minor students at all job corps centers are not allowed are not allowed to walk off center at any time, not even on the weekends unless someone comes to pick you up. I’m a minor and this is of great concern to me.

The main feature allowing this device to work was a special gear created by Leibniz which is now known as the Leibniz wheel. This was a piece that played the role of a mechanical multiplier. This piece was simply a metal cylinder with nine horizontal rows of teeth. The first of these rows ran one-tenth the length of the cylinder. The second row ran two tenths, and so on until the nine-tenths. The device had eight of these mechanisms linked to a shaft in the center. Turning the shaft rotated all the cylinders, which rotated the wheels that showed the user their

A rightward moving rider gradually becomes an upward moving rider, then a leftward moving rider, then a downward moving rider, before finally becoming a rightward-moving rider once again. There is a continuing change in the direction of the rider as he/she will moves through the clothoid loop. A change in direction is one thing of an accelerating object. The rider also changes speed. As the rider begins to climb upward the loop, he/she begins to slow down. What we talked about suggests that an increase in height results in a decrease in kinetic energy and speed and a decrease in height results in an increase in kinetic energy and speed. So the rider experiences the greatest speeds at the bottom of the loop. The change in speed as the rider moves through the loop is the second part of acceleration which the riders experiences. A rider who moves through a circular loop with a constant speed, the acceleration is centripetal and towards the center of the circle. In this case of a rider moving through a noncircular loop at non-constant speed, the acceleration of the rider has two components. There is a component which is directed towards the center of the circle (ac) and relates itself to the direction change and the other component is directed tangent (at) to the track and relates itself to the car's change in speed. This tangential component would be