Tigard Work Case Study

Declaire informed HS that Mr. Palmer is unemployed at the moment because client is undocumented. As per Ms. Declaire this issue makes it hard for Mr. Palmer to find a job. Also, client stated that he is not looking, everyone turn him down. Ms. Declaire stated that she is employed at moment and earns about $1200 a month. Family PA case is active at this moment.

a morning class on Friday. She told me she would look into it and get back with me. I also sent her an email in

Medical: Ms. Williams failed to submit her medical documentation. Ms. Williams is expected to submit her medical evaluation or physical by 03/2017. Case Manager explained to Ms. Williams that if she failed to submit the documents required she would be considered as non-compliance.

Ms. Balgobin also said she did not work from November 1st through November 14th because she was in the hospital. She did not report being out of work to Hildebrand until this PC. She did not submit any documentation showing to support this nor did she request a rent adjustment.

The Department’s Representative contends that the household was receiving benefits and was due for renewal. The household consisted of the Appellant’s husband who is receiving Home and Community Based Service benefits under the MA program and the Appellant was receiving State payment of her Medicare Part B Premium. The Appellant’s total monthly income was Social Security benefits in the amount of $855.00 and a monthly annuity in the amount of $66.00, totaling $921.00. The Appellant’s spouse received income of $767.00 from Social Security benefits. The total household income was combined

02/09/2017 to 02/10/2017: Nadya immediately pulled up her TMS and prioritized her work, asked Mentor if OK to start her CF RRR without mentor listening in and process it without aid for mentor. Nadya is very analytical on her approach to every case. She will review all aspects of eligibility before starting any task. If questions arise; She asks and verifies that the steps she will be taking are correct by asking and with screen prints. 02/14/17 to 02/15/17 Nadya was ready to work; Nadya pulls up her TMS and prioritizes her tasks for the day. She had all her training material out and was ready to process. Nadya followed the CalWIN print screen procedure and waited for review from mentor before making changes or authorizing the benefits. After

She tanked us and said will contact us if she needs help with her certification

With her not being able to tell me much on some subjects she Hit several instead of just talking about one. I simply asked her to tell

On March 4, 2015, the subpoena sent to the address at 3412½ 7th Street, Tuscaloosa, Alabama 35401 was returned stating, moved; unable to forward. The subpoena sent to the address at 3758 8th Street, Tuscaloosa, Alabama 35401 has not returned. The agency has no notice of where that subpoena went. On May 5, 2015, the CP showed for the court hearing and was tested. A court hearing was scheduled for June 2, 2015. A court notice was mailed to the address at 3412½ 7th Street. The CP did not appear for the June 2, 2015 hearing. Therefore, a sanction was sent. According to Child Support Policy and Procedure Manual 5.10.1 which states, each person receiving child support services, regardless of whether (s)he is TANF or non-TANF, is required to cooperate with DHR. That includes activities such as, which is listed in Policy 5.10.1.B.2, appearing as a witness at judicial or other hearings or proceedings. In Policy 5.10.3.A, states when the CP in a TANF, foster care, or Medicaid-only case does not cooperate with IV-D activities, DHR must notify the appropriate referring agency, which in this case would be the Family Assistance of its client’s non-cooperation, which Child Support did notify TANF of this on June 4, 2015 for a sanction to be done. Another court hearing was

She had more than 3 or more absences within a 3-to-4 week period. Sometimes, she cannot provide a valid excuse for absenteeism or lateness, per Instructor. She was late on 03/10/2017. Also, she was late on March 03, 2017; however, she provided an excuse from her dentist. Additionally, Ms. Clemons was absent the entire week of April 10, 2017 thru April 14, 2017. Ms. Clemons was mailed a letter on April 11, 2017 regarding her continued interest in the CRP. Ms. Clemons contacted Evaluator and stated that she will return 04/17/2017. Evaluator met with Ms. Clemons on 04/19/2017 for individual counseling to discuss her excessive absenteeism and the rules and regulations of AbilityWorks’ attendance policy. They also discussed an attendance contract within the next review period if her attendance did not improve.

Seltzer’s testimony revealed that prior to being on welfare earlier years; she had no knowledge that her benefits had ever been reduced. Ms. Seltzer stated in the past her benefits always just been cutoff, but this time when she missed her appointment, she was trying to put her children on the bus. She stated it was not that she was trying not to cooperate, she had several things going on, but the decision is up to DHR. She stated that she is not objecting to what is going on; she understands that you cannot miss two appointments. She stated she asked for the hearing because she had rather receive a decrease in benefits; the benefits are for her

This counselor received a call from Austin's job developer Kathy with New Horizon's. She stated that Austin was hired by Marshall's on Friday and was supposed to start orientation on Saturday. Kathy stated that over the weekend she received a voicemail from Austin stating he didn't take the Marshall's job because it’s too far and his parents can’t get him there and back. She then stated that she spoke with him this morning and he stated that he didn’t go to orientation nor did he call the employer to tell them he wasn’t going and the reason why. Kathy stated she explained to him how this doesn't look good and suggested that he call and apologize. Austin stated he would. He then proceeded to tell Kathy that Kroger called him and will call him

GAO called constituent, she complained about her SNAP benefit was not processed since August, when she re-applied. Per TRACS # 284 of 08/22/16, her application has been pended for proof of income. She is working in two different places. She works for Metropolitan Family Services and for School Reynolds.

After speaking briefly with Amy via e-mail on my next step, she suggested I send a note to open discussion; Thank you Amy.

The first subject that I talked to her about was special education. She believes that special education