Tigard Work Case Study

Ms. Balgobin also said she did not work from November 1st through November 14th because she was in the hospital. She did not report being out of work to Hildebrand until this PC. She did not submit any documentation showing to support this nor did she request a rent adjustment.

The Department’s Representative contends that the household was receiving benefits and was due for renewal. The household consisted of the Appellant’s husband who is receiving Home and Community Based Service benefits under the MA program and the Appellant was receiving State payment of her Medicare Part B Premium. The Appellant’s total monthly income was Social Security benefits in the amount of $855.00 and a monthly annuity in the amount of $66.00, totaling $921.00. The Appellant’s spouse received income of $767.00 from Social Security benefits. The total household income was combined

02/09/2017 to 02/10/2017: Nadya immediately pulled up her TMS and prioritized her work, asked Mentor if OK to start her CF RRR without mentor listening in and process it without aid for mentor. Nadya is very analytical on her approach to every case. She will review all aspects of eligibility before starting any task. If questions arise; She asks and verifies that the steps she will be taking are correct by asking and with screen prints. 02/14/17 to 02/15/17 Nadya was ready to work; Nadya pulls up her TMS and prioritizes her tasks for the day. She had all her training material out and was ready to process. Nadya followed the CalWIN print screen procedure and waited for review from mentor before making changes or authorizing the benefits. After

She tanked us and said will contact us if she needs help with her certification

Medical: Ms. Williams failed to submit her medical documentation. Ms. Williams is expected to submit her medical evaluation or physical by 03/2017. Case Manager explained to Ms. Williams that if she failed to submit the documents required she would be considered as non-compliance.

a morning class on Friday. She told me she would look into it and get back with me. I also sent her an email in

Declaire informed HS that Mr. Palmer is unemployed at the moment because client is undocumented. As per Ms. Declaire this issue makes it hard for Mr. Palmer to find a job. Also, client stated that he is not looking, everyone turn him down. Ms. Declaire stated that she is employed at moment and earns about $1200 a month. Family PA case is active at this moment.

She had more than 3 or more absences within a 3-to-4 week period. Sometimes, she cannot provide a valid excuse for absenteeism or lateness, per Instructor. She was late on 03/10/2017. Also, she was late on March 03, 2017; however, she provided an excuse from her dentist. Additionally, Ms. Clemons was absent the entire week of April 10, 2017 thru April 14, 2017. Ms. Clemons was mailed a letter on April 11, 2017 regarding her continued interest in the CRP. Ms. Clemons contacted Evaluator and stated that she will return 04/17/2017. Evaluator met with Ms. Clemons on 04/19/2017 for individual counseling to discuss her excessive absenteeism and the rules and regulations of AbilityWorks’ attendance policy. They also discussed an attendance contract within the next review period if her attendance did not improve.

This counselor received a call from Austin's job developer Kathy with New Horizon's. She stated that Austin was hired by Marshall's on Friday and was supposed to start orientation on Saturday. Kathy stated that over the weekend she received a voicemail from Austin stating he didn't take the Marshall's job because it’s too far and his parents can’t get him there and back. She then stated that she spoke with him this morning and he stated that he didn’t go to orientation nor did he call the employer to tell them he wasn’t going and the reason why. Kathy stated she explained to him how this doesn't look good and suggested that he call and apologize. Austin stated he would. He then proceeded to tell Kathy that Kroger called him and will call him

With her not being able to tell me much on some subjects she Hit several instead of just talking about one. I simply asked her to tell

After speaking briefly with Amy via e-mail on my next step, she suggested I send a note to open discussion; Thank you Amy.

In the novel, The Scarlet Letter, Hawthorne characterizes Pearl with contrasting personalities and roles she plays in Hester’s life. Pearl’s conflicting personality components, innocence and defiance, both derive from her isolation from society, which transpired because of her mother’s sin. Pearl represents the conflict between everything good and dark, which reflects in the role she plays in Hester’s life, as the physical embodiment of the A. While Pearl serves as a savior to Hester, representing possible redemption, she is also Hester’s tormentor, a constant reminder of her sin, and the consequences of disobeying her Puritan nature and religion. Hawthorne’s intent is established in the novel through Pearl’s attachment to the A, the mirror

Napoleon is the new leader of the farm but when he returns the farm to its original name (in chapter 10) it becomes evident he is less pig than he was. When the farm was still under Jones control it was called Manor Farm ,however when the animals took control it was renamed and called Animal Farm. At first there was a mostly fair democratic system which began to be lead by the pigs but nobody questioned that. The very first time the pigs were shown to be cruel and immoral was when they stole the apples and milk. Though the first time things were questioned was when Napoleon took complete power and kicked snowball out.

The first subject that I talked to her about was special education. She believes that special education

The literature review relating to distance education, leadership, student accomplishment, and nontraditional instruction platforms discovered an unqualified absence of research data regarding nontraditional instruction programs, beyond a general narrative of how these initiatives are being implemented in various states. Research concerning technology leadership is more prevalent, but primarily focuses on perceptions and mindsets of principals, teachers, and students rather than on empirical data. Although research has been executed to study the relationship between technology leadership and student achievement, there is a dearth of conclusions specific to the relationship between administrative technology leadership and the impact of