Timeline of Uk Regulatory Events Essay

The aim of this report is to investigate the Douglas Harvey Barber v Guardian Royal Exchange case. The main findings of this report is to see what effect Douglas Harvey Barber had on the financial services industry before and after his case.

The government regulation of the financial industry by the Dodd-Frank Act was the most compelling topic of this class. A financial regulatory process was created which limits risk through the enforcement of transparency and accountability. The main objective of the Dodd-Frank Act was to provide regulation to banks that was more stringent. The FSOC was created as a result of the Dodd-Frank Act. The two main objectives of the FSCO was to stop the occurrence of another recession and to resolve persistent issues. The elimination of bailouts funded by taxpayers was another important element of this act. The CFPB also known as the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau was created as a result of the act. The consolidation of consumer protection responsibilities

Prior to the financial crisis, the overall responsibility for financial oversight was divided among several different agencies. These agencies and their “varying rules and standards led to certain entities not being regulated at all, with others subject to less oversight than their peer

Government departments are instrumental to a flourishing and secure economy. They are in place to serve their constituents and ought to keep that in mind. The Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) fits this well and is in place to ensure that bank users are protected in instances of economic downturn and that their money is insured. In this way, regulation is extremely necessary to ensure a stable economy in instances of financial instability. To completely understand the FDIC, it is important to understand why and how it was created, its history, major responsibilities and who the leaders are.

The regulatory reform process is currently moving from policymaking to the implementation phase. The implications of regulatory reform for banks has never been greater, and the ability to navigate the new environment will require strong processes that integrate regulatory compliance and changes to the business model. Planning has never been more important as reaction to each regulation could be very costly.

The reality of systemic risk made the task of regulating the financial system increasingly complicated, as the crises aren’t contained in one country or market. The extreme inter-dependence between the different agents is the main reason why we need regulation today, as some misconducts can cause a domino effect, affecting markets globally. The structure of the banking system in itself explains this process. In the finance industry, banks borrow money from other banks. If one bank fails, the one who lent the funds in the first place might also follow the same path, creating panic in the markets. The government’s first prerogative is to protect its citizens from these

The 2008 financial crisis should not be the last one readers will experience, but this paper would like to present a picture of how it unfolded and where went wrong, so that hopefully we can learn from it. This paper will address some post-crisis regulations and why regulators responded this way. It concludes that the key is to carry out reforms addressing the moral hazard issue deeply in our current financial system.

The Financial Services Act of 2012 in the UK came into force in 2013 on 1st April. This Act has the government reforms on the financial regulatory structure in the UK. The Act gives the new guidelines on the management of the banking sector and other supervisory roles in the financial services sector. This Act bestowed the oversight role to the Bank of England which is therefore expected to be responsible for the occurrences in the financial system and how the financial institutions manage their balance-sheet risks. This Act also stipulates that three more bodies are to be formed to assist in managing this sector. These bodies include the Financial Policy Committee (FPC), Prudential Regulatory Authority (PRA) and Financial Conduct Authority (FCA). This Act affects significantly the two previous Acts which have been running the sector. These are the Financial Services and Markets Act of 2000 and the Bank of England Act of 1998. In this paper, the Act is clearly analyzed and mostly the effects it has on the Financial Regulatory Regime in the UK (Noked 2013). The economy of the UK has been following a laissez-faire system since 1979 (Allan and Stuart 2011)

Regulation is a topic that has been debated for many years and will continue to be debated for years to come. In the business and finance sector, there are many regulators including but not limited to the Australian Securities and Investment Commission (ASIC), Financial Reporting Council (FRC), Australian Prudential Regulation Authority (APRA) and the Australian Accounting Standards Board (AASB). While these are only a few regulatory bodies in the industry, they all have their own set of regulations to enforce. ASIC, for example, regulate the Corporations Act 2001 along with the Australian Accounting Standards. While ASIC ensure that organisations adhere to the regulations laid out before them, the AASB create and develop those

The regulations the commonwealth enacts to control the conduct of our banks are policed by ASIC and APRA. The ASIC (Australian Securities and Investments Commission) Act 2001 (Cth) contains within division 2, the unconscionable conduct as well as consumer protection provisions in relation to financial services providers that are no longer in the Trade Practices Act. APRA is a body established in 1998 by commonwealth legislation.The role of the Australian Prudential Regulation Authority (APRA) is to oversee the banks, and act as a regulator within the finance industry. (Wentworth, 2007)

The reasons why the regulatory framework is exists is to describe the Financial Services Commission of Ontario (FSCO), how the FSCO fulfills its mandate by achieving regulatory outcomes, FSCO’s core regulatory activities and the principles that FSCO follows when conducting regulatory activities. In the financial services that FSCO regulates, expectations are one of the things that play a very important role. All the customers expected to be treated nicely, fairly and their money from the future pension must be secured. They expect more financial products and more services that should meet the public’s needs from FSCO. The regulatory framework will do its job by summarize the expectations of FSCO from businesses or some individuals that work

The above study is quite relative to the question at hand. It looks intensely at the Financial Services Authority (FSA) in the UK as they look to move regulation from a rules based system to a more principles based one. The study also investigates the factors they believe necessary to make the implementation of this more principle based system

Financial regulation is necessary and without an efficient set of regulations a country could see rises in unemployment, interest rates, and the deterioration of financial intermediaries. With the globalization of the financial industry, it becomes more and more common for businesses to seek financing outside of their county 's boarders. These innovations in the financial industry stress why it is so important for regulations to be created and changed to reduce risk and asymmetric information in financial systems.

At the same time, the regulators should be as transparent as possible and fully accountable. The accountability and transparency of the regulator will increase the credibility of the regulator and in-turn benefit the regulated entity. Types of Financial Regulation Financial regulation in a country can be done either by a single body called a single regulator or multiple bodies co-existing and working together or in a hierarchy of entities known as multiple regulators. A regulator whether single or multiple does not determine the economic standing of a country or its financial strength. Many developed countries of the world follow either the system of single regulation or multiple regulations. Often in times of economic crisis or financial boom in the country’s economy the government of the nation will review its regulatory system and choose to expand or close down some of its regulatory bodies.

In November 2009 the Financial Services Bill was introduced into Parliament. The Bill builds on the action taken so far by the Government in response to the financial crisis, and delivers wide-reaching reforms to strengthen financial regulation, support better corporate governance and provide protection to consumers. The Bill calls for a new Council for Financial Stability which is intended to consist of Treasury, Bank of England and FSA officials. It also requires major banks to hold larger capital reserves and to prepare so-called "living wills".