Tina Tippett Case

In her article “Gendered Racial Violence and Spatialized Justice,” Sherene H. Razack explores the murder of Pamela George; the way that her murderers’ sentences were lessened because of a variety of factors pertaining to Ms. George’s life; and the fact that the murderers were young, white, and middle-class men.

An experienced nurse Julie Thao was taking care of 16-yeas old Jasmine Gant who was about t give a birth. Thao is accused of making a mistake that had terrible and tragic result on the life of a pregnant teenage, unborn child, Gant’s family, health care, and Thao’s life. Thao mistakenly gave Gant an epidural anesthetic intravenously instead of an IV antibiotic for a strep infection. Within minutes of receiving the epidural IV, Gant suffered seizures and died. Her child, a boy, was delivered by emergency Caesarean section and survived. So what caused this tragedy to happen? According to investigation, Thao improperly removed the epidural bag from a locked storage system without authorization, she did not scan the bar code, which would have told

Chung has been operating under what he feels are the established norms for his culture. Ted's relationship with the Taiwanese client exhibits the Chinese management principles of paternalism, particularism, and insecurity. The patron-client relationship is based in a sense of mutual obligation, where the client is expected to defer to Ted's expertise and Ted is expected to trade the account responsibly. (Moorhouse, 2005) Ted also used social networking to establish himself in the community which is expected in the Chinese culture. By attending events Ted increases his “visibility and prestige” which contributes to the face that is needed to be considered a trustworthy business partner

A reflective analysis on a case presented via a video tape of a simulated patient with a minor injury.

The case of Karen Leary illustrates the implications cultural conflict can have on business organizations and office culture. A common mistake managers make is undermining the power of cultural constraints at the organizational level. After six years as a financial consultant at Merrill Lynch, Karen Leary was promoted to general manager at the Elmville branch in Chicago. Leary wanted to achieve success at the branch office by building high-producing, successful group of professionals who work together to provide clients with complete service in meeting long-term financial goals.

-The Issue: were all the elements of a contract present to make the contract enforceable?

Was there a valid offer made when Debbie put an ad in newspaper stating her company Party line will rent tables and chairs for the low price of

this case could be an tricky in the court, because in the contract they only

Once the couple started to get settled into their room, a number of different incidents occurred that could of easily been handled with a properly trained staff that executed 5-star customer service. McKenzie asked for a luggage rack, which was promised immediately and never delivered to his room. McKenzie also made several requests that extra pillows be brought to his room, which were promised and were failed to deliver (Kayalar). With key persistence he was later told, “the hotel did not have extra pillows available.” I want to note that the hotel was not at full capacity, so if proper customer service was instilled in the employees a trip to a vacant room for a pillow could have easily solved this request. The couple in turn requested towels to use to bulk up the flat pillows. Thankfully, the towels were delivered, however, the employee did not address their inconvenience and in fact never said a word or had a smile on their face. Customer service is not only providing the material, but it is also having the face of the employee that is representing the company or business to make a good impression on the guest or client. Another issue with the room was the restocking of everyday

Intro: Belle Gibson, a health blogger and app publisher who claimed to have cured her brain cancer through alternative therapies but in fact she never had the disease. Susie O’Brien published an article ‘Belle Gibson should be charged for deceptive conduct’ in the Herald Sun on the 29th September 2017. O’Brien states how Belle Gibson was found guilty of misleading her followers and that her penalty is not a strong enough message; she should be serving against criminal charges and jail time. O’Brien intensifies the charges placed on Gibson and they are subsequent to the criminal acts she has done. Her tone upon the issue is clearly passionate and logical as she represents this by showing evidence on Belle Gibson to emphasise the issue.

Karen Johnston is a director of a health planning agency which employs approximately 18 staff members and also serves on the Community Advisory Board (CAB). This program typically incorporates two student interns from her health planning agency. The CAB is a vital program as it advises the program faculty on issues that concern curriculum, internships, job placements, and scholarships.

The hearsay rule is based inherently on the concise definition of hearsay. In this regard, hearsay can be defined as any statement other than that made by an individual in the process of testifying at a hearing or trial, which is offered for purposes of affording evidence of truth pertaining to a particular matter. According to the Cornell University Law School (2014), the hearsay rue is the rule that prohibits out of court statements from being admitted as evidence at a trial. B and large, the hearsay rule is motivated intrinsically by the understanding in the belief that hearsay is unreliable. For example, if a witnessed stopped at a scene of a car accident and a survivor intimated to him or her that the driver caused the accident, this statement cannot be admitted as evidence to prove the same. It is imperative to understand that the hearsay rule, according to the Cornell University Law School, bars all such evidence, whether oral or written.

Understandably the Swan disputed the outcome, as they had no prior knowledge of any cancellation fees or paperwork specifying any cancellation policies, due to Tracey not informing them upon booking the accommodation.

By demanding her to do something that is not only illegal, and not in the original script, the contract Stefan agreed upon has deemed the terms to be illusory consideration. Since he thought Wendy did not fulfill her side of the contract, he discharged her, at the same time terminating the contract, by not upholding the level of her expected performance. At this point, this was a breach for Stefan, since he called for performance in such uncertain terms within the agreement. As Wendy left, her contractual obligations were released, but since Stefan was individual who breached the contract, he must pay for any damages and for the appropriate amount of work she has already done. After a few days, Stefan tried calling her back to the set, telling her she does not have to do the stunt in Montana and offering her an additional $1,000 to her weekly pay.

Contract Law Case Study Both the parties in the question have come to a problematic situation