Title IX Gender Equality

The basic Title IX statute provides: "No person in the United States shall, on the basis of sex, be excluded from participation in, be denied the benefits of, or be subjected to discrimination under any education program or

Title IX is a law passed in 1972 that requires gender equity for boys and girls in every educational program that receives federal funding. Title IX states “No person in the United States shall, on the basis of sex, be excluded from participation in, be denied the benefits of, or be subjected to discrimination under any education program or activity receiving Federal financial assistance.(TitleIX1972)” Title IX goes on into more depth and if you wish to learn more about Title IX you can visit ”http://www.dol.gov/oasam/regs/statutes/titleix.htm”,but I will be focusing mainly on this highlight of the law. When analyzing this law

Title XI was created to open doors for women, but not at the expense of closing doors for men. This law rules that a college’s percentage of each gender athletic must coincide with the number of gender enrollment within the school. According to a U.S News article Title XI Dark Legacy, “Colleges pursuing "proportionality" can try to increase the number of female athletes so that women account for 57 percent of athletes, or—the more surefire and less costly path—eliminate male athletes from the roster” (Lukas 1). Why should men get cut just to make sure that there are enough women within athletics? There isn’t any equality in the situation if one or the other sacrifice for the other. College athletics need to try gain more money and more female athletes so they can afford them and males won’t have to get cut. Not only are male players getting cut from rosters, but some male sports are getting cut all together just to accommodate for female sports. In 2007, the College Sports Council conducted an analysis of NCAA data between the years of 1981-2005. They realized the number of female athletes per college increased by 34%, as well at the number of women’s teams. They also realized that the number of male athletes per school decreased by 6% and the number of male teams decreased by 17% (Lukas 1).

First and foremost, Title IX outlawed colleges and universities rejecting applicants because of their gender. Since Title IX has been but in place for over 40 years, there are now more women than men in college, which is a great accomplishment in striving for the next goal in the movement because there is now equality when applying for college thanks to Title IX. Also, many colleges around the nation had to stray away from their traditions because,“The male-only colleges and universities had become coeducational prior to Title IX.” This widened the choice of colleges for women to chose from to fit them, compared to being limited to few school that were all women or excepted few women, which is a vital part of getting a higher education. Meanwhile, Classes and curriculums were changed drastically in high schools too.

Men and women may have different plumbing but that doesn’t mean that their physical and educational rights should be any different. Title IX is a law signed by Richard Nixon in 1972, which gives women the same rights as men pertaining to sports and education. Title IX changed the lives of tons of women across the globe by increasing their educational and career opportunities, reducing their risk of breast cancer and teenage pregnancy, but also by making them and easy way for guys to degrade each other.

Despite the 1975 regulations schools and courts still debated whether the language of Title IX itself included their athletic departments at all. At issue was the Title IX, § 1681(a), phrase dealing with funding: sex-based discrimination in "any education program or activity receiving Federal financial assistance violated Title IX." [3] Depending on whether a party was fighting for or against gender equity compliance under Title IX in the athletics area, that party argued for, respectively, an "institution-wide" or "program-specific" view of this phrase. Supporters of the latter view argued that Title IX forbade gender discrimination only in those specific "programs or activities" receiving direct federal funding. Thus, if an athletic program did not receive any direct federal funding, the regulations and compliance guidelines of Title IX did not apply to it. As seen in

Equality is and has been a very popular and large debating issue in marriages, gender, education and even sports! On June 23, 1972, the Title IX Education Amendment was passed by the government (History.com). The Title IX Education Amendment is composed of several sections, and in section 1681 of the Title IX Amendment it states in simplest of terms that no individual can be denied an education or participation in any school athletic program because of their gender, also included in the amendment they are protected from discrimination under any educational program receiving Federal financial assistance (DOL.gov). The amendment is the reason why we are able have women’s and men’s sports teams in educational settings in addition to many other

Even though institutions are required by law to meet one of those terms, a school rarely complies sufficiently with Title IX. In fact, at a few schools certain opportunities have diminished for women. Since Title IX was passed, women’s teams, at some schools, have shrunk due to death of field hockey in 1991 (Pinney 2). Although it is not required for schools to comply, funding for women’s teams have not been equal either.

Men’s sports teams are dropping however the problem is not the law itself, but how it is enforced. A school can comply with the law in any of three ways: have its number of male and female athletes in proportion to the overall student body; demonstrate it has increased opportunities for women athletes, and continues to; show that its existing athletic program meets the interests of women on campus. Because

While it is true that Title IX has allowed for more equality in the world of sports, some members of society do not accept it and some men consider it reverse discrimination.

This online manual is published by the U.S. Department of Justice. It provides an overview of the Title IX bill included in the Education Amendments of 1972. This source made it clear to me that the Title IX bill has exceptions and that women are not granted exactly everything that men are entitled to, it depends on the case and situation. Patsy Mink fought to pass a bill that does not give women more rights than men, but instead gives women more rights than initially granted to

This has led us to believe that men's sports deserve more attention and funds. Title IX fixed the funding issue but made it almost impossible to comply to. The problem with the law was its proportionality factor. There had to be an equal number of sports and similar spending on activities for boys and girls. A few sports that are quite expensive are available to both genders but are dominated by men; such as football and wrestling. The cost of these programs was far greater than the cost of many of the other sports and many argued that because the same amount of money wasn't being spent on females sports, it violated Title IX. The rules for this scenario became lenient because it was impossible to fix the amount of spending that is necessary for certain sports to operate. This issue makes it almost impossible to be proportional so only 20% of all high schools and universities are technically in compliance with Title IX requirements (New Developments Concerning Title

Title IX has impacted the society in so many different levels now more women are pursuing a higher education, especially since some

It has protected women by giving an equal chance between each gender. Title IX has helped lessen the comment, "like a girl" and now makes it where girls are looked up to, instead of looked down upon. Instead of looking as the comment negatively, we now encourage it. It's looked as a strong symbol instead of a weakening one.

Two years later, congress enacted the Women’s Educational Equity Act (WEEA), which was designed to set up a network to assist Title IX and to provide grants to help defeat gender bias (Equity Online: WEEA Equity Resource Center, 2002). Basically, this act was the backbone to ensure that Title IX was improving the education system, as intended. The WEEA, in conjunction with Title IX led to enormous changes in public education, and advancements for women in athletics, and academics.