Title IX Title IX

Teachers have to focus mainly on the basic meaning of what the students need to learn instead of teaching the deeper and worldly application of the material being taught. In addition, every year each grade is required to make higher scores on the standardized tests than the year before. There is also the fact that the NCLB program holds children back. Those who are gifted or high performing students are not given the attention that they need, because all of the funding that the schools are given from the program is being used on programs to get all of the students to the minimum skill requirement, which is set by the NCLB. Also NCLB only focuses on math skills, English language skills, and eventually a science skill. This only elevates the scores for two fundamental skills that students need in today’s world. In focusing only on these few skills students lose the benefits of a broader education. Some schools in times of budget cuts have had to cut some of their classes so that they can focus on the subject areas dictated by the NCLB. Plus, some schools have done surveys and found out that high school students are lacking knowledge in the subjects of history, civics, and literature. Another point that people disagree with is the fact that the Act is requiring 100% of students, including disadvantaged and those with special needs, within a school to reach the same state standards in reading and math by

In 1972 Congress passed the Educational Amendments. One section of this law, Title IX, prohibits discrimination against girls and women in federally funded education, including athletic programs. As a result of Title IX, women and girls have benefited from more participation opportunities and more equitable facilities. Women who were under 10 when Title IX passed have much higher sports participation rates than women who grew up before Title IX. Fifty-five percent of the "post-Title IX" generation participated in high school sports, compared to 36% of the "pre-Title IX" generation.35 Because of Title IX, more women have received athletic scholarships and thus the opportunity for higher education than would have

The creation of Title IX in 1972 banned gender discrimination in schools nationwide, particularly in sports (Huffman 4). Without it, superstar female athletes such as Lisa Leslie, Mia Hamm, or the Williams sisters would not be internationally famous. They also would not have the media exposure they get in sports without Title IX. In addition to the few that were just named, media is focusing more and more on female athletes such as Michelle Wie and this year's winter Olympic silver medalist in figure skating, Sasha Cowen. In conjunction with the popularity of female athletes, Title IX has pushed for equality over the past three decades. In Suzanna Huffman's article from "Mass Communication and Society," it states that "Title IX has encouraged school administrators to work toward gender equity in athletic spending, and now many more women participate in college sports and earn college athletic scholarships than in years past" (4). Although this statement is generalized, it is close to the truth in today's culture among men and women. The impact that Title IX has bestowed on women has created a positive outcome. It is astonishing to see what one document in 1972 can do to increase equality for women, yet create so many controversies with it.

     Title IX did much more than what the average mind thinks of when they hear the words: Title IX. I personally was interested in what people thought of when they heard this and did two simple interviews, one of my grandpa’s, a 73 year old man, and also interviewed my friend, Samm, who is a 19 year old female who just recently

If it wasn’t for the passing of the Title IX Legislation, many women wouldn’t have the same opportunities as they have today. Males would usually play in sports, such as football, soccer, baseball etc. Now the participation of females have increased, and women are now given the opportunity to play sports in college. Times have definitely changed now because of the Title IX. If it wasn’t passed in 1972, there would be chaos. Mainly because the love for sports does not only imply toward men, but women too! Both of these quotes demonstrate the amount of women participating in sports and are entering college is highly increasing. Not only did the Title IX increase the opportunities that women had, but it also made women regain their confidence. The evidence that I used within my investigation is valuable because it highlights key point information and provides the reader with insight on the amount of women playing sports today. However, this evidence does have its limitations. The quote does provide the percentage of women that are athletes in college, but it also does not acknowledge the percentage of males, which of course is still dramatically higher than the women’s percentage. However, the quote should acknowledge the amount of men who play sports in college as well. Reason being is practically because men should be acknowledged just as much as

In January of 2011, Delaware University announced that it was discontinuing its men’s wrestling, swimming, tennis, and gymnastics programs (Gottesdiener, 2011). Organizations like this are being diminished and discarded at an ever-increasing rate all across America. College and high school students competing in these athletic events are truly passionate about their chosen sport. In many cases, promising athletes are offered scholarships, initiating a symbiotic relationship between the student and the school they play for. In 1972, a new legislation was put forward with the intent of leveling the school-sponsored playing field. “No person in the United States shall, on the basis of sex, be excluded from participation in, or denied the benefits of, or be subjected to discrimination under any educational program or activity receiving federal funding” (What Is Title IX, 2014). This law is widely accepted as being an invaluable catalyst for the momentous success in female athletics today. Although Title IX has without a doubt been incredibly beneficial to female sports programs, it has not too recently been the source of some heavy speculation. With justifiable evidence, and passionate fervor, male athletes across America are declaring that Title IX is synonymous with injustice. Title IX was necessary in 1972, but it is now outdated and hindering male athletics. Two conflicting arguments, both with substantial claim, leave room for all but one solution. Title IX, although once

Oversight of the implementation of TITLE IX was given to the Department of Education’s Office of Civil Rights (OCR), which is based on protecting the civil rights within federally assisted education programs.

Title IX has given women opportunities for playing any sport they desire. If a man can play a sport, Title IX will declare that a woman may also play it. Without Title IX, many women would not be able to participate in sports that have famous women athletes today. Such sports include, Soccer (which the Women's USA Soccer team dominated during the World Cup, in 2015), Wrestling, Baseball, or even Hockey. A woman can do anything a man can do, and Title IX supports that.

Finally, in 1980, when the Department of Education was established, they were given Title IX to oversee through the Office of Civil Rights. [1] Through all of this, the goal of Title IX has been and is,

As a future women’s basketball coach, it is important to understand the ins and outs of Title IX, and furthermore it is important to understand women’s basketball’s place in the history of Title IX. As a female sporting opportunity, Title IX is at its core supposed to equate these opportunities with those of male sporting opportunities.

While Title IX has been successful, some identify

Title IX came to be in 1972. It was put in place by Congress and became an educational amendment. This law has specific sections, and one section states that girls and women who are in federally- funded education programs also including athletics are not to be discriminated against. It is no secret that females have more of a hardship than men in a lot of areas with sports being one of those top areas. This amendment ensures that girls and women will get the same opportunity and fairness in athletics just like men do. In result, females have even had better facilities as well as the equal opportunities. Things have gotten better for females, but this amendment was not welcomed in the beginning when it was first implemented. People complained that boy’s/men’s sports would suffer a loss because of this, specifically the NCAA and high school administrators. “Title IX passed with little controversy in 1972. Soon after Title IX passed, however, the National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA) and high school administrators complained that boys' sports would suffer if girls' sports had to be funded equally. Regulations about how to implement the law were not released until two years later, and these regulations did not go into effect until July 1975. Even then, the Office of

The main objective of Title IX is to prevent discrimination based on sex in education programs and activities in schools that receive federal funding (U.S. Department, 2015). With few exceptions, it applies to all educational institutions to include elementary and secondary schools, as well as colleges and universities (Overview of Title IX, 2015). It also applies to training or education programs operated by someone receiving federal financial assistance (Overview of Title IX, 2015). Students, employees, and applicants for admission and employment are protected from all forms of discrimination (U.S. Department, 2015). No one can be excluded, regardless of their, sex, sexual orientation, gender identity, full or part-time status, disability,

Looking at the statistics from before Title IX to present day, this law has definitely instilled change. It has opened up a much broader range of opportunities for women in sport that they may have never experienced without this law. These opportunities include more sports available in schools for women to participate in, more scholarships for women to play in college, and more funding for women's teams in schools. In addition to this, a woman's sports team cannot be cut or diminished in size because they are considered the underrepresented class. So, in these areas, Title IX has been widely successful, however it still has a long way to go. Men still have the upper hand in athletics in that they have more opportunities, more scholarships, and more budget dollars. This shows that Title IX has not fully reached its intended purpose and is still working to decrease discrimination for women in sports. However, I believe that not all the factors are taken into account for this. There may be less opportunities for women in sports because there is less interest by them to participate. The majority of women in a school may not even want to participate in a sport and therefore are not being discriminated against in this area. On the other hand, however, it appears that Title IX has caused men to be discriminated against. The law states that its purpose is to prohibit the discrimination on the basis of sex and enforce gender equity, but it has allowed men to be discriminated against in that their sports, funding, and scholarships can be cut in order to accommodate the needs of women’s athletics. Of course it makes sense to do this because men are highly represented, especially compared to women, but that does not mean they should suffer losses because of this. I am not saying I know of a better solution, but I

Horace Mann, a seventeenth-century politician who advocated for widespread public education, once said that education “…is the great equalizer of the conditions of men…” (as cited in Khurana, 2016; Ritchie, 2000). Society is still attempting to improve education, especially between women and men. Andersen (2015) notes how women 's education had been frequently restricted throughout the nineteenth and twentieth centuries. For example, Harvard and Princeton did not admit female students until the late twentieth century (Andersen, 2015). Title IX of 1972 is a significant piece of legislation that was passed to ensure women gain equal opportunity and representation in all aspects and levels of education. If educational institutions choose not to adhere to Title IX policies, they lose their federal funding (Andersen, 2015). Access to education and vocational training, education for pregnant and parenting students, employment in schools, and the atmosphere of the learning environment are all protected areas under Title IX. However, society tends to emphasize the legislation’s view of athletics, sexual harassment, and women’s participation in math, science, and technology (National Women 's Law Center: The MARGARET Fund, 2016).