To What Extent Does Alexander Deserve The Title The Great

I think Alexander the Great was not great because he made bad decisions, was cruel to his men, and he was very greedy. So do you think Alexander the Great was great? Or do you think he doesn't deserve the title “Great”. What truly makes someone “great”? Everyone has their own opinion, but I think he

One reason that Alexander doesn’t deserve to be called great is that, he slaughter thousands of people. In document C, it states that, “Two thousands men of military age were crucified.” The evidence shows that many people were killed while he was growing his empire. Also, the evidence shows that he is mean because many people were killed in the fighting.

A lot of individuals argued if Alexander the Great was great or not great. Alexander the Great was great to his empire and did everything he could to expand his empire. Alexander was born more than 300 years before Jesus was born. He was only 20 when he launched his first invasion of the Persian Empire. The death of Darius was important to Alexander’s conquest to Persia since it would make it easier to rule his people. Alexander’s army was the one that told him to stop and it caused him to march back and it was not even his enemy after eight years of conquest and combat. Alexander the Great was great because he was courageous for his people and intelligent to create ideas to protect his people. Although some may argue that Alexander doesn’t

Who was Alexander the Great? Was he really great? Alexander was he king of the massive empire of Greece. He was the king of Macedonia and was 20 when he got his fathers empire. He expanded his empire from Egypt to India. Sadly died about 10 years after he got the empire. Alexander was great for these reasons, his remarkable achievements, his selflessness, and Tenacious.

Alexander the Great was born in Macedonia in the year 356 BCE. Alexander's father King Philip built the Macedonian army into a "deadly fighting machine". Next Philip planned to attack the huge Persian Empire. Philip was assassinated in 336 BCE and at age of 20 Alexander inherited his father's kingdom and set out with the army to conquer Persian. Alexander leads his troops across Central Asia. Is Alexander the Great living up to his name? I will show you why Alexander deserves his name to be great.

Alexander should not have been called great, because of the many people he killed, and the land he

In conclusion, Alexander was great as a general, not great as a person, and therefore, is a little bit of both. He could keep his troops going in times of trial and hold grudges with the best of them. However, he can't be defined by just one thing. When writing about Alexander the Great, the Basileus of Macedonia, the Hegemon of the Hellenic League, you have to look at all sides of

Because he was an inspiring leader, Alexander the Great deserves to be called “Great”. Evidence is found in Document D, stating, “One of the soldiers swam off towards the band…” The sentence above shows that

Alexander the great is a strong leader for taking over 70 cities. He was born in 356 B.C.E in Macedonia. By the age of 20, he took his father throne. His journey took him 8 years and claimed 70 cities. After all his greatness, he died by a fever in 323 B.C.E. How great was Alexander the Great? Alexander was great because he was a military genius and a inspiring leader.

Alexander has too much integrity making him seem rude. Document D says, “Alexander was himself steering the trireme (a warship with oars), when a strong gust of wind fell on his broad-brimmed Macedonian hat, and the band that encircled it. The hat, being rather heavy, fell into the water. However, the band was carried along by the wind and was caught by one of the reeds growing near the tomb of one of the ancient kings….One of the sailors swam off towards the band and snatched it from the reed. But he did not carry it in his hands because it would get wet while he was swimming. He therefore put it around his own head and brought it to the king. Most of the biographers of Alexander say that the king gave him a talent* as a reward for his zeal. Then he ordered his head to be cut off because the prophets had explained that....he should not allow the head that had worn the royal head band to be safe.” That isn’t the only person Alexander has killed. This proves that Alexander the Great was not actually great because killing people for silly reasons is not a good

I think Alexander deserves the title of Alexander the Great. He was 20 years old when he launched his invasion into the Persian Empire. The evidence I will use are these documents. The legend of the helmet, document D. The battle of Porus, document B. Alexander's empire compared to the Roman Empire, document A, E. I think Alexander was great, because of the size his empire and how little time it took him to make.

Alexander was great because he leaded his men into a fighting zone but he prepared it to attack his enemy. It is true that Alexander had some bad points. For example “they scooped up with difficulty what they could and hurried back to Alexander then, just before they reached him, they tipped the water into a helmet and gave it to him. Alexander, with a word of thanks for the gift, took the helmet and , in full view of his troops, poured the water on the ground.” (Doc D).

Do you ever wonder if Alexander the great was great? Alexander was great because he’s a military genius and an inspiring leader, and he speared culture. Alexander the great wasn’t always great. He did stuff in little time too.

    In 356 BCE, Alexander the III of Macedon; a hero destined to conquer multiple empires and rule numerous lands was born. These deeds gave him the nickname Alexander the Great. But does he deserve this name? He certainly made a dent in history if you know what he did. He definitely deserves to be called Great. Did he not do all the things that everyone is saying he did? If not than how is Persia gone in the dust. Alexander the Great has his reasons to be great. He also has his reasons not too. He murdered so many innocent people. Today he would be more like Hitler. I’m sure that everybody he killed would call him evil, not great. He destroyed many towns and cities.  Alexander affected

Alexander was not known as Alexander the Great for no reason, he earned that title. Alexander the Great conquered many lands and he participated in many battles including the Battle of Granicus, Charonea, Issus and Thebes. Those battles were not minor nor were they major but they were definitely big enough to cause hundreds and hundreds of fatalities. Alexander couldn’t have accomplished all that he did without the help of others and all of the moments in his life that made him stronger and more independent.