To What Extent Should Freedom Be Restricted

With health risks on the rise, and people getting careless, a change needs to take place. Our society is built upon freedom, but in some cases that freedom needs to be restricted. A simple choice throughout someone's day can affect the health of everyone around them. Even though freedom is one of the most important things in life, the public health has a wide outcome that could affect the rest of the world. Public health should be put before freedom because it affects more than one person, determines the generations to come, and this is what laws are based upon..

Government also has the justifiable right to impose certain reasonable restriction on individuals for the general benefit of society and because certain types of personal risks can have significant costs to society. For example, the government can require car manufacturers to install seatbelts and require drivers to wear them because vehicular

First, even though some people view freedom as the essence of life because of its self-rule nature and controversial history, public health is more important. That is, people worship the idea of having their own freedoms, but more often than not they are putting themselves and others in danger which makes public health more important. For example, public health improves the society's well-being by keeping everyone safe and healthy. The rules by the government are created to keep the citizens and environment well protected. Likewise, if there wasn’t public health people would abuse their power of freedom and harm themselves, because people would be doing things

There is a freedom of choosing what to do, and how government involvement in personal decisions such as this could lead to potentially having the government deem how many

The right of individual freedoms and the collective good for society as a whole, is an ethical dilemma that is debated time and time again. Many will agree that each individual has control over their own body and what is done to it or what goes into it. However, when it comes to the question of what is better for society, those same individuals will agree that individual rights are superseded by public good. (Leonard, 2009).

Such as a ban ultimately puts the american values of freedom and individualism in jeopardy. Glass`s point is that if the government controls what we eat and drink then it is going to cause us very big trouble. However as the article of “food politics” states “poor health is much more than an individual's personal problems. If you are ill, your illness has consequences for others. This means

In a democratic society, it is generally considered the Government's role to promote morality and justice within its citizens and seek to restrict supposedly immoral and unjust acts. Thus if an act is to be considered immoral, it seems obvious to suggest that the government is justified in restricting it regardless of whether it is harmful to others. However, since everybody has a different understanding of morality and freedom, no Government could legitimately restrict an act on the basis of it being 'immoral'. Thus it seems more plausible to suggest that the Government should only restrict actions which everybody can agree should be restricted. However it's not clear where the line should be drawn or how a consensus on the issue could be

There are moments when civil liberties should be curtailed in democratic countries like the US and Canada, in order to maintain national security. While this is true, there are also moments that an individual’s civil liberty should be maintained whereas it is not. Consequently, governments should make clear boundaries as to which occasions civil liberties should be restricted. For instance, both the Patriotic Act and the Anti-terrorist Act allowed rover wiretapping which are needed to deal with terrorists who have a sophisticated knowledge of how technology works.

progression of a society. People should be given the freedom to make their own choices and follow them through without any reluctance or fear that they will be penalized. Of course, the freedom of thought and expression also comes with a condition, which is, that those thoughts and expressions should not become a nuisance for others. In other words, those thoughts and expressions should not have adverse affect for others.

The world is really messed up in today's generation. Many of the population around the world especially the United States Of America is forcing each individual to go by a certain government or leader. In the United States they have most individuals to be free and as independent they want to be but the one thing that the United states need to do is watch how many individuals use their free independent rights by doing ignorant things. The individuals that have independent rights do not know how to use their rights properly. They think their rights do not mean anything to other citizens and the authorities.

How do you feel about our freedoms as Americans? I believe that our freedom is constantly being taken away little at a time. I feel this way because in the U.S. today so many actions occur that just keep wearing away at our freedoms.

Freedom is something that everybody wants, it has been fought for by many countries for many years. When I think about freedom I think of all the things that we have the ability to do that other countries or other societies don’t have. From wing able to voice our opinion to being able to go see a movie like dead pool or other movies like that, which, in many countries seeing it wouldn't even be an option. Freedom is in everything, we live and breathe freedom.

In today’s society more and more people believe that there are all these regulations on their rights, however this is not the case. The decreasing number of people who still believe that there are rules and restrictions on certain

Nothing in society is greater than your God-given right to freedom. The right to freedom is also a privilege. Outside of the US in some of the more desolate areas men, women, and kids are fighting for their lives from guns, diseases and contaminated water, where the only big argument is where and when you can drive a vehicle with air emission or telling someone they should not be smoking for it damages another's health. The legal right for a person to do anything should not affect a community as a whole.

The control that the government has on the citizens of this country has pushed its boundaries and should not be able to dictate out choices. This opinion article 'Limiting our freedoms' published on the citizensforcivilliberties.com written by Oliver Clements talks of not the benefits or negatives of the new reform but of the limitations put on the citizens of Australia, the roles that the government has taken to control us while making us believe that it is for our own benefit. It talks of the restraints that citizens are put under because of the select few that cannot control themselves. Clements does not agree with the new reform but not because he will lose money or that he wants to be able to bet more but because the liberations of the