This was a presentation done by professor Bateza focusing on Tokenism. Tokenism is the practice or policy of admitting a small number of members of different races to give the impression they’re genuinely putting in effort. You then proceed to show a few funny images that depict people of color photoshopped in a picture or a staged photo with all white people and one person of color. Next, you listed a few people who have studied a vast amount in tokenism studies and taken action. My favorite part was when you brought up Kanter’s three groups theory. Performance pressure, is often thought as to be always under the microscope. Next, Social isolation is where a few people are mixed with a vast majority of white people. Last, role entrapment is …show more content…
Both of these statements stunned me and made me question the systematic world of business. Another important note I had was the Malcolm X quote which stated, “Tokenism only benefits the few, not the masses. Distancing oneself from the community they exclude” (Malcolm X). Another important part was tokenism and diversity efforts. These are the four I picked up on. First, racists are the problem and we tend to make them out to have a particular face. Second, diversity as a debt. Third, Racism as paranoia. Fourth, minorities have an advantage. Seeing these things from time to time in my every day. I think the four are great because they are noticeable to people, affect themselves, and have well researched theories. You are my teacher and you were the speaker, so there were many similarities. One part in particular was when you mentioned the MTV video of colored people and saying microaggressions towards white people to show them what they’re experiencing. The clip was funny and it did prove some valuable points. Your mentioning of it fit in nicely with the conversation. Something I found intriguing were the students responses to if they feel tokened at St. Olaf. In their responses, many felt tokened. I had not put that much thought on if Tokenism exists at St. Olaf so I had never thought about it from that
The Salvation Army Laredo Texas Corps, is a place of humble means that has been ravished by the impact of poverty. However, in the midst such disparity, there lives and exist soldiers that are sold out for Christ and The Salvation Army. Recently, the soldiers passions have been reinvigorated to love, serve, and make Salvation their number one priority. The main focus of the corps has been to enhance and develop programs, in order to, allow soldiers passions to flourish; by expanding the Kingdom and the work of The Salvation Army here in Laredo.
Author Shankar Vedantam in his science article “How a Self-Fulfilling Stereotype Can Drag Down Performance” implies that if a person is subjected to stereotypes it can affect your performance. The author develops this idea by first introducing his theme with a question, then he tells of experiments others have made to support this idea, and finally he wraps it up by telling us that companies and schools are victim to stereotypes and needs to stop. The author’s purpose is to explain to us how stereotypes can affect our lives in order to call out to people so we can lower the rates of stereotyping. The author establishes a educated tone for people who are interested in research and global
Former President George W. Bush gave a speech entitled "Ending Racial Inequality" in 2000. This speech is civil and effective because of his smooth transitions from one concept to another. This helps his speech to flow logically, and it's easy for his audience to follow. George Bush also has ethos because he is the Presient of the United States. His ethos gives the audience reason to listen to his solutions to racial inequality. Saying things such as "I believe in these standards" and listing statistics; "90 percent of the cost of basic health care...," brings logic to his speech, making it more effective. He alluded to Abraham Lincoln, who is, of course, a strong figure in racial equality and stirs up the desired emotions as well as his references
His experience in the classroom and his substantial research into both the positives and negatives of diversity make his clear, concise arguments are incredibly convincing, especially in regards to his own university classroom.
In this week’s lecture the theme of choice was “Minority Experiences”. By far, this is my favorite theme because the readings not only looked at race but other things like disability. Also rather than initially focusing on blacks and whites as a race other races were looked at as well. In “Being a Chink” the Asian side of race was demonstrated and in “Disability” handicapped individuals where looked at as a minority. “I Have a Dream” by Martin Luther King Jr. was a demonstration of one man trying to unite minorities on one front. In his speech Dr. King uses rhetorical devices to appeal to a crowd at large in Washington, DC. Prior to his speech he establishes his ethos in a way because of his life as a pastor. He also engaged in much peaceful
A speaker earns the right for his or her voice to be heard through the power of ethos, logos, and pathos. In the TED Talk “Color blind or color brave?” Mellody Hobson speaks about her experiences, states facts, and connects with the audience. Throughout her presentation, Hobson mainly addresses the events she has gone through as a woman of color. She informs the crowd about the difference of the terms color blind and color brave. She’s very open about the topic of race and believes it should be talked about, even if it is uncomfortable. Not speaking about race ignores continues issues that still happen today and can even create more problems. Mellody has the right to speak about the topic and capture the audience's attention because she gives her life experiences and factual information all while doing it in a non conflicting manner. Her open mindedness and passion are shown as she speaks.
I came into this class not so naïve as some students may have been. I’ve grown up going to public schools, living in a diverse small town, and having interracial relationships in my family. Although I was informed on some forms of racism and the fact that racism does in fact still exist, I didn’t realize it was extensive as it really is. All the readings, videos, and lectures have directly related back to the purpose of the course. As a whole, I feel like this class has grown in knowledge not only about how racism affects people, but how to change and make a difference. This class has informed me a lot more about the unfortunately thriving acts of racism in the United States.
My thoughts after listening to The American Life podcast was, as bad as it sounds I didn’t even really know that there were still all black and all white schools. I didn’t know that kids were still separated in that way. I think it’s sad that still after so many years people can’t all come together as one, they have to separate themselves based on skin color. Which is just wrong. The part where they talked about students that we behind. They were correct. If you’re someone who is already way behind where you should be and you are then given bad resources and unskilled teachers you are either going to stay where you are, or get worse. If you are on a classroom with a bunch of kids who are advanced, you are more likely to catch up. The kids that
Throughout the semester we had the choice of presentations to watch- each one focusing on something different, but equally important in today’s world. Joseph Pearce spoke of his past as a White Supremacist and how
An intelligent Black boy, who dumbs himself down to avoid criticism. The Hispanic girl who stays at home to take care of her family, instead of going to school. The Asian who pursues a career in medicine, despite wanting to be an actor. All of these strange actions can be explained by the Critical Race Theory. In short, the Critical Race Theory examines how victims of racism and stereotypes counter prejudice. Under the Critical Race Theory falls stereotype threat in which victims assume the roles that they think are prescribed for them based on popular stereotypes. The aim of stereotype threat and the Critical Race Theory is to explain both negative and positive ways minorities are effected by their race and how this reflected in our society as a whole.
We will critically analyze speeches by Brent Staples, Coffey Anderson, and Steve Lock particularly at their views of the perception of black males and their personal experience on handling the stigmas associated with them.
All four pieces were enlightening, but there was one particular piece that really opened my eyes about race and the different reasons that individuals may or may not use the concept to help define who they are. The article by Johnston, Pizzolato and Kanny examined the ways by which individuals may or may not utilize the concept of race to form their sense of identity. It may be self-centered, but I had never really thought that other people might have a different way of thinking of race as part of their identity. I had just assumed that everyone understood race as I understood it; and so that everyone else’s race also was ingrained and played a part of their identity in the way that I believed race played a role in my sense of self. However, as I read the piece and the authors explained the ways by which the participants identified race s playing a role in their identity I was surprised. I
During my time enrolled in Psy 3325: Stereotypes, Prejudice Discrimination, taught by Dr. Tay Hack, we explored several topics concerning social differences. Using the textbook ‘ Understanding the Psychology of Diversity’ second Edition, I gained a deeper understanding of how the mind groups individuals together both consciously and unconsciously thus influencing the way we treat a person. In this course we covered racism, classism, homosexism, weightism, ageism, and the stigmas that come with these titles.
First and foremost, I'm deeply disturbed by what transpired at the National Policy Institute conference over the weekend. It's rather apropos that we are covering the topic of race at this moment. I'm furious but inspired (now, more than ever) to continue on this journey of justice studies as part of my personal commitment to be an ally for minorities. I wish that every person had the privilege of taking this class, the knowledge we're gaining is one of the most powerful tools we can use to combat the ignorance of white nationalism.
This section will be outlining the weaknesses of affirmative action or the arguments against it. Affirmative Action is supposed to be a program designed to end racism, but isn't it really justifying racism by its own actions. Its policies judge people solely on skin color and gender. That is discrimination in itself. Is discrimination the solution to resolving past discrimination? No, it's not. No program can be considered good when it hurts others. Affirmative Action tried to help minorities and women, but in the process, reverse discrimination has taken place. Now, white males are discriminated against. This can not be an affirmative program if there is a form of discrimination involved. Instead of choosing a candidate for a job or for school admission, because of one's color or gender, it should be because of their talents and abilities. The best any colored male or female should be selected for the job, or to get accepted into school. Why should some people get special preferences over