preview

Toni Morrison Perspective

Decent Essays
Open Document

In Toni Morrison’s novel, she expresses the lives of different races during the introduction of slavery in the New World in the late 17th century. When looking into this novel as I read it, I had looked into how each character was portrayed within the text. While Morrison could have told her fiction through the eyes of a single protagonist in the first person, she utilizes various protagonists through the omnipresent third person perspective, and switches between the two among chapters. Florens, Sorrow, and Lina are characters with different backgrounds and views, and based on an interview about how she wrote her novel, Morrison explained that she wanted to “separate race from slavery.” (Norris) When I looked into what she had said, I pondered …show more content…

Within the first pages of the novel, the readers are introduced to Jacob Vaarks, a free man who comes to the New World as a trader to start a new life. What some people may infer within the second chapter’s setting is that the land was described to have “shorelines beautiful enough to bring tears, wild food for the taking.” (A Mercy 13) Morrison establishes the land Vaark stepped on to be a place of new beginnings and a promising start for those traveling from Europe to look for a better life. However, while the first few pages of the second chapter may portray Vaark as a well-intentioned individual, as “he was determined to prove that his own industry could amass the fortune…without trading his conscious for coin” (A Mercy 32), Susan Strehle points out that he falls into a category of exceptionalism, by using justifications such as “he congratulates himself on his mercy to vulnerable young women like Florens and Sorrow, but he never considers paying them for their labor.” (Strehle) As a free individual who can read and write, one might infer that his ability to own slaves comes from his literacy, since it allows him to conduct trade with slave owners like Senhor D’Ortega. In some way, Vaark’s change from seeing owning slaves as immoral to owning a farm worked on by slaves and building a mansion is a tie to old European culture, in that he believed that “what a man leaves behind is what a man is.” (A Mercy 104) Despite utilizing slaves to build his

Get Access