Toronto's Public Transit System Analysis

The latest idea of building the 23 kilometer Light Rail Transit System which planned to run from Port Credit to the Brampton Go Station has created a huge division between some of the residents of Brampton’s downtown core and the City of Brampton’s Council Committee.

The street pattern of this census is aerial pattern, because the alignment of present public transit is based on streetcar pattern. 30.5% of employees travel in public transits (eg. Buses, sky strain) and more than 35% employees walk or bike to work place. However, congestion may cause by the segregation and concentration of homogenous land use. Parking along the street in Downtown Vancouver is expensive and streets congestions occur during peak hours. Thus, travelling with public transit to work place is less time consuming and allow longer travel distance. Because people can easily get to a sky station with maximum 20 minutes walk, it usually operates every 3

Commuting in Toronto includes TTC, cars and bicycles; however, in recent years a new alternative for transportation known as the Kick Scooter has become a very favorable choice when people think of an efficient way to move around the city. Currently, for most Torontians, the TTC and bikes are the fastest and most efficient ways to commute in Toronto and according to a 2014 ranking, the TTC was considered one the most successful systems of transportation compared with other cities (Flack, 2014). In addition, bikes are mostly considered “healthy, convenient, cost-effective, and fun” (Start Cycling) but although the TTC and bicycles provide a good service, many people over time have obtained better results from alternative transportation, especially

Metro Vancouver is home to a diverse culture that is continuously increasing as more immigrants migrate to Metro Vancouver and call it home. As the population increases, more traffic congestions are occurring throughout Metro Vancouver. Due to this, Metro Vancouver claims through an increase to transit services and enhancement of roads, the traffic congestions will decrease. In addition, Metro Vancouver has proposed that the costs of the construction be paid through an additional 0.5 percent charge to the standard 7 percent Provincial Sales Tax. The Metro Vancouver transit referendum should be voted against since current taxes fund city transportation, construction will cause further traffic congestion, and Translink is not prioritizing funds efficiently.

Large cities and populations rely on public transportation to reduce traffic congestion and vehicle emission as well as provide a means for citizens without personal vehicles to travel to important places like work, school or the grocery store. Critically important infrastructure to any city, without a reliable regional transportation system those who cannot afford cars are greatly impacted. Such groups may be confined to a particular neighborhood which may result in lack of accessibility to jobs or other important resources, in modern cities neighborhoods cut off from transportation can become increasingly poor, see elevated crime rates and more likely to continue to be separated from the local economy. Beginning operation in 1973 Sacramento’s public transportation system grew with the population of the region, in the past two decades the system has extended even further to incorporate outside cities. The system

George and University of Toronto Mississauga (UTM) campuses. This service is absolutely free for the UTM students because their fee is included in their student fees. The TTC is also known as one of the largest transit systems in North America. The buses in Toronto are the least expensive and are pretty flexible; you can legitimately put a bus on every street. Considering that the buses let out bad gas fumes and are very noisy, they’re examined as environmentally friendly still because they can fit more people in the buses other than using more cars. Taking busses in Toronto is rather better than driving a car. It saves you less time which you don’t get stuck in traffic on the way to school because it is on the main roads and highways. For the subway it is much faster then taking any busses or cars. They move at about 32 km/h, that is about twice the speed of the LRT, and is also protected from the

The transportation situation in Mississauga is extremely unsustainable for the future of the city. First of all, cars are incredibly costly to maintain in many ways. For example, automobile owners would have to pay for things such as energy to run the car and maintenance to keep the car in good condition. Consequently, a large amount of resources are wasted on cars that could be used for more efficient transportation methods, such as trains. If Mississauga were to continue using cars at this rate, many of our resources would be used up. Moreover, emissions that cars release are detrimental for the environment. The side effects of emissions released from cars include acid rain, reduced air quality, and the increased intensity of global warming.

The London program has cut congestion from the original cordon by 20 to 30 percent (70,000 fewer cars per day), and by 14 percent in the western extension (30,000 fewer cars per day). There has been a 6 percent increase in bus ridership and a 12 percent increase in cycling journeys into the western addition during charging hours; and a 66 percent increase in cycling within the charging zone since it was introduced (Transport for London, 2009). As private vehicle traffic has dropped, some road space has been dedicated to transit and other purposes. Transport for London (TfL) announced that construction‐ related delays and changing use of road space contributed to increasing traffic congestion in the charging zone back to pre‐charging zone levels, but that the number of vehicles was still significantly lower and that construction‐related delays would have been worse without the congestion charging zone in place (Mail On‐Line, 2008). Many of these delays appear to be temporary, although some alterations to roadways to promote alternative forms of transportation are permanent.

The Canadian Institute of Planners is working with the Canadian Urban Transit Association (CUTA) and the Transportation Association of Canada (TAC) to improve the transportation system in Canada and try to promote active lifestyles and healthier communities. In this section, cities in the four provinces

What can be done to improve a city that has already been developed? This was the question posed to the City of Hamilton in regards how Hamilton, a city that has been forgotten, could be revitalised. The best way to revitalise an area is to make it more accessible. The Light Rail Transit or LRT is key to ensuring Hamilton gets the improvement it needs to have the ability to be a major economic contributor in the future. What the City has proposed is the best way to improve the newly revitalised Hamilton. With a LRT along King connecting Mcmaster to Eastgate, the East and West of Hamilton will be connected in a more efficient way than ever before. Furthermore, with the LRT running along James street the waterfront will be connected to

With all major cities in the world, such as: New York City, Tokyo and Paris, comes a exceptional transit system. Whether its is subways, buses, light rail transit (LRT) or a combination of the above, they all perform a crucial role in transporting people from one destination to the next. Since opening in 1954, Toronto’s Transit Commission, also known as the TTC, has a system that just about cover every part of Toronto, with 4 subway/rapid transit lines, 143 bus and 11 streetcar routes in 2015, (TTC, 2015). Unfortunately, the TTC is still plagued with many problems, such as: unexplained delay and overcrowding, which decline the riderships and revenues (Curry, 2016; Hume, 2016). Furthermore the population of the greater toronto area (GTA) is expected to grow in the upcoming years, Toronto’s transit system would not be ready for the increase in capacity (CrosstownTO, 2014). Therefore in order to increase the transit system’s capacity and make it more appealing, more LRT/Bus lines would need to be built in the GTA due to their constructability, benefits to society and the environment, flexibility in suburbs and their low risks in meeting ridership goal.

Public transportation is the backbone of many large cities in the country but it seems the system of transit in cities on the east coast and the west coast are far more efficient and well organized than in the mid-west. For example in Columbus, Ohio there has been deterioration in the public transit system. The area which COTA covers is the greater Columbus metropolitan area which includes the whole of Franklin County and parts of Union, Delaware, Fairfield and Licking Counties. Its main role is to provide public transit service for the local population and take them from one place to another safely. But it seems COTA does not involve women passengers in their discussions for consensus building on new routes and redevelopment of the routes.

There are three key benefits in prioritising public transport in urban environments. The first is that by reducing congestion, commercial transport becomes

To help with the vast amount of commuters, a train system stretching from downtown Nashville to Lebanon was introduced in September 2006. The Tennessean Newspaper reported in 2016 that an estimated amount of 1,100 daily riders commute on the Music City Star (Humbles). If everyone who is a commuter on the train used to drive, that is 1,100 less cars cramming into rush hour traffic and less pollution being generated. How would a futuristic transit system benefit the city of downtown Nashville? The new hybrid-electric buses would reduce the amount of gas the government has to buy and light rails would reduce the congestion on roads. It would also bring more jobs with the construction. This transit proposal would introduce many employment opportunities, for example, construction workers building the sidewalks or more bus drivers.

Recently the City of Wichita has begun to experience problems providing and maintaining its transportation services. The City of Wichita has traditionally operated a standard transit system common in many other cities. This transit system included large busses on fixed routes and smaller busses for more specialized transportation needs. This system however, does not cover the entire scope of public transportation needs required by many citizens. Citizens have voiced a need for change in the city’s transit system. In this memo I will propose two alternatives, a public/private partnership and a reciprocal community transport system, that aim to improve the Wichita transit system.