Torture And Suffering Research Paper

Many people who think that the way that we treat animals in the process of raising those for human consumption are wrong never stop, to think what they can do to stop this problem from further occurring. Furthermore, they make impassioned calls for more “humanely” raised meat. Instead to soothe their consciences they shop for “free range” meat, and eggs; which has no importance. Even if an animal is raised ‘free range” it still lives s life of pain and suffering that all ends with a butcher’s knife. Although many know that over 53 billion land animals are slaughtered each year for human utilization they still tend to eat this meat with no problem. The simple explanation is that many don’t care what happens to animals as long as they are eating and healthy. If they did care then they would what could be a difficult choice; to go without eating meat and selling it in any form.

Eating animals poses two moral questions. Is it wrong to raise and kill animals simply because humans enjoy the fleeting taste of their flesh? Do our differences from these animals justify their slaughter? The response to both of these questions is simple. Never. Many people believe that their superiority over animals is a justification to eat them. Animals have been traditionally defined as slaves and non-rational beings without moral reasoning, but these beliefs have been refuted for centuries.Even if these claims were true, these differences should encourage more, not less, moral consideration since they gather that animals cannot give or withhold their consent or

Throughout time humans have forged sympathy for numerous animals, created from the relationships we have developed over time, bonding and interacting with them. We have a grimace look with an animal that's been physically abused or a farm animal being butchered for the meat that eventually make its to the grocery shelf. Having watched videos on supermarket suppliers we don't realize the apathy of some various meat, dairy and egg industries that settle their animals in heinous conditions and have utter negligence for their sentience. It becomes certain that these wondrous animals who provide us with an ecological resource are not respected and action is necessary to punish those individuals. As a society we sometimes disregard the death of some animals, it's unfair but we are just biased on the affection we show to certain animals.

he act of torture throughout history . The devices that was used in slow, painful, and

The question of torture has certainly been a major topic, especially, since the horrendous attacks that America sustained on 911 and I can certainly understand the passion that people have about this debate. Fighting such an evil enemy, as Islamic terrorism, has had a huge impact on the way in which we as a society approach the ethics surrounding this subject. In my view, this discussion very much involves the principles and ones motives behind the tactics that maybe used to justify torture.

the 14th to 18th centuries in Europe, torture was a very common thing of the

The parts in well known movies where the victim is tied to a wall and another causes unnecessary harm to him is classified as torture. In the movie, Saw ll, Jigsaw places a group of people that he believes have done something wrong in a house. Their goal is to work together to escape with clues that Jigsaw gives them. Many torture devices are placed around the house such as a pool of used needles and a furnace. The way to survive the house is to go through torture to get injections needed to stay alive. Torture is pain or physical harm inflicted onto a person by something or someone else. There are many forms of torture and these punishments are usually inflicted for a reason. Like any issue, there are many arguments against torture based on the opinion that it is inhumane. Additionally, laws have been placed into effect to prevent future torture from occurring.

For years, Americans have used torture as a way of punishing those who have committed heinous crimes against others, specifically prisoners of war. Recently, controversy has risen over the debate as to whether or not it is inhumane and unconstitutional to use torture as a type of punishment. Throughout Bush’s time in office, it was made clear that him and his administration believed that interrogation was the easiest way to unveil the truth of a situation from a prisoner of war. In contrast, President Obama believes that the use of drones to kill these prisoners is the more beneficial approach, considering what they do does not constitute them to live another day on this earth. In reality, that is not the most feasible approach for anyone, as our government is left without obtaining the information they need from that person, putting our country in great danger (Monroe). In working to support President Bush’s idea that torture is essential

Should torture be used by police and the United States military? Some say yes, law enforcement should use all means available to apprehend terrorists and other dangerous criminals. They believe public safety and national security trump individual safety, and that some people are not worthy of humane treatment. The increasing amount of mass shootings and terrorist attacks happening in our country prove torture tactics should be used. People who commit serious acts of violence should be subject to serious methods and our military should be able to execute without hesitation.

Talking about the renaissance in class these past couple of weeks has made me remember some of the genealogy that my mom has done on my family. And she was able to trace it all the way back to man sitting in the jail cell with the infamous King Arthur. So I decided to write the essay on the situations of the prisons and torture methods of the renaissance.

The feeling that one is not in control has been demonstrated to be one of the prime stressors of torture, ultimately a cause for its severely traumatizing effects. Harvard psychiatrist Stuart Grassian, has exposed that when prisoners are put into a solitary confinement studies show that they “tend to become irritable, hyper vigilant, jumpy, fearful, and chronically tense” (humanrights.ucdavis.edu). On the other hand, Metin Basaoglu discovered that deceptively banal mistreatments that may not cause long-term psychological problems when used individually may instead, lead to mental disorders when grouped together. The experience of being enclosed in, humiliated or harshly threatened leaves one feeling powerless in front of the victimizers. Post- torture symptoms range from the prevalent chronic pain, which is often connected to several body systems.

Eating animals is part of the daily life of billions of people all over the world. Every day, thousands of animals are killed for the production of food for people. We have been brought up eating meat and never questioned it. It is culturally accepted even though modern livestock and poultry production (factory farming) is cruel and gives animals no other purpose for existence except for human consumption. There are particular religions which prohibit eating certain meats or eating meat at all. The religious points of view also cover the topic on the treatment of animals. Cultural practices on eating animals around the world differ from each other and what some may consider the norm may be shocking

Margaret Atwood is a poet, critic, novelist, and activist. Atwood stands for issues that trouble her, and sees that there are obstacles within her community. Through her entire writing career people can see that science, feminism, and the environment is reflected in her work. She lived her childhood in fairness and equality, and was raised to be independent, but the environment she grew up in was one of unfairness and inequality. Many might say Atwood’s parents raising her to be an independent individual and becoming an active individual in Amnesty International for several years were significant influences throughout her life that categorized her as a feminist.

Animals, like humans, experience both pleasure and pain. To deny this would be like denying they breath the same air that we do. Yet every day animals are being murdered inhumanly and violently at slaughterhouses throughout the country. Factory Farming has become the dominant method of raising meat in America. It is not only cruel and inhumane, but it is also environmentally destructive, and has been linked to spreading illness and disease. We are all moral managers in our own right, therefore have a moral obligation to do something to reduce the impact do make not for today, but for the tomorrows that come. However, we do not; in fact, we continue this vicious cycle of pain and suffering. We drive a certain pleasure from eating this meat. How can we justify these actions? Do animals not have a right to freedom? Do they not deserve equal consideration? Animals have the right to behave naturally during their limited lifetime, yet we deny them the simplest form of life and freedom. By defining their freedom we are denying it; freedom defined is freedom defined.

All over the world, people sit down to a meal that include of steak, pork chops or chicken. It is not too often these days that the consumer considers the life of the animal in which they are eating. It is also not common to even associate the slab of beef on one’s plate with an actual living, breathing, feeling cow. When one hears cow, images of luscious green fields with spotted cows mooing and grazing peacefully fill your mind; and this is how many of our society think cattle are raised for consumption. Instead, cattle are “raised” in what can be described as holding pens, over crowded stalls with no room to move. Often times, these cows don’t even make it past their first few days of life before being brutally slaughtered. In his article, On Eating Animals, Namit Arora suggests that Americans have something wrong with our way of thinking when it comes to animals. We treat our domesticated pets with love and care as we would a family member; but turn a blind eye to the tortured animals we eat every day. Where do we draw the line on what is okay to do to one living creature and what is considered archaic to do to another? While eating meat is not a crime, or even a bad thing, considering God gave humanity the animals to eat after the floods (Genesis 9, The Bible); is the treatment of said animals something we should consider before we fire up that grill?