Pain, disadvantage, distress--suffering is a part of the daily life of people from all over. Throughout the film, Touching the Void, Simon experienced many psychological challenges that scarred him for life. Personal injury can involve more than just physical harm. Compared to Joe, who suffered physically, Simon had psychologically suffered more than the physical punishment that Joe had endured. Simon was faced with tough decisions that were life or death situations. When Simon cut the rope and separated himself, this symbolizes the burden that Simon had with Joe. One example of this would be when Simon had stated that he had no intention on trying to save Joe after he had cut the rope. This evidence shows that Simon did not want to be responsible for Joe and his survival; therefore, Simon decided to let go of that burden. In addition, Simon chose to leave Joe and not try to save him. An example of this would be when Simon had looked over the cliff, he didn’t take the time to look or save Joe, Simon should have taken more time, should have saved his friend, should have not left him stranded, or he wouldn’t be in so much psychological pain. This …show more content…
Holding onto a memory of a loved one can only create problems for the one dealing with the loss. An example of how Simon had to deal with the loss of Joe is that Simon had to burn all of Joe's clothes. This evidence shows that Simon was having a hard time dealing with the cost of what happened to Joe. Simons way of dealing with this pain was to get rid of anything that was Joe's. Additionally, seeing objects or memories of a loved one can cause emotional pain. An example of this would be the fact that Simon had the intention of leaving the base camp early. This evidence shows that Simon was willing to leave behind every connection he had with Joe. All in all, there were multiple ways that Simon tried to erase the memory of what happened to
Simon is the one boy who never participates in destructive behaviors and always contributes to the well being of the boys. He continues to work even after everyone stops, gives Piggy food when no one else will, and speaks his mind about the beast. He is also the only one to realize that the true beast is inside the boys. Simon’s moral compass, much like the superego, allows him to see the evil of mankind. Simon is whole-heartedly good. The superego attempts to lead a person to the morally right pathway, much like Simon aims to show Ralph how he can do what’s best for the tribe. The primitive nature of the others overpowers Simon’s internal good nature. Even after his death, Simon’s moral nature lives on through the boys similar to how the superego can continue to shine after a person follows the desires of the id.
In this passage from Jon Krauaker's Into Thin Air, Jon Krauaker does not display the sense of accomplishment that one would expect from achieving such a difficult endeavor. He really displays a sense of grief and dissatisfaction from what he had accomplished. For taking a risk as life threatening as this, in Krauaker's eyes, he couldn't possibly be proud of what he had done when so many men had lost their lives during the same excursion that he journeyed on. Throughout this novel, Jon Krauaker uses immense amounts of rhetorical devices to display his emotion to convey his attitude toward the dangers of climbing Mt. Everest.
Simon attempts to comfort Ralph by ensuring him that he will eventually return back to home. Apparently, he cannot guarantee such a thing or give a precise date to Ralph, but, as one of the most matured boys on the island, and based on his intelligent to read the signs around him, realizes that Ralph is losing his hope and soon will end up like Jack. Thus, tries to encourage and motivate him, to look forward to the day of rescue. Also, in the novel, Simon, is considering a religious figure, more like an angel, who can predict the future. He is always there for Ralph, supporting him and providing the necessary information he needs in order to keep going with the life on the island.
On May 10, 1996, nine people perished on Mt. Everest. Jon Krakauer, a writer from Outside magazine, was there to witness the events and soon after write the book, Into Thin Air, chronicling the disaster. Jon Krakauer is not only the writer and narrator of Into Thin Air but is also one of the main characters. Originally Outside Magazine planned to send Krakauer to Everest in order for him to write a story for the magazine. The climb was completely financed by the magazine with one of the leading Everest guide groups led by Rob Hall, an elite climber. Krakauer divides the people on the mountain into two main categories, tourist and elite. The elite being guides and Sherpas like Hall, Harris and Ang Dorje,
Throughout the story, Simon gave a variety of advice that did not seem important at the moment, but turned out to be substantial as time went by. Simon
Ironically, the dead man was a soldier, a symbol of the savagery that was the true Beast. However, Simon's compassion showed again as he braved the stench to cut the parachute from the corpse; he laid the Beast to rest. With this act of his pensive and generous nature, he proved what a good leader he could have been.
Chapter 7 Joe lands on a ledge in a crevasse. He lies on the edge of the ledge expecting Simon to fall and pull him of into the crevasse. Simon never falls down so he pulls down the rope and realises that it has been cut.
Simon shows his individuality and cravings for tranquility and cognizance also through his participation with others. One instance when he truly displays this is when he was picking fruit from the “littluns”. The “littluns” and “lugged them towards the trees” and “Simon found for them the fruit they could not reach” (Golding,56). He feeds them alone and “when he had satisfied them”he “turned away from them and went where the just perceptible path led him” (Golding,56). This shows how through his clarity with nature and himself, he helps others and continues to portray that he prefers to think, act, and help others by himself. He also shows his individualism when he reacted to the death of the pig. With the chaos going around him, Simon isolates himself and “lowered his head, carefully keeping his eyes shut, then sheltered them with his hands” next to the pile of guts Jack and Roger left after penetrating the pig’s head with a stick (Golding,138). He ignores everything around him and tries his best to hide away from the monstrous actions the other boys are committing. This also supports the idea that he favors time alone in his own thoughts in peace rather than facing his fear. In
This shows that Simon has thought about it and is thinking about it more as he moves forward and ends up putting on the pig to show everyone how he feels but ends up getting killed. Simon shut people out because he was torn between doing the right thing and not doing the right thing. He understands that if he just goes away that he won’t have to be torn. Which shows that he would rather step back and think and look then to just jump to conclusions. Simon is mature for doing what he did. This is very important because it shows that people that you say you can trust you can’t and they stab you in the back. Simon is a very important person in the book and always will
I try to believe that it was an accident that Simon was killed, I try to think that he was asking for it by coming in the middle of the night through the jungle, screaming and what not, but I still cant help but think that Jack did kill him on purpose. On the night of Simon’s death, I realised something, that everything started going wrong because of Jack, everything traced back to him, he led everyone into the descent of savagery, it had gone too far. With the barbaric, animalistic murder of Simon, the last fragment of civilised order on the island was stripped away, and savagery took over. Now all of the boys in Jacks group have become inhuman savages. It’s all because of him.
Ralph explains that after Simons death, the young boys not only had to fear the chance of survival and fear the high probability that they would be there until they died also ended up fearing
As Simon wanders back to a beautiful meadow that he had traveled to before, he finds that it has changed. Instead of the peaceful meadow that Simon had discovered previously, the bloody head of a sow impaled by Jack and his follows taints the meadow. They had done this as an offering to the beast, hoping that the beast would be satisfied with the sow’s head and would give up hunting for the
Simon is shown by Golding as a martyr who died for the truth. He gave
The novel See ya Simon that is written by David Hill is a story of Nathan’s and his best friend Simon. It is based on two 14-year-old boys, which have a passion for girls, soccer, and weekends. Hill confronts death and Suffering in the novel by the main character Simon. Also his best friend Nathan confronts suffering in the novel, along with Mrs Shaw (Simon’s mother) confronts lots of suffering and death. Hill confronts death and suffering through one of the main characters, Simon.
this in order that she would drop me off at the pub. I was keen to get