Essay on Tour de France Drug Abuse

Blood transfusions became popular between the 1970s and 1980s with a diverse population of professional athletes. EPOs (a natural hormone made by the kidney’s) followed blood transfusions and gained their popularity in the late 1980s (Eichner). The effects of EPOs were seen through the many health risks that the athletes encountered including the death of 20 European cyclists over a period of 4 years (Eichner). The 1998 Tour de France also saw its fair share of EPO use among athletes with one team being disqualified and 6 more teams dropping out (Eichner). Later came the use of synthetic or artificial blood. In recent years athletes have been accused of, and caught, using all of these methods to increase their endurance and performance. Tests are improving to be able to detect when an athlete has used one of these methods.

A number of prominent athletes have recently experienced a 'fall from grace,' because of the revelation that they used performance-enhancing drugs. Perhaps the most famous example of this phenomenon is Lance Armstrong. In an advertisement for Nike that his former sponsor now no doubt regrets, Armstrong is shown asking the viewer "what am I on? I'm on my bike, busting my ass six hours a day." Professional cycling is often cited as one of the sports in which doping is most endemic to its subculture, however a number of professional sports have been embroiled in drug scandals. Because of the many revelations about the number of baseball players who used steroids to get their record-breaking statistics, the 1990s are often called the 'steroid' era of baseball. The Olympic track and field star Marian Jones was stripped of her medals, after finally admitting to the use of performance-enhancing drugs (Lardon 2008). "Despite the health risks, and despite the regulating bodies' attempts to eliminate drugs from sport, the use of illegal substances is widely known to be rife. It hardly raises an eyebrow now when some famous athlete fails a dope test" (Savulescu, Foddy, & Clayton 2004).

Alex Rodriguez is one of those athletes have been affected by steroids. Alex Rodriguez signed a massive contract with the New York Yankees for 275 million dollars on a 10 year contract (“Release”). Alex earned every penny of his contract until the postseason. Alex Rodriguez was known not to play too well in the playoffs, and this stayed true when the playoff came around. He did not play up to his contract, and this caused the fans to hate on him. For all his talent, Alex Rodriguez struggled to win over the harsh New York Yankee fans, and he even got criticism from teammates (“Rodriguez”). His fame took a hit just before the start of the 2009 MLB season, when he admitted to taking steroids earlier in his career (“Rodriguez”). This started to raise question about the unbelievable numbers Alex was putting up. Some would say Alex Rodriguez started to take steroids at an early age, Alex started in high school. Alex Rodriguez was affected in a medal was as well as in a social way. In 2003, Alex Rodriguez won the league's most valuable player award playing with the Texas Rangers. During the season, two Sports Illustrated reporters announced that Alex Rodriguez had been using performance enhancing drugs (“Yankees”). Up until 2006 in the MLB, steroids and other performance enhancing drugs were illegal, but people still did them. Nobody would check and test the athletes . Alex

I first learned about this topic on a television show I watch called Hawaii 5-O. The episode had a group of athletes that were blood doping in order to win bicycling races and to get a leg up on escaping the police after robbing their targets. It briefly explained what the group was doing, and why it made them have better stamina and bettered their athletic abilities. Then when Lance Armstrong was accused of many different types of performance enhancing drugs, he admitted to using blood doping among other techniques. He used the method of blood doping that utilizes EPO, which is a hormone that is produced in the kidney for RBC production. He was stripped of all the Tour de France titles in his possession and the bronze medal he won in the Olympics.

The following essay will defend the charges against Rebecca Racing in an attempt to have them dismissed. It will discuss the relevant facts and summary of the Australian Sports Anti-Doping Authority & Athletics Australia v Rebecca Racing case, a legal analysis of the contracts to which the athlete is bound, the jurisdiction of CAS, applicable provisions under the Athletics Australia Anti-Doping Policy, and relevant case law and applicable law to support this provision. These findings will prove that there is no sufficient proof to the required standard that Racing was in possession of a prohibited substance or was attempting use of a prohibited substance or prohibited method.

It also showed the consequences of cheating as he was stripped of his Tour de France wins. I believe that doping isn’t acceptable, especially in cycling. I feel like the people who legitimately train hard to be professional cyclers are being cheated, and I feel like the sport needs to be taken more seriously since many people believe that many cyclers are doping. Cycling is a great sport that takes years of training to be a professional, so I believe that if the UCI and the Tour de France committees take the sport more seriously than before, the sport could be more enjoyable for everyone

When it comes down to it he took steroids and testosterone and because of it won seven consecutive Tour De Frances. He won his first in 1999 and won every year up to and including 2005. He had been accused of drugs many times but every time he blatantly lied and said he had never taken any illegal substances. There had been many investigations and many old teammates planned to testify against him. But he kept pleading innocent. On August 24, 2012, the USADA (United States Anti-Doping Association) stripped him of his seven Tour wins and all honours won between 1999 and 2005 and they banned him from sport for life. He then came out in an interview with Oprah about all his past drug uses. This is totally unacceptable and is sending unacceptable messages to children as celebrities or sportspeople influence them a lot when they are young. He is influencing them that drugs are okay and that lying is acceptable. Therefore it is clear that Lance Armstrong is an appalling role model as he promotes lying and drug

stripped from his seven Tour de France titles because of his using. Armstrong and his

What made this incident of sports doping so monumental was the scandalous denials and self-proclaimed innocence. When the whole truth finally surfaced, it blackened Armstrong’s reputation and soiled his cycling achievements forever, making it one of the biggest sports doping scandals in history.

In Chapter 18 of Social Issues in Sport, Woods mentions how the first encounter with performance-enhancing drugs dates back to ancient times. This portrays how the usage of these drugs has become common within the sports world. Despite the fact that using performance-enhancing drugs is unfair in sport, I feel that it portrays the risk athletes are willing to take to win and be the best. This week we learned about the serious consequences that occur if an athlete is caught taking these medications. The consequences of taking these drugs range from getting their awards confiscated to legal action. There are similar consequences when it comes to situations involving the act of bribery. For example, during the 2002 Winter Olympics in Salt Lake City, the entire committee was replaced because of allegations that members were trying to influence voters through illegal means. Thus, when it comes to cheating in sport, it is not only athletes who engage in this deviant behavior, but also outside

Lance Armstrong and Barry Bonds were 2 very good athletes. In fact, “Barry Bonds has the record of most home runs” (Geron) and “Lance Armstrong won the Tour de France 7 times” (“Lance Armstrong Biography”). But, these two amazing athletes both have something in common. They both used PEDs. These people would not have performed as well as they did without the help of PEDs. Suzie Abernethy said, “I did not look at Lance Armstrong the same after I found out he was doping.” Without drug

‘Olympic track star Marion Jones was sentenced in a federal court to six months in prison.’ (Kelly and Rao, 2008) The reason why Jones was guilty is because of the use of performance enhancing drugs since 1999. More and more famous athletes prove to have used banned drugs to enhance their performance. At the same time, the role that the anti-doping agency is more and more important in the world wide games, such as Olympic Game, Tour de France. Nowadays, whether the performance enhancing drugs (PEDs) should be legalized has sparked a heated debate. However, the use of PEDs is morally wrong and it should be banned in sports. This essay will demonstrate three main points which explain the

book that says 80 percent of baseball players use some kind of illegal drug. There are many other players who have admitted to abusing drugs to take away the pain involved while playing sports.

The athletes was given pills not knowing what it was but the coaches knew and had to keep quiet and not say anything about the doping that was going on with their athletes which is wrong for them to not tell them of what is really inside of those drug but money play a huge

According to Dr. Charles E. Yesalis, a professor health and human development at Penn St. University, "drug use among athletes has gone dramatically up in recent years. Athletes also are becoming more venturesome about mixing different types of drugs. One reason is that new drugs keep coming on the market, and some turn out to be of help in giving athletes a competitive edge. Sports officials feel they have no choice but to try to combat drug use in sports with every legitimate weapon at their command. They are motivated in part by concern for athletes' well being. Most performance-enhancing agents have side effects that can pose an immediate or long-range threat to health. But the officials are driven by self-interest too. If the public perceive major sports to be hopelessly drug-ridden, attendance and television viewership is likely to plummet. And thatcould lead to financial ruin for athletes and promoters alike. The monetary stakes are higher today than ever before. Many of the top athletes damned very high salaries, and a select few demand huge additional sums for product endorsement. Pro team owners, meanwhile, are constantly scrambling for more income from broadcasting and other sources to meet their massive payrolls and still turn a profit. A series of drug scandals might well cause media outlets and corporate sponsors