Traditional & Learning Organizations

If an organization is already established and wants to become an “effective learning organization” they have to take into account their relationship with their employees at the time they make this decision. If the employees who currently work for management are not “self-energized, committed, responsible and creative beings” (Kinicki, 2012) (or any combination thereof) like McGregor assumes, they will not be able to jump in to some of the activities that leading organizations are doing. Managers will need to understand that if they developed an environment where management is superior and the employees are workers, any part of the human relations theory will not benefit them quickly. Managers will need to gain the trust of their employees and actually listen to their emotions.

2. Give your opinion on the current Organizational Learning Mechanism(s) (OLMs) that hinder organizational learning. Support your response with one (1) example of a training or learning initiative (e.g., sharing knowledge, training programs, working as a team, experiences, procedures, processes, etc.) and the outcome when it was applied to the organization.

Many companies are very keen and ready to clinch Work Base Learning in an organization, not mainly because it provide you with lifelong learning, but also it is an important ingredient of what Senge (1990) has termed as the ‘learning organization’. A learning organization is a place in which the learning and flair of persons is backed and promoted so that the organization itself be able to form its future and it also very important to gain competitive advantage.

This course covered many important topics helpful in understanding learning organizations. This paper will incorporate real-life situations from my organization, The American Red Cross. It will focus on three areas I found to be most helpful and relevant to my experience which is the understanding of systems thinking, growth, and the need to practice reflection.

Describe the five disciplines of Senge’s Learning Organisation. In your response, explain how each discipline could be used by a business to ensure that it is successful during a period of change.

There are many interpretations as to what defines a learning organization. But taking the sage

Just as students are learning at Post, organizations and the personnel within them need to continue to learn. Organizations need to continue to refine processes and focus on innovation. Organizational learning gives companies the ability to create, remember, and share knowledge within an organization. In order for an organization to be an effective learner they need to make it a focus on everyday work, practice it through all levels of the organization, create a focus on the creation, retention and transfer of knowledge through the organization, and solve problems where they begin, Organizational learning provides an opportunity to effect positive change throughout the organization. A company that is an organizational learner is one that is innovative, continually refining its processes and learns from its mistakes. Personal learning within an organization greatly enhances the organizations core competencies. It can be done through education and training programs. Such programs consist of schooling, training seminars, mentorships and on

Senge, P. M. (1990/2006). The fifth discipline: The art and practice of the learning organization. New York: Doubleday/Currency.

Organizational learning promotes: adaptability, participation and information openness. Consequently, not only employee performance will be enhanced, but also the increase of organizations effectiveness and efficiency.

Peter Senge was born in 1947, and he graduated in an engineering Stanford and then undertake a Master in Social Systems modelling at MIT (Massachusetts Institute of Technology) and after that he completed his PhD on Management (Mark,2001). According to Peter Senge , learning organizations are “ Organizations where people continuously expand their capacity to create the results they really want , where expanded and new patterns of thinking are developed, where collective goal is set free, and where people are continuously learning to see the whole together”.

Throughout our final semester of study at Maryville, our cohort has studied Peter Senge’s, The Fifth Discipline: The Art and Practice of the Learning Organization. Rather than set of management practices, the book describes how organizations, especially those that are sustainably competitive, know how to learn. These “learning organizations” are continuously learning how to work together, where the norm is producing their best. In the book, Senge identifies five essential elements, that when practiced together, create perfect conditions for an effective learning organization. These five practices are Personal Mastery, Mental Models, Shared Vision,

     In his book The Fifth Discipline, Peter Senge emphasizes his model of a "learning organization," which he defines as "an organization that is continually expanding its capacity to create its future." A learning organization excels at both adaptive learning and generative learning.

Today establishments that learn are continuously refining their methods and services by accumulation and mixing of new ideas and knowledge (Silberman, 2013). In recent years’ changes in education, know-how, and guideline, along with growing technology development makes it harder for establishments for organizational learning (Silberman, 2013). Each level activities offer different duties in an institution and the supervisors evaluate reevaluate how best to improve productivity (Silberman, 2013).

Continuous improvement programs is an uninterrupted effort to create entities superior and countless organizations rely on these for enhanced improvements. But why we need it? What we want from it? Why build it? A key prerequisite towards learning demands a strong commitment. However, an absenteeism of inclination to acquire fresh techniques, the organization is certain of reiterating the unchanged traditional methods. These act as a pull-down force against improvement. Three M’s: Method, management and measurement are the basic components of launching learning organization. Moreover, a proper understanding of the basic components is necessary for moving forward. A fresh perception for problem-solving, experimentation, learning from past experiences & others and transferring knowledge is essential for developing long lasting improvements. Various executives from Analog devices, Chaparral Steel, Xerox, IBM, and Boeing have understood their shortcomings and developed an improved version with the modern viewpoint. Motorola executives used the benchmarking approach for the organization. Garvin refers to various terminologies about the learning organization by different scholars such as Peter Senge and Nonoka. Senge recommends the use of five component technologies that consists of system thinking, personal mastery, mental models, shared visions & team building to achieve the learning organization. Furthermore, Nonoka strategy claims over account focus thinking, encourage

Continuous improvement programs is an uninterrupted effort to create entities superior and countless organizations rely on these for enhanced improvements. But why we need it? What we want from it? Why build it? A key prerequisite towards learning demands a strong commitment. However, an absenteeism of inclination to acquire fresh techniques, the organization is certain of reiterating the unchanged traditional methods. These act as a pull-down force against improvement. Three M’s: Method, management and measurement are the basic components of launching learning organization. Moreover, a proper understanding of the basic components is necessary for moving forward. A fresh perception for problem-solving, experimentation, learning from past experiences & others and transferring knowledge is essential for developing long lasting improvements. Various executives from Analog devices, Chaparral Steel, Xerox, IBM, and Boeing have understood their shortcomings and developed an improved version with the modern viewpoint. Motorola executives used the benchmarking approach for the organization. Garvin refers to various terminologies about the learning organization by different scholars such as Peter Senge and Nonoka. Senge recommends the use of five component technologies that consists of system thinking, personal mastery, mental models, shared visions & team building to achieve the learning organization. Furthermore, Nonoka strategy claims about account focus thinking, encourage