Traditional Teaching Method Versus New Teaching Method

Do you know that our country is in the process of upgrading the learning system day by day? It started from school level to university or college level, the Ministry of Education is trying to improve our learning system for all the level of students. The purpose in this matter is to help the students to get a better education for their future. As you know, the education is the main role to achieve the goal in someone’s life. The definition of education is the act or process of imparting acquiring general knowledge, developing the powers of reasoning and judgment and generally of preparing oneself or others intellectually for mature life. People might do not realized the differences between traditional and modern learning system but, there also have one similarity for both of it.

Students have their own best way in effectively learning the lesson. With the diversity of students, the problem is each student has a preferred learning style. It becomes undeniably one of the reasons that make it difficult to achieve the best expected outcome out of teachers’ effort. However, teachers try to incorporate various teaching techniques to make every learning opportunity become productive, meaningful, and relevant for the learners.

\item The teachers always want their lessons to be interesting and they introduce the real life problem before they can go deep into the content of the subject.

From this we further investigate and try to understand the different theorist’s point of view and how their theories affect each individuals learning, in order to assist a teacher when preparing the lessons.

It is important to decide at an early stage on the most appropriate teaching method for each candidate, to enable every candidate to achieve their learning goal in the easiest way possible. Some candidates will not respond well to classroom style teaching and may require one to one assistance for them to develop, others may develop their understanding better through demonstration or through explanations given by the tutor.

The very nature of the Socratic Method makes for long and winding discussions, because the Method aims to strip away any falsehoods but provides few tools for building towards the truths for which it aims. Without a way to cull the ideas presented by the students, a professor must engage each of them as comprehensively as the next regardless of their accuracy, or else compromise the integrity of the dialogue. If he or she instead opts to inseminate information in a more traditional education style, each lecture and discussion can be tailored to divulge a specific concept and a specific and relevant set of arguments and objections can be presented and rejected, rather than struggling through a freeform conversation with inconsistent results varying from classroom to classroom (Ford 3) (Chen and Taylor).

A teacher must plan the order of questions in which they’ll be asked as well as nature of the content. It is observed that most of the teachers use constructive approach i-e starting from simple questions or concepts to more abstract questions. The primary role of a teacher is to analyse the understanding level of a student. This is usually carried out by students response and later examine it with follow-up questions.

However in the teacher centered approaches do not give much attention to the learners needs. The teacher carries out the lesson as a lecture and there is not much interaction between the two parties and the students remain as passive recipients of the knowledge (Kavanoz,

new and interesting way to learn, students are able to comprehend the material in a more efficient

Unfortunately, the way we practice education in schools is not always related to these purposes. Some teachers prefer to talk rather than teach. What I mean by this is that some teachers think teaching is just delivering the information and the facts from a book directly to the students. When we asked them why they would reply because this is what teacher should be. One day I was working on a group assignment, and a question that we had to answer was what a concept in schools that our group should revise and why. Therefore, we decided to revise the traditional way of teaching (delivering information) to help students to have critical skills. During our meeting, one of the group’s members said, “I have been teaching for twenty years, and I

To explain, this method helps students to express themselves verbally, stir their thinking process also teaching them how to agree and disagree. The author seems to make a strong point in open exchange of ideas with others will learn both the existence and validity of other points of view. I feel that in sharing testimonies of truth will perhaps drastically change other ideas or give a different perspective. By the same token, it seems teaching by discussion, wrong conclusions may be corrected, creative thinking stimulated, and problem-solving techniques are learned which can be applied in all aspects of

Students must method it, examine it and create it in order to be actively taking part in the learning method. Schooling has seldom allowed students to think for themselves, therefore Freire refers to “reflection” as a balanced relationship a teacher and student ought to have. They encourages thinking freely and development of new theories. Teachers might learn new student experiences and new point of views. Both could learn different learning techniques, creative ways to present materials to make it fascinating, yet

By practicing the problem posing method, students are more willing to participate in class and ask questions. By asking questions and bringing up new topics in the class, new discoveries are made because students are comfortable enough to express their opinions. Also, with this level of comfort in place, students can contradict ideas and questions other people may bring up in class. As Freire stated, “liberating education consists in acts of cognition, not transferals

1. The main goal of the analysis being conducted is to assess whether the new curriculum on basic electricity in basic science yields better achievement outcomes compared to the existing curriculum, which is a more traditional teaching approach, for elementary school students in both urban and suburban schools. In doing this analysis some questions that will be key to this study is to reveal if this new curriculum is beneficial when compared to the traditional teaching approach. Indeed, some students are randomly assigned to both the new curriculum and to the traditional teaching approach. As a result, through this randomization biases will be kept from occurring. This investigation is important because it will be determined what yielded better results through focusing on examining differences in the posttest variable for children who did or did not experience the new curriculum.

Furthermore, promoting the expression of ideas in a free, non judgmental way in the classroom is of great importance. The way teachers can understand the student’s point of view on various topics and may be the outcome of this can be greater appreciation and understanding.