Training And Development Between Hard Model And Soft Model Of Human Resource Management

Most organizations do not follow-up on the benefits of training as regards staff performance. As a result of this they don’t take training and development as an important factor in organizational growth and survival. Most manages do not know how to assess the return on investment in training, nor are they equipped with the necessary management tools to monitor the decision making process of such investment. It has been discovered that training and development budget is the first cut when the organization is faced with difficulties because most of them are of the opinion that investment in the area of training and development is not linked to the bottom line of the business. Globalization and rapid technological development has changed the conditions for companies and increased competition in the world markets. The quality of a company’s human resources is the key driver for sustained top-level performance. It has become crucial to continually invest in human resource development in order to guarantee success in the global market. As earlier said, managers engage in minimal training thereby not giving quality training to their employees, this in turn affects the overall outcome of the training and the performance of the staff. Most organizations that have a competitive image see more reasons to train their workers than those who are on the lower rung of the ladder of recognition, but training and development is still needed to create a niche. In the light of the above,

For Human Resource departments, finding ways to motivate employees can be frustrating. Some Human Resource departments use incentives like days off or even big ticket items like tablets for rewards. Others use monetary motivation like extra pay for a few hours or even a bonus check. Understanding the theories that drive motivation will help a manager or even Human Resources department find what while work for their employees. For this assignment, I am going to describe and discuss several motivation theories. In order for a managing team to be successful an understanding of these basic theories is the key for success.

A good human resource department is essential to any successful businesses in today’s society. Before human resource managers were seen as people who deal with employee disputes and little more, now this is just one small part of their role to organisations. Human resource is a huge department for reasons as being a key planner in helping company’s employee performances. In this essay I will be exploring the different types of personnel management that is used, assessing the roles of human resource practitioners, Evaluating the responsibilities of human resource practices and evaluating the process of job evaluations and the main factors which determine pay whilst describing the link between motivational theories. I will also explore the different organisational approaches to monitoring staff performances in doing so I will show evidence of my research by referencing appropriate material.

The purpose of this paper is to discuss motivation in the workplace. To have a successful company, employee must be motivated enough to work and get the job done. One way have success in the workplace is to define the morale and motivate employees. The human resource department or the manager are typically the personnel to identify the employees needs by either observing the generation, the psychological contract, or the main theories that were postulated by Victor Vroom (Vroom's expectancy theory), Abraham Maslow (hierarchy of needs), Frederick Herzberg (theory of motivation), Douglas McGregor (theory X and Y).

Human Resources is dependent on the success, happiness, and contentment of employees that keep the business on course. Motivation is one of the best ways to push employees forward while making sure everyone is in a comfortable position in their job. Motivational theories just attempt to explain what motivates or makes people act the way that they do. The goal of understanding these theories and their outcomes is to ensure a better performance from each employee, and to give each of those employees the best situation they can have in the workplace. Visionaries such as Abraham Maslow, Frederick Herzberg, and Henry A. Landsberger also brought forward new ways of management and ways to handle internal situations that changed the landscape of human resources as a whole. Motivational theories instituted in the workplace have a commonly positive effect on both employees and management, showing that it is important to strive for proven motivational practices.

These are the respective theories of motivation and how it may drive an employee commitment in an organization. Five approaches of amplification behavior; needs, reinforcement, cognition, job characteristics, and feelings/emotions – underlie the evolution of modern theories of human motivation. In this motivational theory effort, the following motivation theories were selected; need theories, equity theory, expectancy theory, and job design model given their emphasis and reported significance on employee retention.

process features. Monks K. et al (2006) states that what is important it is not

The literature review, explain the theories which are related to the case study’s problems in order to the motivation and satisfy employees’ needs. There are three important theories include; organizational motivation justice, Maslow’s hierarchy needs theory, and expectancy theory.

It is the duty of the Human Resource department to provide the employees of the company with opportunities to develop skills and improve themselves. Training is not only a way to develop employees but also a strategy to retain, develop, and reward employees. Training does have an effect on productivity, safety, and development. Employee development can change an organization, and it employees just by using planned and unplanned training. The company can succeed in maintaining an advantage for the organization. Training and development is a critical aspect of an organization 's talent management strategy. Every organization needs to invest in it to attract and retain talent and grow their employees ' knowledge base and capabilities (HR

This assignment will outline the different theories of managing people and explain their effectiveness within differing workplace situations. Two theories of managing people will be applied to the two important theories the business will need to make. It will cover the difference between leadership and management; lastly, it will detail how the correct use of motivational theory can motivate employees during a big change within an organisation.

Human resource management has frequently been described as a concept with two distinct forms: soft and hard. These are diametrically opposed along a number of dimensions, and they have been used by many commentators as devices to categorize approaches to managing people according to developmental-humanist or utilitarian-instrumentalist principles (Legge 1995 b).

Employee motivation is a hugely important factor regarding the efficiency and productivity of any organization. Though there are many management theories regarding how employees are best motivated, the majority of these specific theories fall under two broad categories. On the one hand, there is the scientific management theory, or classical approach, in which employees are treated as mechanical components of an organization and motivated purely by economic incentive (Almusaileem, 2012). On the other is the human relations approach, which theorizes that employees are best motivated through group dynamics, human relations and the meeting of social needs (Almusaileem, 2012). However, management theory is significantly more complicated. Each individual responds to motivation differently, and often, the grouping of all employees under one motivating factor or another is ineffective. Personally, I find the human relations approach to be significantly better motivator through the focus on psychological and social needs of the individual (Almusaileem, 2012). Additionally, I find that the human relations approach leaves room for creativity and entrepreneurship, which classical management theory lacks. Most importantly, the human relations approach provides significantly more reward than classical production incentives. Taylor’s theory of scientific management may have made sense in the early part of the twentieth century, in which most employees worked in the industrial

The author’s purpose for this paper is to broaden the readers understanding of the role human resource management plays within the context of both employee and organizational success. This paper begins with a look at the historical roots that lay the foundation for the growing need of human resource management (HRM). Some histories believe that HRM can be traced back to medieval times while other argue that human resources functions were not clearly grouped together and identified until the early 1900’s. Human resource management is an accumulation of many different theories and practices. Management, psychology, sociology, anthropology, and economics all have a place within the practice of human resource management. Motivation theory attempts to explain what factors play an integral part in the daily decisions employees and manager make including showing up for work, deciding on the amount of effort to exert at work, and cultural dynamics within the organization. The second part of this paper use comparison and contrast to identify and better understand organizational theories of motivation. Lastly, an organizational issue related to motivation will be presented and the use of previously learned outcomes will be applied in an attempt to solve the problem in the most effective way possible.

Motivation is all grounds which cause someone to conduct a specific action or to tend to accomplish certain goals (Hauser, 2014). The most important factors is motivation which influencing human behavior and performance.The Project teams commitment directly related with the level of motivation which directly affect the overall success of the company or organization. Employees motivation crucially decide organiazational success as they are the major resources of organizations. To achieve overall organizational goal organization should acquire clear understanding between employees and develop the factors of motivation to increase the performance (Wan Fauziah Wan Yusoff, 2013). Managers have to start a motivation program when they see result of a motivaton is a happyier worker. Increased output, cost reduced, increase profitability is an result of effective motivation (Davidmann, 1989). Through a study figure out that, most employees can keep their jobs without being fired by working only 25% of their total ability when motivated same workers working 85-90% of their total ability to achieve goals (Rodda, 1997). HRM practices working as a lever to increase the motivation of employees. They have few variables like- training, competition, promotion, performance appraisal, incentive, rewards, skill based compensation which are the number of efficient factors (Fey, 2009). Through job satisfaction and postive motivation Human Resource Management practices directly influnces

Organizations around the globe understand clearly the needs of the people they serve. For employees, the need for training is always to enhance their capacity in a way that helps them to perform their work effectively. Scholars in the sociological and business sectors have developed effective approaches to improving the performance of employees (Jackson-Dwyer, 2013). For business, the reason behind the enhanced training programs is to increase the competency level of their employees in a way that effectively contributes to the success of their organizations. People are drivers of change, and this is normally witnessed when there is a change. Also, people are the key elements in an organization as they are always the first people in that organization to feel the impact of any change. However, it must be understood that the improvement of people 's productivity does not mean training and development. Research has shown that proper incentives and motivation are also effective in delivering on objectives of the company (Kelley, 2013). Furthermore, the personal aim of people to grow in the jobs and career can help in achieving the objectives of their companies.