Trauger Case Summary

CM picked client up from her niece’s home at 7:00am to meeting with her attorney, Rosemary Traub, at the courthouse at 7:30am for her schedule hearing 8:30am regarding her request for a protection order against her ex-husband. Ms. Traub also brought along with her, Gail Starr, from SANE to testify as an expert witness to discuss bruising as the police officer testified in the last hearing that he did not see any bruising on our client when he responded to the call. Additionally, Ms. Traub also subpoenaed the EMT that responded to our client on the day of the DV incident. The hearing started late at about 9:00am after the interpreter line was set up. The hearing officer first discussed the absence of the police officer as he was supposed to

On 04/13/2017 Tashia Couts was sent home on suspension due to threats made via Social Media to Amaiya Weston in which case she stated that she felt unsafe and did not even want to take a luch or walk to her car. John Hammann walked Amaiya to her car and watched as she left safely. Amaiya also felt unsafe due to a comment Shacora Wiggins made as she was escorted out on a suspension as well by John Hammann.

FACTS: Douglas E. Metzger lived in an apartment in Lincoln, Nebraska. About 7:45 a.m on April 30, 1981 a residence of the apartment complex was parking his vehicle directly in front of Metzger’s apartment window. Metzger was standing naked with his arms at his side for five seconds. At 8:00 a.m two officers had arrived to the apartment, they observed Metzger standing naked in front of the window eating cereal. The officers said that Metzger was nude from mid-thigh on up and he was standing a foot of the window. Douglas Metzger had violated the Lincoln Municipal Code which stated, that it was unlawful for a person in the city of Lincoln to commit any indecent exposure in the presence of another person.

Yesterday, 03.06.2018, Trezkerian was assessed at Brentwood for his suicidal behavior. At his therapeutic foster home, Trezkerian ran into the road attempting to get hit by vehicles. At the home, he was also throwing, and destroying things at the home. Law enforcement became involved, and transported Trezkerian to Brentwood, where he was assessed. Brentwood wanted to admit him, but there were no beds available; he was placed on the waiting list. Per the unknown therapeutic foster parent, she did not want him back into her home, because of his aggressive behavior. The unknown CPS worker for Trezkerian became involved, and took him back into the home, even after the foster parent stated she did not want him back into the home. When Trezkerian went back in

Many observers in Williamson County wondered if the matter would end there. Rarely have Texas prosecutors had to answer tough questions about their conduct, even in the wake of wrongful convictions. But in February, Judge Harle ruled that the investigation conducted by Michael’s lawyers suggested that there was probable cause to believe Anderson had broken the law in failing to turn over evidence that was “highly favorable” to the defense. Harle recommended that the Texas Supreme Court launch a court of inquiry to look into the matter. A week later, the Supreme Court concurred with Harle’s findings and ruled that an inquiry should proceed. Anderson would have to answer for his alleged misconduct.

Personally I don’t believe that Chief Pirsig, should have even been given the working role of Chief. Being the Chief of police takes a lot of work and you must be able to make quick decisions when needed. Because the chief did not feel comfortable making unanticipated decisions in unsettled circumstance, I don’t think he should be the Chief of the police department. He clearly had so much anxiety about making a decision he was physically ill and had to take days off from work.

Greg Meyer, a Cincinnati Native, has a background in logistics and installations services. Having recently managed furniture installations for numerous school districts nationwide, he plans to use his knowledge and experience to become a strong resource at Loth. In his spare time he enjoys biking, snowboarding, and playing with his two boxer

Earlier this year, Jeremiah Raber made headlines for a very public fight with his wife, Carmela. The two were reportedly very vocal with one another, and she was accusing him of domestic abuse. The police got involved and Carmela even took off for a while. Raber was all apologies on social media, begging for his wife to come back home. He promised to attend counseling and work on his alcohol habits, however, things have reportedly not changed between the two. Despite Carmela leaving Jeremiah after the initial domestic abuse was alleged, she moved back with him.

This particular case, involving the SEC, Coopers & Lybrand, and California Micro Devices, Inc. encompasses charges for neglecting to comply with auditing standards. The Securities and Exchange Commission makes these charges against Michael Marrie, audit partner, and Brian Berry, manager, of Coopers & Lybrand. There are three main areas in which the auditing standards were not in compliance, a write-off of accounts receivable, confirmation of accounts receivable and sales returns and allowances. The Securities and Exchange Commission make these accusations against Michael and Brian for failure

A. The history and characteristics of the defendant. As stated in the PSR, Bah’s experienced rejection, abandonment, and loneliness in his childhood. Unlike most children, Bah was not raised by his parents. His mother died when he was a child and his father brought him to the United States from Sierra Leone. Once in the United States, he was left in the care of Aisha Bah, his stepmother, while his father spent the majority of his time in Sierra Leone.

The appellant Delwin Vriend’s employment as a laboratory operator at the King’s College in Edmonton was terminated after he revealed that he was homosexual. Despite Vriend’s great work performance, his termination appeal and reinstatement was rejected (Vriend v. Alberta, 1998 at para 7). Since discrimination on the ground of sexual orientation was not included in the

Paul Branzburg was a reporter for The Courier-Journal, Louisville, and worked on the article about young people synthesizing hashish from marihuana, which brought them about $5,000 in three weeks. He investigated the issued of drug use in Louisville and wrote two articles about it. The first article contained a picture of unknown hands holding hashish, and the second was written based on the interviews with drug users. Both of the sources requested not to be identified. After a few month of the publication, Branzburg was issued a subpoena by a grand jury about illegal actions they were witnessing, because the articles caught the attention of the local law-enforcement personnel. He was requested to name his sourced. He refused to testify, based

This memo is to recommend that ttools should stop negotiations with Palm and take immediate legal action through patent litigation means. This action is needed in order to protect ttools’ innovation and for survivability of ttools business. Based on the design patent and non-disclosure agreement with Palm it is very clear that Palm has committed the infringement hence chances of ttools winning of litigation case are high. There are high chances that Palm might consider to settle the litigation before going to the trial of the case as they knew that they have

Tom, Merchants Walk has been great, the department is performing well, I cannot beat the commute and my second anniversary with The Home Depot is just around the corner. I am still interested in growth opportunity and was hoping we might have an opportunity to reconnect to explore whether any needs in the finance group have changed or perhaps you might be able to point me to someone within Kelly Barrett’s organization. I understand Home Services is an important part of the growth plan and have some direct experience with some of our programs, as well as some ideas re how and where we can manage and improve. Understanding Kelly’s finance and audit background, I believe it could be another potential fit. Regards, Richard

The situation began to unfold when the Securities and Exchange Commission was probing into a restatement of the company's stock price. Kozlowski's business practices raised some eyebrows. In 1999, the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) initiated an inquiry into Tyco's practices that resulted in a restatement of the company's earnings. In January, 2002, questionable accounting practices came to light. Tyco had forgiven a $19 million, no-interest loan to Kozlowski in 1998 and had paid the CEO's income taxes on the loan. It was found that he company's stock price had been overrated, and that the CEO and CFO had sold 100 million dollars' worth of shares, and then stated to the public that he was holding them, which was a misrepresentation and misled the investors.