Travel Ban In America Pros And Cons

The Travel Ban marks a major turning point in the policies on immigration in the United States. Due to increased terrorist attacks and illegal immigrant numbers rising, it is believed that temporarily banning immigrants from particular countries is key to ensuring safety within the United States. Though many have expressed their concern towards the ban because of its similarity to previous discriminatory and unconstitutional acts. The ban has even been referred to as the “Muslim Ban”.

Met with mass protest and public outrage, the original travel ban was an executive order issued on January 27,2017. The ban rolled out an elaborate scheme said to protect the American people and “Make America Great Again”. The ban set a cap of 50,000 refugees to be accepted into the USA during 2017. It also included a temporary ban on Syrian refugees as well as people arriving from seven countries with predominantly Muslim populations. After being found in violation Immigration & Nationality Act of 1965 due to its discriminatory nature, the order is now back and has been redrafted.

While the controversy regarding Trump’s travel ban, which restricts immigrants from seven (now six) predominantly Muslim countries that are threats for terrorism from entering the United States for three months, has been split down the middle, the debate of how lawmakers should ensure that the statement “The United States has the world’s most generous immigration system” (“Fact Sheet” 6 March) remain true while still ensuring the safety of U.S. citizens has sparked. Because of the fact that Trump is making a vast assumption based on the stereotypes of seven individual countries to make his decision without considering those within these countries who are not actual threats to our safety, one can see that his plan simply will not work. Instead, American lawmakers can find a balance between maintaining an open, welcoming society and protecting U.S. citizens by continuing to legislate the same immigration laws that have been in place prior to Trump’s travel ban during Obama’s presidency, which have proven

President Trump's executive order " Muslim Ban" blocking people of Iran, Iraq, Sudan, Syria, Libya, Yemen, and Somalia from coming to the U.S. Trump’s ideology is to protect the American people from Muslim terrorist attacks to make America safe again. Trump and his team may not be aware that by combining Muslims and terrorists; they spreading the suspicion, fear and consequently rising Islamophobia and racism. The ban disrupting the personal and professional lives of millions of immigrants who have been settled their life in America with the hope of freedom and fortune. Unfortunately, mainstream media have been controlling the flow of information, brainwashing and manipulating people, spreading misrepresentations and fears about Muslim, and

However, President Trump’s “travel ban” is discriminatory and unconstitutional. As a candidate for presidency, Trump called for a "ban on Muslims." And when the executive order was signed, there was a focus not just on terrorists, but "Islamic"

Although people believe that this executive order was for the protection of the people, there are still many factors that were poorly implemented in the law. The War on Terror is very crucial to our lives today and should not be taken lightly. The ban is on highly integrated Muslim countries, which imposes the fact that the U.S. does not favor these countries in general, posing a problem for both the U.S. and the seven nations banned.

Donald Trump tried to put in place a travel ban but it is not very effective. The travel ban is only for six countries. Those countries are Syria, Libya, Iran, Yemen, Chad, and Somalia. The travel ban is applied to them because they are considered the major Muslim majority. That is not very effective because Muslims and terrorist do not only live in those 6 countries.

In November 2016, Donald Trump was elected as president of the United States. This took a toll for many Americans and the potential changes coming our way. After a few months of his presidency, immigration became the spotlight of news discussions and social media. It started with a wall being built along the United States and Mexican border to the current travel ban. There has been pros and cons towards immigration, whether or not it would benefit or hurt our society. In the article, “The Pros and Cons of the Trump Immigration Ban Policy,” the author analyzes the pros and cons of the immigration ban policy presented by President Donald Trump. Saladan analyzes information on the growing refugee population from 1975 to 2017. The author begins their argument with the potential outcomes of restricting travel of foreigners and the different countries that are banned, which involved North Korea and 5 middle eastern countries. Saladan conveys important details regarding the refugee policy’s within this ban. He continues to state the influence with religious beliefs coming into play with this policy. Saladan states, “One of the most controversial parts of the order is under its section on refugee policy, namely its prioritization of religious minorities claiming religious persecution.” (Saladan 1) In the article, Saladan and I share the same view of the refugee policy and the effects of millions based on the implementations of

Within the first paragraph it says, “He had even vowed not only to “bomb the sh-t” of the Islamic State fighters in Syria but also to “Take out their families” – another likely war crime.” This would not sit well with some people, some people’s morale conscious would not want this to happen. Just after that it say, “he made his next move, an extraordinary call to bar all Muslims from entering the U.S, including tourists and business travelers, a direct challenge to the nation’s constitutional right to the free exercise of religion.” Banning a certain group from the United States because of their religion I like saying someone cannot come into your house because they are a different skin color, it is just

In my opinion based on the whole Trump travel ban, I think that it is wrong to ban a certain religion. I mean as of now, they changed the travel ban about so many times and now it is only letting people in United States if they have close family members, but i feel like it will not work. There are many people coming here to the United States and have the dream to live here and have a better life for their family but the government's just barring them from entering here. And now they're trying to eliminate legal immigration for new people trying to enter here and it could create more chaos which 2 senators are trying to create. How would you know a person's religion when they check at the airport? That is just wrong towards that type of people

The travel ban is an executive order which was put into place by President Donald Trump’s administration on January 27th, 2017. The order was put into place for our national security to “protect the nation from foreign terrorist entry into the United States.” This measure banned travel into the U.S. for 90 days from Iran, Iraq, Libya, Somalia, Sudan, Syria, and Yemen. This obviously sparked an outcry from social media, which caused a divide among Americans. With a show of hands, how many of you think that the travel ban is actually a ban on Muslim refugees and that it is racist. Recent polls show that 57% of Americans favor the temporary ban while 33% are opposed to it, and 10% are still undecided. Racism, fascism, and Islamophobia; these words have all taunted supporters of President Trump and the travel ban. The one thing people don’t realize is that the travel ban isn’t banning Muslims from America. Who in the room can name the top 5 countries with the most Muslims. They are Indonesia, India, Pakistan, Bangladesh and Nigeria. Not one of these countries are listed in the ban. This ban is only for only ninety days, and is aimed at countries who have sent a large contingency of terrorists to the U.S. The countries selected have active terrorist training camps, and Trump is not the individual who selected the countries on the list. These countries are unstable, with no reliable vetting procedures. We shouldn’t admit people until they can meet our security screening standards.

After the signing of the executive order, Muslims from Malaysia were demonstrating requesting for justice for their fellow men. The business sector will be disadvantaged since they will have to seek investors from the Middle East and not from Malaysia as they did previously (Shelby, 2016). The rift between Muslims and non-Muslims may increase because the executive order portrays Muslims as terrorist making them feel rejected by the US. The rift between the Muslims and the non-Muslims will even trigger more terrorist attacks (Mckissen, 2017).. Who said terrorism is the leading cause of deaths in the US? Most of the residents of the US die as a result of accidents and diseases and not terrorism hence banning innocent people from the US is a social injustice. Therefore, it is evident that Trump has deprived the banned Muslims the freedom to interact and trade in the

On Facebook, I sought out opinions on this social justice issue by searching through public postings for the hashtags #travelban, #muslimban, #nobannowall, #refugees, #Americafirst, and #buildthewall. The vast majority of views presented by those using these hashtags were against the ban. One common theme held by those against the ban is that it was discriminatory. By adding Venezuela and North Korea to the list, the social media opinion is that Trump is trying to distract from it being a racist ban targeting Muslims. For example, Aram Shahinfard (2017) states in his Facebook update, “So he added a few more countries to make it a not-muslim ban? It is still not acceptable!” His Facebook friend,

Terrorism has been a major problem for all people in the 21st century, with so much fear in our lives there have been regulations and rules set by the government to protect its citizens. The US has tried many different ways to prevent terrorism, but perhaps the most controversial are the travel bans. In the last year there have been several executive orders signed by the president banning travel into the United States from specific countries. Many of the previous presidents have placed travel bans for the protection of the country but there have been more objections to the ones of 2017 than ever before. Travel bans have been placed for multiple reasons, but for the most part, all are said to share the goal of protecting the American people. Travel bans disrupt the lives of people all over the world, and in the last year they have caused major upset due to the ban on Muslim majority countries, but even with all the controversy, some people believe that these bans are the best way to combat terrorism.

Be it resolved that the United States fully repeals the travel ban due to the discriminatory effects it has on some people. The travel ban is a terrible executive order that was put into place by President Trump on january 27th of 2017. The travel ban was put into place to protect the United States by not allowing any citizen from seven muslim countries to enter. These seven countries are; Iran, Iraq, Libya, Somalia, Sudan, Syria, and Yemen. These countries were targeted due to supposed risks of these countries harboring extremists groups such as Isis or Al-qaeda. According to the article “Trump's executive order: Who does travel ban affect?,” by BBC News, “ The travel ban suspensions the US refugee program for 120 days, places and indefinite ban on Syrian refugees and suspends all visas of incoming immigrants of the seven banned countries” (BBC News). The seven countries are heavily muslim, however most of the people in these countries are no threat to the United States in any way. Why is the United States completely discriminating the islamic religion when we are founded on the basis of religious freedom. Not everyone who is muslim is a terrorists so why are we punishing a lot of good people for the actions of very few. Most of the terrorist attacks that have happened since 9/11 have been carried out by a U.S citizen, so are we going to start deporting all muslim U.S citizens? The islamic religion is not the problem it's the radicalistic idea that some people