Treating Information Privacy Flaws Of The Federal Trade Commission Act Essay

In the wake of September 11, many things happened very quickly. Along with the beginning of a '"'war'"' against terrorism, an act was passed to help prevent future terrorism in the USA. The name of this is the USA Patriot Act. The act legalizes many surveillance techniques that were once prohibited. The act has been passed without debate, and the new privileges given to our government have not been thoroughly examined. The law enforcers of our country are now capable of monitoring the citizens in ways most people are not aware of. Some of the surveillance laws are self-terminating after four years, but many of the more important laws are permanent. What will these new surveillance laws be used for after the war on

According to the plaintiff in the Coleman v. Kohl’s Department Stores, Inc., et al., Case No. 15-cv-2588 (N.D. Calf.). In June of 2015 Kohl’s Department Stores Inc. allegedly used ambiguous and misleading language to obtain credit reports from job applicants in violation of the Fair Credit Reporting Act (FCRA). As a result of the confusing and misleading application materials, plaintiff alleges that Kohl’s obtained a credit report and claims that Kohl’s willfully violated a recent warning by the (FTC) Federal Trade Commission to display background check disclosures to job applicants in plain language and on a separate document.

According to Dictionary.com confidentiality is “the right of an individual to have personal, identifiable medical information kept private.” The definition for this term is widely known in health care, but when it is applied to adolescents many people do not understand the basics. Doctors are responsible for informing adolescent patients and their parents the privacy a minor is given according to federal and state laws, but in some cases doctors fail to do so. This results in the misunderstanding of minor’s privacy rights, which can lead to the adolescent patient not disclosing significant information, and the parents assuming they have the right to all of their child’s medical records. Because of this, it is important for adolescents and their parents to understand the nature of confidentiality in health care.

A broken, gloomy country was left to grieve for the lives of loved ones that were lost the day after the 9/11 attacks. Time was needed to cope. However, what the people really wanted was assurance. They wanted to feel safe in their homes and not worry about more attacks like this happening in the future. The government also wanted to give people the security that they craved. However, the way they chose to pursue the situation angered many citizens. The National Security Agency reformed privacy laws that some believe were not well-examined by Congress because they wanted them in affect as soon as possible. These reforms are included in what is called the Patriot Act (Department of Justice).

On January 28, 2017, the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit issued its Opinion In Re Horizon Healthcare Services, Inc. data breach litigation, - - - F.3rd - - - -, 2017 WL 242554 (3rd Cir. Jan. 20, 2017) (copy enclosed herewith as Exhibit “A”). In a case arising under the FDCPA sister statute, the Fair Credit Reporting Act (FCRA) 15 USC § 1692(1) arising out of a data breach resulting from theft of two (2) health insurers laptop computers. The named Plaintiffs sued under the FCRA claiming that their personal information had been stolen leading to the unauthorized transfer of personal information prohibited by the FCRA. The trial court (per Judge Cecchi) dismissed the case for lack of standing holding that the Plaintiffs had not stated a cognizable under Article

Digital privacy concerns, which have been a major issue in our country since 2001, increasingly violate our basic human rights as global citizens. The growing amount of government surveillance has manifested in the enactment of acts such as SOPA and CISPA. Although their intent on stopping digital piracy and attacks were clear, both were immediately met with harsh criticism; they allowed big corporations to violate our privacy rights by sharing our personal information with both other companies and the government. Our President, although publicly expressing his acknowledgement of the issue, failed to discuss an array of other pressing dilemmas regulated by the recently exposed National Security Agency (NSA), especially those involving

The government argued that the warrantless ex parte seizure of 27,000 private e-mails was not a violation of the Fourth Amendments prohibition on unreasonable searches and seizures. The government argued that the e-mails gathered from Warshak did, in fact, violate the fourth Amendment but the government relied on good faith on the Stored Communications Act (“SCA”) (Craig, 2013). The Stored Communications Act permits a government entity to compel a service provider

This paper will discuss the decision of the FISA Court (FISC) regarding the Federal Bureau of Investigation's (FBI) July 18, 2013 Application for Certain Tangible Things for Investigations to Protect Against International Terrorism. This application is for an order pursuant to the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act of 1978 (FISA) Title 50, United States Code 1861. This is also known as Section 215 of the USA Patriots Act which requires the ongoing daily production of the National Security Agency (NSA) of certain call detail records or “telephony meta-data” in bulk.

The FTC sued Garvey (as well as Enforma and Media Interactive) for allegedly enterprise deceptive acts or practices and issue false and dishonest advertising in violation of Sections 5(a) and twelve of the Federal Trade Commission Act. once a full trial on the deserves, the district court dominated in favor of Garvey. The Ninth Circuit Affirmed that call.

The Federal Privacy Act was implemented in 1974 to establish a co de of fair information policies that dominate the selection, upkeep, use, and the spread of information abou t individuals that is conserved in systems of records by federal agencies. This act was put into place to protect individuals’ privacy from the embezzlement of Federal records, to ensure that individuals be allowed entry to records concerning them which are maintained by Federal agencies. Priva cy laws are concerning laws that allocate with control, keep , and using of personally distinguishable information of individuals, which can be collected by governments, public or private organizations, or by other individuals. Anyone who has been prosecuted of these

We are all familiar with the phrase, "A little birdie told me." But where did that birdie get his information? If he was like most Mockingbirds in the sky, his information was probably obtained through eavesdropping, which is not an ethical approach. This day and age with technology becoming more and more effective everyday it is not the birds that we have to worry about. Congress has recognized the way that technology has changed society and reacted by passing the Electronic Communication Privacy Act of 1986. There are two main Titles discussed in this act, Title I--Interception of Communications and Related Matters and Title II-- Stored Wire and Electronic Communications and

Each day, millions of Americans make online purchases and millions of dollars are spent through e-commerce. Whether it is clothes, books, videos, hotels, flights or even cars, nearly anything can be bought online. It is important for consumers to be assured of their identity protection and have peace of mind when ordering online. So when online retailers do not take the proper precautions for safeguarding their customer’s confidential information, how should they be held accountable? Does the Federal Trade Commission have the authority to reprimand companies that expose themselves to a threatening data breach? These are the principle questions that are being considered in the case of FTC v. Wyndham Worldwide Corp. This case has greatly impacted the future of e-commerce and has decided how companies will be held responsible for upholding the highest security standards and protecting consumer information. As Christians, we are called to not only look after our own interests, but also the interests of others (Phillipians 2:4, NIV). I will examine the holding of this case to determine how business managers can best steward the information of customers and employees to look after their best interests and protect them from harm.

Personal data is quickly becoming a commodity in today's high technology world. This information is used by banks, investment and brokerage companies, credit card merchants, government agencies (local, state and federal), and consumer product-based companies. Most people probably don't realize the amount of information that's shared between companies, or how often it's done. Many companies sell and share customer data to help sell products and find out what new products they should produce. Other uses include gathering information about inventory levels to help better determine what types of products are bought at which store, when and how often. This can be used for inventory and production, to make sure that the store (or

Financial institutions have always recognized the importance of safeguarding customer data. However, the impact of data compromise has increased substantially as identities have migrated from visual to digital. Scenarios like the ones mentioned above have become significant due to never-before-seen levels of regulatory fines and litigation expenses.

In the United States data privacy is not highly regulated or legislated, for instance, the Health, and Information Portability and Accountability Act of 1996 (HIPPA), the Children’s Online Privacy Protection Act of 1998 (COPPA), and the Fair and Accurate Credit Transactions Act of 2003 (FACTA) are indicators of how the United States federal laws tend to favor