Treatments of Goodwill and the Iasb Framework

The following are the required steps to identify, recognize and measure the impairment of a long-lived asset (group) to be held and used:

According the above assessment of qualitative factors for both companies, I think that the goodwill impairment test is necessary for Dynamic because Dynamic has many negative impacts. Although the Dynamic has 3% of gross profit margins over competitors, it was not enough to offset the negative impacts; I think that the goodwill impairment test is not necessary for ZD. Due to ZD shows all positive impacts improving operation condition.

vi) Goodwill- The beginning balance for Goodwill was determined by finding the difference between Total Assets and Total Liabilities at the beginning . Goodwill accounts for all the intangible assets that were transferred from the old company to the new company, including brand name, as well as a premium paid for the company. Goodwill was not amortized in this model.

If the 5-year amortization were applied in its place of the 40-year timetable, then it is necessary for Blockbuster to identify the goodwill in larger amounts. This would increase tax liability of Blockbuster, which would have represented a loss of $0.09 (0.58 - 0.49) per share

Goodwill is not amortised. Instead, goodwill is tested for impairment annually, or more frequently if events or changes in circumstances indicate that it might be impaired, and is carried at cost less accumulated impairment losses. Gains and losses on the disposal of an entity include the carrying amount of goodwill relating to the entity sold.For the purposes of impairment testing, goodwill is allocated to each of the Group 's cash-generating units (CGUs), or groups of CGUs, expected to benefit from the synergies of the business combination. CGUs (or groups of CGUs) to which goodwill has been allocated are tested for impairment annually, or more frequently if events or changes in circumstances indicate that goodwill might be impaired.If the recoverable amount of the CGU (or groups of CGUs) is less than the carrying amount of the CGU (or groups of CGUs), the impairment loss is allocated first to reduce the carrying amount of any goodwill allocated to the CGU (or groups

The following are the required steps to identify, recognize and measure the impairment of a long-lived asset (group) to be held and used:

Where explain the concept of Intangible asset, which represents assets that absence of physical substance. Moreover, Goodwill represents an asset from which is expected future economic benefits, emerge from the acquisition of other assets or business combination. Another important point would be the impartments testing as refers ASC 350-20-35-28 where indicates that Goodwill of reporting unit must be tested for impairment annually. The test can be accomplished at any time in the fiscal year. In the case of different reporting unit, the impairment test could be at different times. This citation in the memorandum was provided incorrect (ASC 305-20-35-1 and 28) this encoding does not exist in FASB.

We will discuss whether the Company’s approach for testing goodwill for impairment after recognizing an impairment charge related to a long-lived asset group classified as held-and-used is appropriate. This issue pertains to whether it is feasible to have a long-lived asset impairment without goodwill impairment.

Based on ASC 320-10-35-34 I mentioned above, the other-than-temporary impairment should be recoded as $28 ($100-$72) as of December 31, 20X1. On January 31, 20X2, when the price of the stock went up to $75, the other-than-temporary impairment should be recoded as $25 ($100-$75). If the share price was $95 instead of $75 on January 31, 20X2, I think no other-than-temporary impairment needs to be recorded, because there is no material decrease occurred.

The following are the required steps to identify, recognize and measure the impairment of a long-lived asset (group) to be held and used:

According to Section 360-10-35-21, examples of events that would cause an asset to be tested for impairment include a significant decrease in the market price of a long-lived asset, or a asset group, a significant adverse change in the extent or manner in which a long-lived asset or asset group is being used or in its physical condition, a significant adverse change in legal factors or in the business climate that could affect the value of a long-lived asset, or asset group, and a current period operating or cash flow loss combined with a history of operating or cash flow losses or a projection or forecast that demonstrates continuing losses associated with the use of a long-lived asset or asset group.

Cisco allocates the fair value of the purchase consideration of its acquisitions to the tangible assets, liabilities, and intangible assets acquired. The excess fair value of the purchase consideration over the fair values of these identifiable assets and liabilities is recorded as goodwill.

In this case of the Klax Company, it does appear that an impairment test should be performed. Since there are increase of competition and the loss of several customers that have recently gone out of business. They should be considered as the adverse changes in the business climate that can affect the value of the asset. Therefore, the plant and equipment need to be tested for impairment.

In intellectual property assets and software showed its opening balance, closing balance, additions, disposals, accumulated amortization and impairment currency translation differences and net amount. Goodwill just showed the opening and closing balance and currency translation difference not any impairment loss. However, in intangible capital work in progress, it also showed other more informationabout amount transferred to software intangibles and transferred from PPE. At the end of the notes 12 of intangible assets, it provided additional information about the amortization charge that was recognized in general and administration expenses in the statement of comprehensive income （CSL annual report 2011）and impairment tests for cash generating units containing goodwill. CSL Behring and CSL Blotheraples all were CSL’s goodwill. The total intangible assets in 2011 were lower than before because of amortization in every year.

- The excess of cost to the Parent Company of its investment in the Subsidiary over the Company’s portion of equity of the Subsidiary is recognized in the financial statement as Goodwill.