Trophie Hunting Is Cruel Research Paper

Many people consider hunting dangerous. This is not necessarily correct. Before any person is legally allowed to hunt in most states, they must undergo a required

The topic of mankind hunting in today's day and age is an interesting subject and it is one that there are many opinions on. Yet, 100 years ago hardly anyone would have had a bias against hunting. What has changed? Why are Americans split in the way they view hunters and hunting? Has our culture come to some new knowledge that has illuminated them to the wrongs of hunting? To begin to answer this question one must look at the history of hunting. Hunting has been a vital part of mans life since the beginning of their existence. For the past thousands of years mankind has depended on the harvesting of game to live. Ancient manuscripts and even cave paintings have shown that hunting played an intricate part in the life of the ancients. During those times no one questioned the correctness of hunting because it was so essential to their life and part of their nature. Around 1650 the "new world" was being colonized and people lived off the land. Deer, turkey, squirrels, rabbits, doves, and pheasants were all hunted and killed for food. In fact, without the existence

Why do people kill innocent animals for sport? Many see it as cold-blooded murder. Hunting’s popularity still persists though. In The Most Dangerous Game, the author, Richard Connell shows his negative view on hunting. Three reasons can prove this theory.

To put this on equal terms, think one day you and your family are taking a leisurely stroll down the park. While walking down the spark another person randomly tries to kill you. But, no one but your mom is wounded with a poisoned wound without an antidote. Frighten you would not be able to know or think straight with the sight of someone dear to you dying right in front of your eyes. Now if you would please take that picture and put it in terms of an animal being hunted by another species far more advanced, without a way to protect themselves. Is it really morally right to kill another living thing for sport? Especially when the animal involved is on the endangered species list, to be fair, it is on the endangered species list for a reason because it is on the verge of becoming extinct. So let me ask you again why should anybody think it's more to hunt and kill animals that are endangered or simply in our backyards. it is morally wrong to continue trophy hunting as a Leisure activity when endangered animals are

Laws are not strong enough against animal cruelty and people do not know about this problem because it is not as prominent as others. Some of the reasons humans kill animals is for food, clothing, and entertainment. The way we kill animals in doing these are very brutal and inhumane. The only thing they care about is to produce a mass amount of meat, in a short period of time, and with little food to feed the animals. The last thing they are worried about is the animal itself and its feelings and needs.

"Sport" hunting is a violent form of recreation that has left countless animals maimed, and orphaned animals vulnerable to starvation, exposure, and predation. This activity disrupts natural animal population dynamics and has contributed to the extinction of animal species all over the world, including the Tasmanian tiger and the great auk.(1,2)

In conclusion, I don’t agree with big game hunting because statistics show that non lethal nature viewing benefits more than simply killing animals for money. Not only that, but they kill the animal, only taking the parts they want and leaving the rest to rot. To kill an innocent creature for bragging rights is simple

“ Detractors warn that by-products of legal trophy hunting… animal bone,skins,teeth,etc often enter the black market”(Alex). Animals are like humans just they have different features. However, this evidence shows and talks about black market. Animals are part of nature, so are we. Killing animals and using body parts are not right. “ I completed my patient’s medical chart, laboring to put into words the complex choreography of the last hour… a life reduced in death to timestamps” (Eric). Furthermore, this evidence is important because it proofs that killing is not a justifiable act. Killing someone could affect the life of people around them. It affects and scars people’s life. Even doctors could be affected by someone’s

Hunting has been around for centuries because it was necessity to survive. But now animals are being killed and mistreated for all the wrong reasons. Our generation has developed over the years and the need to hunt for food is no longer necessary. Though in some developing countries animals are still hunted for food and religious reasons. But animal poaching is affecting number of species going extinct. Due to animal poaching which is the illegal killing, hunting and/or capturing wild animals. Everyday more and more animals are being captured and killed or sold by poachers. The animals that are being killed are being exported to other countries and being sold for their rare parts or sold for meat.Which has become a global problem that many

Cecil the lion’s death was a tragic event that caused everyone to change their perspective on hunting. When I heard about this, I thought that this wasn’t hunting but instead animal cruelty and somewhat murder. So, in this essay I will be proving my point that Cecil’s death was murder and the hunter should be punished.

absolute cruel treatment for innocent animals. Sports hunting kills hundreds of thousands of animals per year just for the satisfaction of killing an animal, and because it makes many bucks. In addition, hunted animals are shot, but sometimes the hunter may prolong the death and immense suffering of an animal. According to iddausa.org, it states, “Quick kills are rare, and many animals suffer prolonged, painful deaths when hunters severely injure but fail to kill them. Bow hunting exacerbates the problem, evidenced by dozens of scientific studies that have shown that

No doubt that Animals go through the same pain and suffer like humans, at the same time do not get the same treatment. I think killing and murdering animals is morally wrong. Therefore, we should assess the animal feelings before hunting them for food. For instance, hunting a deer that delivered a newborn, and leaving the young alone

First of all, for trophy hunting should not be allowed because rules aren’t allows followed. When Cecil the lion got lured out of the park, the lion wasn’t even supposed to be lured out nor killed. This just proves some of the people don’t follow laws and some are dirty. Another reason how people don’t follow the rules is killing animals that can still breed. Some animals are endangered

In the debate, the not to kill group first argued against both trophy hunting, and it’s methods. The team claimed that to keep the endangered African animals safe such as the lions, elephants, and Rhinos, trophy hunting must come to an end. Another problem the group mentioned was the corrupt system that handles the money, that comes out of the hunt. When the hunter kills the animal, ideally some of the money that the kill generates, goes back to the community, but because of the corrupt system, most of the money goes into the wrong hands.

Everyday thousands of animals are brutally murdered by people that participate in the recreational activity that is hunting. Hunting is an activity that involves a person attempting to kill or trap an animal. Hunting is mainly done to animals in the wildlife and often in cases are used for food, clothing, recreation or trade. In my opinion hunting is morally wrong.