True Notebook Vs Book Analysis

Comparing the book to the movie you can clearly tell what certain things are different. For example, Sydelle Pulaski worked for Mr. Westing in the movie but only talked over the intercom. This not only caused a lot of drama but more depth to the plot. Also, Crow didn’t go to jail but they did talk about most of the consequences of her going to jail. This made a little bit more serious and emotional instead of just letting it go.

Normally, when a movie is made about a story in a book the two stories are not exactly the same. The movie is adjusted by adding small details or leaving out some parts in order to make the story more

Despite having many differences the film remains faithful in capturing the novel and putting on film. While one may not get everything from the movie as from the book, the majority of it is there. So for die hard fans of the book there is no need for disappointment. All the main parts of the book are there, the characters, the plot, the setting

The perception that the novel is usually better than the movie version in this case is true; I preferred reading the novel over watching the movie. The novel

One of the hardest things for a director to do is to turn a book into a movie. There is a fine line between keeping the movie just like the book, and by barely crossing that line you can end up making a completely different vision than the book has set out for you. There are also many viewers out there that will completely hate the movie if it is nothing like the book that they read originally. The director has to realize that although there are many different types of audiences to please, that it still has to be a great movie that people cannot stop talking about.

The difference between the developing way of books and movies is magnificently huge because the way of emotion transmitting is different; the movie is based on vision, while the book is based on words.

For instance, the book talks about how the greasers felt and how their feelings were, then in the movie, it didnt talk about it but it showed it. The way that they showed it was not as good as it was written. When reading we don't fall in love with the characters' appearance. We fall in love with their words, their thoughts, and their hearts. We fall in love with their soul. In movies we focus more on appearance and what's going on in the background, which then gets people distracted from what the character is feeling and their thoughts. On the other hand, you can see the actions of the characters in the movie, which might help you process the way they act, however with the book the author can use what he thinks and try to give people a general idea of everything. For an example in the book it talks about how Randy

I feel that as a reader they could tell me how he felt compared to showing me how he felt. The actor in the movie really showed me how he felt and in the book told me how he felt. The actor in the movie really showed the emotion and determination to get home to his family again,this was shown so well to me I felt like I was in the same situation,all the horrible things that happened to him happened to me.The examples were the reason I felt the book and the movie were different.

The book tells the same story as the movie but in a different way it cuts out thing the movies has or the movies adds thing that's not in the book. The book has some not many similar but . I feel the director was unfaithful to the book.The book and movie version of Our America had many differences.

The book has many confrontations with detail telling you how things worked, while the movie showed it and some may not have noticed it. This brings you to the book that simply converges you on each detail and on each scene that you can imagine. Also, the movie has some clips out of line showing

When film producers run out of ideas, the industry turns to books as inspiration stories for their next big blockbuster. Popular examples of these adaptations include Silence of the Lambs, Harry Potter, Dracula, The Shining, and many more . As audiences that fell in love with every plot point, every character trait, basically the book entirely, we find it slightly disappointing when the movie doesn’t do much justice to the book in terms of including every detail thus leaving out the “good parts” due to time constraints and such. Another major reason that audiences tend to be disappointed upon watching a book-based film is that the characters are not all they imagined to be- meaning they think of the character one way

As with fiction, most of the significant qualities of the characters are designated in the writer’s instructions: what they say, what they do, how they react, respond, what others say about them.

Due to the text’s complexityz and the author’s peculiar writing style, it took me quite a while to get into the story, thus reducing my reading speed considerably. But, once I was one third into the book, I started to really enjoy it and, as the narrative became more and more complex, I became aware of how much the book and the movie differ.

When a person reads a book they are entranced in the plot line. They have to comprehend and understand in order to finish the book and have it make sense. Movies can just be idly watched without gaining attention or intellect. Due to this, movies do not leave an impression.

“Harry, did you put your name in the Goblet of Fire?” Dumbledore calmly asks, versus “HARRY! DID YAH PUT YAH NAME IN DA GOBLET OF FIYAH?!” (Rowling). Although this is a quote from the same story, it is interpreted very differently in the book than it is in the movie. “No two persons ever read the same book,” says critic Edmund Wilson. Books, television, and movies tend to be interpreted and relayed differently, even within the same topic. Stephen King once said, “Books and movies are like apples and oranges. They both are fruit, but taste completely different.” In a book, the author and the readers formulate many unique interpretations, but movies limit the interpretations to those of the director and the actors. Reading books allows for the use of one’s imagination, visualizing what is happening and relating the events to personal life experiences. With movies, viewers are fed the interpretation of the actors and directors. Movies are a lazier way to experience a story than books. Books are more beneficial than movies.