Trump Travel Ban Pros And Cons

A Federal Judge temporarily barred Trump’s Executive Order concerning the travel ban. This has caused extreme controversy among American’s as topics such as immigration, refugees, vetting, and religion all take tolls on the perspectives of the media as well as the average American. Nevertheless, the travel ban has been critiqued as well as praised by different groups and the Federal’s Judge’s emergency order has sparked debate on the constitutionality of the order.

Imagine that you are in an airport trying to flee your country because there is a war going on, all of a sudden you get stopped by a security officer saying that the country you are trying to go to does not allow refugees, What would you do? The debate about refugees has been around since World War Two when Hitler was trying to torture or kill all the jews and other people he did not like. Here in America we did not let refugees into the U.S. during the war and a bunch of them were killed, however some did survive. Some people think that we should let them into the United States of America well, others say they should not be allowed to enter the U.S. In the year of 2016 there was around thirty-eight thousand refugees that were allowed into the United States. There were a bunch of other refugees that applied to come to the united states but got denied, because the U.S. did not choose them or they did not pass the test to become a refugee. The idea that refugees should not be allowed into the united states because they could bring disease, they could be a criminal or a terrorist, and they use up our land and resources deserves some merit. However These arguments do not realise that if we bring them into the United States we could save their lives, or give them better living conditions. In this article I will argue that we should allow refugees into the United States, but only under certain circumstances. Those circumstances are they should be allowed into the united

The Travel Ban marks a major turning point in the policies on immigration in the United States. Due to increased terrorist attacks and illegal immigrant numbers rising, it is believed that temporarily banning immigrants from particular countries is key to ensuring safety within the United States. Though many have expressed their concern towards the ban because of its similarity to previous discriminatory and unconstitutional acts. The ban has even been referred to as the “Muslim Ban”.

Your professor schedules a class debate on pros and cons of the enforcement of federal immigration laws by the local polices. which side would you take? The local police must be involved in the enforcement of federal immigration law.

It’s summertime, and what do we do during summer? Well some us work jobs and others live it up by the pool. If you’re like me the only traveling you're doing this summer is in your dreams and the only surfing you're doing is surfing the web. Summer means many different things and for many it means attending a family reunion. Now family reunions are the best because you can eat tons of food supplied by your grandmama and aunties, kick it with your cousins, and occasionally see grow folks act up. However, some may be forced to put their plans on hold as Donald Trump's new travel ban will go into effect soon.

The newly indicted President of the United States, Donald Trump had made an executive order to create an immigrant ban to prevent immigrants from entering and returning to the United States. Shortly after signed the order there was chaos due to Trumps lack of communication; Trump had signed the order as the official's were still discussing it. To continue, when the order was set Custom border control had received orders, however, they were quite unsure of what to do, more questions continue to raise about why trump had singed this order and why he was so quick to fulfill it. Officials of the Whitehouse had defended Trump's decision for the order and his reasoning for it.

Furthermore, the article shows an efficient use of the logos. The authors try to persuade the readers as much as possible about the new executive order that the president recently approved using primary sources such as people coming from these countries and also from people working in the government, like the press secretary of the White House. ¨In the hours after the executive order was signed, border officials detained or turned away anyone who was born in or hold a passport from one of the seven countries, even those who also had citizenship in countries other than the targeted seven. ¨ This evidence is particularly effective for this rhetorical situation. The author is using the information and the primary source as efficiently as possible.

However, since President Trump was elected, the Bureau of Prisons has restored those contracts and ICE is proposing five new private detention centers -- in Detroit, Chicago, St. Paul, Salt Lake City, and south Texas.

The Immigration Reform blog is supported by FAIR – Federation for American Immigration Reform, with gets about eighty percent of its funding via grants from private foundations. An extract (from FAIR’s website www.fairus.org) gives part of its mission statement as “FAIR seeks to reduce overall immigration to a level that is more manageable and which more closely reflects past policy.” Robert Law in his article "9th Circuit Upholds Block of Travel Freeze, Jeopardizing National Security” on the immigration Reform blog, refers to the judgment of the appellate court that upheld the temporary restraining order that blocks the Trump administration from implementing its temporary travel freeze as such as “judicial activism.” This tone appears to be

This article is about President Barack Obama being rejected trying to spare millions of undocumented immigrants from deportation and allow them to work legally in the United States.The Supreme court ruled 4 to 4which tied blocked president Obama's plan. Even though the were short handed due to the death of the 9th member Justice Antonin Scalia died in February. Court ruled had ruled this case deadlocked which challenged president Obama Immigration plan to stop as many as five million undocumented immigrants from being deported and allowed them to legally work in the United States. "Mr. Obama described the ruling as a deep disappointment for immigrants who would not be able to emerge from the threat of deportation for at least the balance

In the following article, Adam Liptak and Michael D. Shear, discuss how the Supreme Court of the United States had tied on a case about President Obama’s Immigration Plan. This article gives a glimpse of how the judicial branch is a very important factor of the United States Government. This article reflects how the power of the judicial branch because it shows how the Supreme Court has a special role to play in the United States system of government. The Constitution gives it the power to check, if necessary, the actions of the President and Congress. In the following article it displays how the Supreme Court can tell a President that his actions are not allowed by the Constitution. This article discusses the fact that their are many illegal

Trump versus Hawaii was first brought upon the supreme court on September 24, 2017; however, it was first brought into a federal court on January 27, 2017. President, Donald Trump, signed a travel ban that deferred the entrance of immigrants, legal or illegal, from six foreign countries. In December of 2015, during Mr. President’s campaigning, he delivered the statement “a total and complete shutdown of Muslims entering the United States”. This proclamation foreshadowed the future of this travel ban and what it would entail. The travel ban now being set in place was the third attempt Donald Trump has made at getting an approval for a ban. Nevertheless it goes against what our Constitution has outlined for America, the morality of our people,

I believe that banning Muslims from the United States is a bad idea and horrible one as well. Muslims shouldn't be kicked out just because Donald Trump believes it will help the country. Muslims should be able to come to the United States with people thinking they are bad and just want to blow stuff up. There are good and bad Muslims like every other type of group out there. The Muslims are being singled out from their religion and this is unconstitutional because it breaks the First Amendment of the Constitution that gurantees freedom of religion (Reuters, 2015). This will also make the situation in todays world worse since they are trying to radify Islam (Reuters, 2015). Donald Trumps thinks he is doing the right thing, but he is not. America

collectively valued at $168 billion. These immigrant founded firms are continuously creating jobs for America, yet the laws are beginning to make that more difficult.

In my opinion based on the whole Trump travel ban, I think that it is wrong to ban a certain religion. I mean as of now, they changed the travel ban about so many times and now it is only letting people in United States if they have close family members, but i feel like it will not work. There are many people coming here to the United States and have the dream to live here and have a better life for their family but the government's just barring them from entering here. And now they're trying to eliminate legal immigration for new people trying to enter here and it could create more chaos which 2 senators are trying to create. How would you know a person's religion when they check at the airport? That is just wrong towards that type of people