Trump 's Relationship With The American Public

A man walks into a bar and begins to converse with a local—the man is not from the area. Intrigued by the unfamiliar face, the first thing the local asks is: “where are you from?” Instead of asking for the travelers name, he seeks to identify a larger organization. These simple conversations display the tendency for humans to associate with groups. Democrat or Republican, lower, middle, or upper-class, family, education, ancestry, these communal affiliations are what define an individual. Governments are run by a community of people, and those that are not often collapse, as displayed by many failed dictatorships and monarchies. Even the most intimate component of a human, the mind, is divided into a community of different selves, as explored in the article “First Person Plural” by Paul Bloom. As demonstrated by Edna Pontellier in The Awakening, the rule of one body or persona is neither permanent nor healthy, regardless of the setting; true success comes from a conglomerate of distinct perspectives with a mutual goal in both a governmental and personal setting.

After listening to the panel of professors speak at the SCAD Keynote Event, "Explaining the Trump Phenomenon: Interdisciplinary Perspectives", I learned a variety of perspectives on Donald Trump’s presidential campaign. These perspectives were on different topics, including how he gained his supporters, his economic policies and other policies, what could happen if he becomes president, and much more. First, Trump’s popularity was definitely a surprise to a lot of people. Many of the panelists believe that he gained his supporters by shining light on some of our nation and government’s hidden problems. So he ultimately used fear to gain voters. One professor showed a poll showing that an overwhelming majority of people voting for Trump

Trump’s reaction to protestors have been throwing them out, encouraging violence, and calling names. A video compiled together by NowThis shows the contrast of Obama’s reaction where he tells the security that the protestors could stay and asked the protestors to listen to his side. One protestor disrupted Obama’s speech about immigrants where he explained his decision to deport undocumented immigrants. The protestor was an immigrant activist who chanted, “stop deportations”. Obama responded with, “I heard you. Now I’ve been respectful. I let you holler. Nobody’s removing

The 2016 presidential election revealed how politically diverse the United States is and it also revealed the inequalities of colored people and the working class. Furthermore, Donald Trump’s victory embodied white male supremacy and the interest of the wealthy. Thus, UCSB students started to correlate Trumps victory with flaws in American democracy. Despite the notion that college students are indifferent to politics, in the contemporary moment UCSB students have a critical view on the state of American democracy in the United States that is mainly shaped by the 2016 Presidential election and Donald Trump’s controversial conservative ideologies.

The year is 2020, President Trump’s presidency is coming to an end, but it cannot come sooner to the American people. Trumps years in the Oval Office would have been great if not for his sudden decision to initiate the removal of immigrants during his last months as President. Every major city in the United States is swarming with Immigration and Custom Enforcement agents. Immigrants are being taken right out of the workplace, rounded up, handcuffed and sent back to their home country. As the immigrant population disseminates, hundreds of local businesses across the nation go bankrupt. Boarded up store fronts are now the norm. With the dramatic decrease in the immigrant population almost no one is willing to invest in the infrastructure of towns with low socio-economic statuses. Farms are being left no crop pickers, in a few weeks there will be a shortage of produce across the United States. As people begin to ration, the economy continues to plummet. Every day the immigrant population decreases and everyday more businesses close, more food goes bad because of the lack of crop pickers, and more people begin to realize the importance of the immigrant population. This could soon be our reality, if immigration is not dealt with properly and in accordance with current information.

This article is about the presidential nominee Donald Trump, the writer talks about the nominee's view about certain races and religions and his formal life as a billionaire, corporate owner and reality tv star

In the article “In a time of tragedy, could Trump soothe the nation?,” Michael Gerson argues that the strange new tactics being practiced by the president is in no way soothing the nation. Gerson supports this argument by focusing on Donald Trump’s communication style, and its lack of professional characteristics. Through the article, Gerson hopes to inform Americans with his alarmed and condemned tone that there could possibly be trouble concerning the nation’s state of peace. The author establishes his relationship with the audience, American citizens, by trying to build his ethos. He does this by mentioning the fact that he is a speech writer.

However, this growing distrust and resentment the Populists often fell victim to gives rise to an ethnoreligious nationalism where this resentment fuels into violence within the country. Figures such as Donald Trump appeal to the “plain people” because he exemplifies the resentment and contempt aspect of Populism by dwelling on the threats posed by “outsiders”. He establishes his rhetoric on the basis of a hierarchy existing in the country and that certain groups who are true American should reap the rewards that have been denied to them. He claims to be the mouthpiece for the common man who has been ignored by the government and deserve to be heard. Throughout the American rhetoric, Populism echoes the Lockean liberal thought of liberal thought of the social contract, the emphasis on the Republic for the common person, and the patriotism stemming from Providentialism and Ascriptive Americanism.

Hillary Clinton, Ted Cruz, Bernie Sanders; all renowned names due to the US presidential race, but by far the most controversial name involved in the race is Donald Trump. This republican candidate has been discussed and debated over due to what many call radical views. Throughout the race, Trump has become famous for his boisterous comments and remains the leading presidential candidate.

It had a supernatural effect for blacks everywhere knowing their president was in their corner and drove the point home even further for the activists knowing they were fighting for a supported cause."That could’ve been my son," were the words that had everyone release breathes unknowingly being held. In insufficient, all this would seem to allude to, until there was a murky Presidency it was impossible to think of the limitations of one. They held a devise and garble a Thanksgiving luncheon. The current Presidential campaign has presented the movement with a crucial opportunity to address that question. Last summer, at the annual Netroots Nation conference of progressive activists, in Phoenix, Martin O’Malley made his candidacy a slightly longer shot when he responded to a comment about Black Lives Matter by asserting that all lives matter—an evasion of the specificity of black concerns, which elicited a chorus of boos. At the same event, activists interrupted Bernie Sanders. The Sanders campaign made overtures to the movement following the incident, but three weeks later, on the eve of the first anniversary of Michael Brown’s death, two protesters identifying themselves as Black Lives Matter activists—Marissa Johnson and Mara Willaford—disrupted a Sanders rally in Seattle, preventing the Senator from addressing several thousand people who had gathered to hear him. The women were booed by the largely white crowd, but the dissent wasn’t limited to whites. This was the kind of freestyle disruption that caused even some African-Americans to wonder how the movement was choosing its targets. At the time, it did seem odd to have gone after Sanders twice, given that he is the most progressive candidate in the race, and that none of the Republican candidates had been disrupted

Donald Trump pulled one of the greatest upsets in the history of American politics. The aftermath of his election was a country divided on political and racial basis. However, it is racial and anti-immigrant sentiments among white supremacists that characterized the first half of Trump’s era. In August, 2017, a race-fueled chaos rocked Charlottesville, Virginia and when the violence stopped, the millions of Americans who watched them on TV engaged in their rituals: arguing amongst themselves on what happened, who were behind the chaos, and the purpose.

As American citizens, it is our obligation to set up a future for the next generation.We have not achieved this goal yet. Right now America is divided.

The Trump Effect: The Impact of the Presidential Campaign on Our Nation’s School. Southern Poverty Law Center. 2016.

In this paper, I outline Noel and Judis and display how they are in disagreement as to the ideologically coherent nature of Trump’s supporters and his campaign. The ideology of the candidate, their campaign, and the ideology of their supporters are not mutually exclusive. Donald Trump could be ideologically incoherent as a person, which I am not arguing, but his campaign and supporters that drove him to get elected were ideologically coherent. In this paper, I argue that Donald Trump’s campaign and his [Middle American Radical] supporters are ideologically coherent under the mantra of an anti-establishment ideology.

Campaigning is very important for politicians seeking office because Politicians need to be known all throughout the country to win a public office. One very important aspect of Campaigning is attack ads. While campaigning a politician will place attack adds to sway the voters opinion of other candidates, doing so to get more votes. Some videos show a more compelling side of which candidate to vote for.