Trump's Impact On The Environment

The United States Environmental Protection Agency or EPA was initially proposed in 1970 by then President Richard Nixon. The agency was created to build on other environmental regulations enacted by the federal government and to consolidate those efforts to be managed by one government agency. It was also a reaction to the public’s growing concern over pollution and other environmental issues. Chemical waste was commonly released into bodies of water creating unsafe drinking water and rivers catching fire. Industrial air pollution, such as acid rain and smog, was also affecting manufacturing cities with coal-powered plants. There was little serious regulation on pollution until major environment laws started being passed by Congress in the early sixties.

The political climate at this time, and remains, turbulent. Donald Trump was elected president of the United States, and his campaign was built upon making America great again. The long and short of this idea is that 20th century industry was suffering in our 21st century world, and Trump would deregulate the government and promote industry. One of Trump’s most pivotal decisions, despite growing international movements to prioritize climate change, was to select Scott Pruitt as the 14th administrator of the Environmental Protection Agency. The timing of “Scott Pruitt And The Environment” was likely to diffuse any center-right concerns that the current administration was marching towards far-right ideologies; in other words, Epstein sought to console Hoover Institute readership.

The inception of U.S. Environmental policy most notably began under the Presidency of Richard Nixon; Nixon oversaw the passage of the Clean Air Act, Clean Water Act and the creation of the Environmental Policy Act (EPA). The Clean Water Act of 1972, in particular, enacted stringent laws to prevent pollutants from entering navigable waters, outlawing open sewers from dumping crud into a local stream and the law also protects land that filters and purifies water as it flows by. The Landmark law passed in 1972, however, has not impeded the pending water crisis facing the U.S. today. The United States must take immediate measures in order to combat the problem; given that the U.S. Office of the Director of National Intelligence now ranks water scarcity as a major threat to national security; right next to Terrorism (Sullivan). The United States should reform the Clean Water Act of 1972 to look for any deficiencies in the law.

Pruitt, after his nomination, said that he will work to protect the environment and remove excess regulations that hurt the

McCarthy accomplished plentiful, as she encouraged new rules for cleaner fuels and cars, and desired to cut carbon pollution from existing power plants, (EPA, 2017). This makes logical sense given her background and desire to make a change in air pollution. "On February 17, 2017, the United States Senate confirmed Scott Pruitt as the 14th Administrator of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency [under President Donald Trump]," (EPA, 2017). Pruitt is a controversial administrator. According to CBS news, "Pruitt has embarked on record-setting rollbacks," (2017). Many individuals view this poorly because he is changing concepts that are incredibly important in environmental safety. In conclusion, the history of the EPA expresses how much the agency has achieved in a whole.

I agree with Dr.Clark’s statement that states he “wonders how certain government officials sleep at night”. I have my share of government officials who I dislike, and the fact that some of them had done things in the past and are still in office surprise me to this day. It’s time we hold certain officials to the same laws that ordinary citizens live by (except the president). Additionally, during our lecture Dr. Clark had mentioned that the new Supreme Court Justice believes that the EPA can’t make regulations by themselves, which hampers the power of the agency

In the 1970’s there was growing confusion regarding environmental policy due to certain states creating environmental protection laws which were largely ineffective. To ease confusion, fix national guidelines, and monitor and enforce them President Richard Nixon created the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). The EPA functions under three federal departments: the Interior, Agriculture, and Health, Education and Welfare departments. The original role of the EPA was to administrate the Clean Air Act which was enacted to reduce the air pollution caused by vehicles and industry. The EPA has since grown to enforce at least 12 major statutes such as: ocean dumping laws, safe drinking water, insecticides, and asbestos hazards in

It’s titled White House to EPA: Don’t Believe Everything You Hear. The Senior White House Advisor chipped in on this one, he said, “One thing I am certain of is that the transition team is committed to working with you to carry out the core mission of the EPA -- to protect human health and the environment. ”This is a good point but I think if they were worried about the health of the citizens they would have done something about it sooner. Don Benton says, “Much of what we see on the news is not accurate.” This is believable in some circumstances, it is very hard to lie or bend the truth in some situations though. “Changes are coming, he said, promising to work with the EPA to implement them,” says Benton. This was believable for a minute until I realized it’s 2017 and it still hasn’t been changed

Since President Trump’s appointment of the new head of the US Environmental Protection Agency, American citizens have felt safe and secure knowing that a well-versed environmentalist is watching over the degradation of their planet. Scott Pruitt, the new head, is the most qualified republican lawyer that deserves this job. His past attempts to repeatedly sue the EPA, his anti-environmental protection stance, and his alliance with gas and oil companies make Pruitt an ideal candidate for this position. As the new EPA chief, Pruitt is already making clean, green decisions to ensure the safety and protection of the earth.

In their platform they stated, no further measures are needed in the issue of air pollution (Republican Party, 2016). The Republican Party belief is that the environment is improving year by year, and that air pollution will decline due to technological turnover of aging equipment (Republican Party, 2016). Trump, however has a similar mindset compared to his party. Trump supports clean water and air, however the funding of the Environmental Protection Agency, needs to be lowered. Over the years pollution has decreased, therefore, funding the organization shouldn’t be expensive. Nitrogen dioxide pollution, averaged yearly from 2005-2011, has decreased across the United States Air pollution has decreased even though population and the number of cars on the roads have increased (Nasa, 2014). The decrease in the air pollutant, nitrogen dioxide is a result of regulations, technology improvements, and economic changes involving cars/. As it is stated they will not focus their attention on this important STEM

In the United States, These past few years have been rocky with the Environmental Protection Agency otherwise known as the EPA. The “rockiness” stems from multiple factors, particularly surrounding around President Donald Trump’s bias towards business over the protection of the environment.

I agree. Over the next four years we will have to take environmental protection into our own hands, especially mitigating climate change. There have already been reports that the climate change webpage on Whitehouse.gov has been taken down and replaced with the Trump Administration’s “America First” energy plan.

The amazing thing that the article mentions is how the EPA’s regional administrator has not tried to blame someone else for the accident or hide from the issue, the administrator Shaun McGrath has stepped forward and taken responsibility for the disaster (Kinkaid, 2015). While Shaun has been described as being one of the good guys at the EPA, administrator Gina McCarthy has been described as the complete opposite. She appeared to try and avoid the issue and did not even admit there was a problem publicly until six days after the spill. The writer of this article also thinks that McCarthy is an ideologue who is out to regulate companies in the United States out of existence (Kinkaid,

Food safety and assistance is a big problem in the United States. The government has many different programs to help the needy and keep the food regulated. The FDA and USDA have different programs and acts to help protect the people that buy the food products. There are tons of ways that food can be contaminated through the production process; for example, cross contamination. The Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program provides the assistance for low income families or individuals to purchase the nutritious food they need and the Hunger-Free Kids Act is a government run program that helps get kids the nutritious lunches they need at school to keep them full throughout the day. Two, of the many food safety regulations are the Food Safety

Lately, The Minister of Environment is making it easier for companies to pollute by planning to exterminate an Obama rule that forces companies to reduce their pollutant emissions over the next couple of decades.This would be like a general psychiatrist advising Americans to start smoking many packs of cigarettes a week, and this is definitely not OK for the air, looking at our current global climate change; however, there is something we can do about it. The EPA is receiving comments about their decision and I encourage you to send him an email by overwhelming them with the consequences of their decision! Tell Trump and Pruitt how you