Trump's Rhetoric Of Making America Great Again

With our country’s focus on the strengthening of military weapons and protection programs against foreign enemies,

During one of Trump’s speeches in January, the American president strongly affirmed advocation to the “America first” foreign policy (Calamur). In other words, the president is focusing its foreign policy based on its national interest— strengthening America's economic prosperity, standing against inequitable trade practices, and building strong alliances with economically thriving partners—and national security. To eliminate ISIS and other radical Islamic terror groups, the Trump Administration is not only cooperating with international partners to “engage in cyberwarfare...and disable propaganda and recruiting”, but also “rebuilding the American military” (“America First Foreign Policy”). Trump believes that terrorist groups have been using the internet as their key recruitment tool and thus, his administration will be cutting off militant propaganda on the internet. Additionally, the president is trying to reverse the trend of the United States Navy (USN) since the Navy shrunk from over 500 ships to 275 from 1991 to 2016 (“Beckwith”). Considering the fact that the United States is militarily strong, the Trump Administration is acting based on its national interest through involvement in cyberwarfare and an increase in military power.

It is the most expensive in American history. In the long run spending this money will pay off. America cannot sacrifice their military to save money. The contract for this project was very important to make sure the best company got the bid. Having the contract out there also made it easier to keep the cost down due to companies competing for it. Whether this a good idea considering the nation’s debt is still up for questioning, but this will defiantly help the nation weapons system. Sometimes you have to spend extra money that in the long will pay off. Even though this is the most expensive project in American history, it also can be one of the best projects in American

9/11 changed all that. At a time when the nation was in turmoil, the government immediately began to raise the military budget. The Budget rose by 5% in 2005 for the invasion of Iraq and again to 5.7% in 2011 for the stepped up efforts in Afghanistan. With this inflation of funds allotted to the Department of Defense, it opened up more funding for projects that were not able to acquire funding in the past. As the money was shoveled into these technologically advancing projects, as with many projects, failure happened regularly; causing a large portion of the newly acquired budget to be squandered. Just a few years ago in 2011 Defense Secretary Robert M. Dates made this statement to

For years, it was widely believed that the next World War would be centered on the use of nuclear weaponry. However, the development of viruses has furthered cyberwarfare, and in recent years the attention has shifted from a nuclear threat to a cyber one. Having the ability to completely, dismantle another country’s entire infrastructure without leaving your desk is clearly much simpler than using nuclear weapons. “The treat of a cyberattack is a clear and present danger to America and is more likely than a nuclear attack.” (The Hill) Even higher ranking defense officials are realizing that the focus must shift to cyberwar, instead of the traditional nuclear missiles. Additionally, the cost for cyberwarfare is significantly less than the cost of nuclear

Chapter 18 – The U.S. has the largest defense budget in the entire world – do you think this is necessary or unnecessary? Explain and defend your answer.

All US services utilize airpower to sustain the three pillars of the 2014 QDR : protect the homeland; build security globally; and project power and win decisively. There are many ways the services provide airpower support, but this paper only touched on one for each pillar. For the protection of the homeland, cyber security was the way that was shown. A current example of the importance of cyber security is the Office of Personnel Management (OPM) data breach. This breach allowed the theft of personal information, including but not limited to social security numbers, belonging to millions of Federal employees, their spouses, and others. For the pillar of building global security, the support of our allies and partners was the method

The way of reconsidering our defense budget ought to start with recognition that the financial catastrophe and collapse that started in 2007 has changed the context in which, every federal rule should be evaluated. In the area of national security, it is a development as significant as the end of the Cold War and the happenings of 11 September 2001. For the reason that it, and the wider unstable course of globalization that transmit and enlarged it, stand seriously on the preservation of the American national power. Looking back just two or three decades from now, America's economic power and authority is less certain these days than just four years back as is the outlook of our greatest national security asset, our very powerful national security tool: the US dollar.

When a third party gains access to information not intended for them, turmoil follows shortly after, such as during the Cold War when Russia received nuclear secrets. As technologically evolved, society welcomed new threats globally. Consequently, the U.S. finds itself surrounded by plausible risks of cyber attacks, such as hazards to the economy and infrastructure of this nation (). Economically, cyber threats pose a global shut down because of how intertwined the largest economies are, so if America’s economy collapses, other nations such as China would seriously suffer as a result. For example of how costly cyber attacks can be, the Love Bug virus costs computer users billions of dollars annually even though the virus lacks the use of expensive, high-tech equipment (). The infrastructure of the U.S. receives no less of a threat from cyber attacks. Repetition of any attacks poses the largest threat to the national security through infrastructure, military campaigns display this theory. A single battle does not determine the overall outcome of a war, much like cyber attacks. One attack does pose a potential risk, but the risk increases as the number of attacks increases. An array of threats wait for organization and execution, yet America’s preparations for such threats lacks in nearly all areas. Barack Obama placed steps to increase the nation’s cyber security, but the steps cannot prevent a full-scale cyber war, which leaves America at risk (). Many breaches of security exist where a third party gained access to secret information with undisclosed intentions, such as state-sponsored hacks by China on the

These days, with tensions in precarious positions between other countries, America’s defense has needed large booster.

The U.S. rarely spends money on unnecessary weaponry, normally the profits are towards UAVs and specialized drones. Within these spending efforts the U.S. no longer faces an opposable threat from enemy countries. This allows the military to stay within the shadows while locating our threats. Utilizing the so called “element of surprise” while seizing, capturing, and or eliminating the threat. Instead of spending hundreds of billions of dollars to maintain the current size of the armed forces and buy unneeded weapons, the United States should invest in better intelligence gathering, unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs), special operations forces, and language skills”(Pena 41).

Based on current sources available, we have medium confidence that China will continue to conduct cyber espionage against United States defenses and military systems. It is not a new development as China’s People’s Liberation Army (PLA) cyber team has been behind many attacks against US defense firms and military systems as early as 2007. The KIQ for this assessment is: How vulnerable our Military and Defense sectors systems to cyber-attacks? It is imperative to US National Security, because outside actors, like the PLA, are exploiting our defense and military systems that can disrupt future operations both domestic and abroad. After a short background on China we will address the fallowing: Their motives, methods, targets, and challenges we face to combat Chinese cyber warfare.

While ISIS and other terroristic groups are and will remain at the head of the United State’s government’s concerns, as technology continues to advance, cyber security should also become more prevalent to the government. Because of technological progressions, I believe that in the future, war will no longer be most commonly fought with physical combat. Nations will instead fight behind computer screen, breaching one

As the spectrum of cyber has grown, the ability to exert influence in this emerging dimension provides broadened capabilities due to cyberspace?s low barriers to entry and fluid nature.[footnoteRef:3] Cyber incidents can thus range between a basic denial of service attack (where a network is overloaded with requests and shuts down)[footnoteRef:4] to operations of much greater severity. Increased state capacity to use offensive cyber resources is evidenced by official publications such as the 2015 Department of Defense Cyber Strategy.[footnoteRef:5] This includes measures up to the level of offensive cyberattacks on enemy systems and networks. The increased sophistication of offensive cyber weaponry means that the implications of its usage will have to bear further scrutiny. This challenge is only exacerbated by emerging capabilities available to non-State actors and their ability to exploit cyber resources to their advantage in asymmetric conflict. [3: Singer, P.W., & Allan Friedman,

In the 21st century, humans continue to advance technology at an incredibly fast rate, which also indicates we become more dependent of the technology. Keep in mind, with more technology being available, new threats emerge constantly in the cyber-world. Everyday society seems to be integrating digitally more and more, meaning the US 's infrastructure may be susceptible to attacks. Little is known about America 's Cyber Security defenses, if any money or such has been invested in improving our defense, so that we may have sufficient protection against such attacks. It is critical that the government and private sectors (if any) will come in a joint effort to ensure the security of our nation 's infrastructure and not be susceptible to any attacks on the digital frontier.