Truth And Realism : The Same Coin And Have A Synchronistic Relationship

When discussing reality, several questions emerge regarding what reality is. A reality, "the real situation that exist," (Merriam-Webster.com) consists of two forms-perceived reality and actual reality. One spends his or her entire life trying to decipher the difference between the two forms; yet to truly understand reality, it is essential that you comprehend both. Plato 's "Allegory of the Cave," Dick Gregory 's "Shame" and Frederick Douglass ' "Learning to Read and Write" illustrate examples of both perceptions. Furthermore, how conceptualization of reality helps establish who one will become.

“I want to say that the noumenal Real is experienced and thought by different human mentalities, forming and formed by different religious traditions.”

To think philosophically, the reality of living does not really has a definition. Around the 1840s, specific groups of people known as transcendentalists argued that there’s an intensive connection among God, man, and nature. They emphasizes that the main truth of understanding reality in life should be an individual epiphany. Christopher Johnson McCandless from Into the Wild shared similar philosophical ideas as two notable transcendentalists known as Ralph Waldo Emerson and Henry David Thoreau, and lived life like a transcendentalist based on his behaviors and life values.

Have you ever questioned the nature of your reality? Questioned if you are completely able to see from the outside looking in? Philosopher Plato, presents his view of reality through an allegory to explain the concept, and how we gain knowledge of our reality. Two other philosophers that I will mention both touch base with their description of reality and how it relates to Plato’s conception. All three of these philosophers believe knowledge is attainable through acts of realization and simple knowledge, and each philosopher presents his/her main point of reality through different ways of attaining it. I will further mention the relevance of Plato’s theory in today’s world and why I believe it to be valuable.

Many questions may come to mind when one seeks to understand life and mankind presence. What can I possibly find out? What is real or facts? Are we able to determine reality? For one to answer these question would be quite challenging. However, the matrix, Plato’s The Allegory of Cave, and Discartes’ “Meditation I” shares their understanding of how one can determine reality.

Realism pertains to the belief and writing style a higher power controls the people. The religious side of O Pioneers! showed this. “It was no fault of theirs that they

The denotative definition of reality is “the world or the state of things as they actually exist, as opposed to an idealistic or notional idea of them”. The only problem with this is, who exactly determines the correct reality? What is the control for everyone to base their lives around? The simple definitions for these not so simple words leave something to be desired, as the world as we know it can’t be declared invalid simply because one’s views don’t coincide with those deemed as a “control”.

Historically, humanity has been obsessed with discovering the nature of reality. Every person eventually develops their own worldview based on their beliefs, morals, and experiences. At one point in their lives, many people undergo a radical change in perception that forces them to change this view, eventually adopting a new perception of reality. Such a transformation occurs once one starts to question the fundamental nature of one’s own existence and that of the world around them. This realization begins with the disillusionment with one’s environment, continues with the questioning of one’s life’s worth, and concludes with the acceptance of a new worldview.

The concept of sacred reality, “We recognize a notion of sacred reality wherever a group of people describes a particular phenomenon as a manifestation of the real in terms that indicate something (1) specially distinctive or “set apart” from everything else in the world, (2) to some extent, beyond the volitional control of human beings, (3) specially prominent with respect to human welfare, and (4) properly determinative of various aspects of human existence. In what follows, we illustrate each of these characteristics of sacred reality.” (Cunningham,

reality to those within. The movie Inception takes an interesting twist on this idea of a false

This seems to make some sense – reality should be the unadulterated experience. Once a person has time to think over and analyze an experience, and thereby

In metaphysics the idea that reality is created by the observer and therefore created by the experience of our world as stated by Deepak Chopra, I do not agree with. If I did I would believe that I could create my own reality therefore basically acting if I believe it then it is so. I would make experiences that would make the world what I wanted it to be. I would manipulate the happening and the people around me to make reality what I wanted it to be. I would be selfish and not consider anything or anyone else that is involved. I would never consider any one else’s opinion or beliefs and only my own, basically living as if my reality is correct. If you could live in this shell then life would be wonderful and completely what you wanted it

In order to embark upon a discussion of moderate metaphysical realism, it is first pertinent to delineate the term and distinguish it from the opposing position.

Since the Scientific Revolution, humanity has adhered to a supposedly reasonable rationalist philosophy—characterized by a preference for reasoning over experience—which inevitably accompanies impersonal fields such as the sciences. Although science avoids preternatural speculation on principle, quantum theory’s implications alter the fundamental way in which we understand what is at a quantum level, and such a revelation transcends any reifications participated by preceding generations. Fortunately, English philosopher Owen Barfield’s Saving the Appearances transcends temporal reality, bridging 1965 and 2015, while his novel serves as a template through which we begin to comprehend the potential of consciousness as reality’s impetus and how, by way of individual consciousness, we act to create reality. Keeping this in mind, New Age philosophers such as physician Deepak Chopra advocate that consciousness precedes matter’s presence in the chronology of reality. Similarly, social scientist Willis Harman and, by extension, biologist Rupert Sheldrake, adopt a radical hypothesis: human consciousness creates reality. Present iconoclastic theories suggest human consciousness creates reality and also hypothesize our ability to manipulate the abstract—such as time and bodily systems—in order to prolong life or increase health. Through conscious awareness, we parse how consciousness creates reality; this awareness thusly enables us to better scrutinize reality and examine which

Every philosopher seems to be more concerned with constitutes reality than any other factor. When different ones were discussing the law, mathematics, science they were still trying to nail down reality to their satisfaction and determine what it is and whether it truly exists the way people have always believe that it does. Descartes for example was a noted mathematician who is still studied to this day. All three snippets are looking at whether reality, actual reality, is better than some perception, and again if there truly is a separate reality.