Question 3: Truth and Reconciliation Commission of Canada The Truth and Reconciliation Commission of Canada was established under the assumption that the Indian Residential Schools were an assimilation attempt on the First Nation population. This commission led to the compensation of over $6 billion for those who went to one of these school. Unlike the Truth and Reconciliation Commission of other nations, the Canadian one was not meant to be a transitional justice because there was no shift from authoritarian to democratic rule. It was strictly the outcome of litigation. Furthermore, the Truth and Reconciliation Commission of Canada was not approved to press charges on individuals for acts they were accused of, nor name individuals unless they …show more content…
The Canadian government never transitioned from an authoritarian government, and instead maintained itself as a democracy from before the Residential Schools began till modern day society. With this knowledge, it is clear why there was no attempt to find the facts about the state’s transgression and how they played a part in the internationally recognized conflict – because it did not only implicate the old government but the current one as well. Truth and Reconciliation Commissions assume that conflict arose from an authoritarian government and that a democratic one would not cause nationwide tragedies like that of the Canadian Residential Schools. As a whole, the general ideas of Truth and Reconciliation Commissions are inaccurate when dealing with a western power such as Canada, they hold a favorable democratic bias thus not taking into consideration that there was no shift in the style of
I figured it was appropriate that the author did not place the blame on one party. Instead, he addressed the various individuals in Canada that were not providing a fair education in its national and political history as well as for the reasons why this is such a big deal. This book was educational as it gave readers brief and sometimes precise examples, like how Canadians lack national and political conscience within the academic curriculum. The Country’s educational system needs to do a better job training its educators and ultimately restructuring curriculums to deal with our current problems. The book's exterior appearance is bright red, and often red, is associated with power. I believe that this book has the authority to make readers think about their experience concerning Canadian history - but unfortunately, a majority of the population does not know enough of its history to learn from the mistakes and successes of our predecessors. Along with the strengths of this book (argumentative perspective, educational, and exterior appearance), there were a few weaknesses as well. To elaborate on Granasteins effort, I believe he wrote from an androcentric perspective. There were times when he sounded like a grumpy old historian man. I think his little rants reduced the effectiveness of the book. He made many prejudice remarks concerning multiculturalism and social history (gender studies, urban, economics, demographics, etc.). Since history is an accumulation of time periods and each period varies in length, and the intensity of the events, it might be tough to establish the nation's needs for clear, measurable standards for history. There is only so much information that an individual’s brain can retain for a period before they start losing
While watching the beginning of this film where Stephen Harper stated at the 2009 G20 Convention in Pittsburg, PA that Canada had no colonial history, I reflected on the apology he made in 2008. I was surprised he made this statement in the film as his government was also the first government to acknowledge the horrendous consequences that the Indian residential school system had on the Indigenous community. Through his apology, he recognized how this inexcusable aggressive assimilation policy developed by the Canadian government stripped the Indigenous community of their culture, heritage, and their language. He also added that residential schools have contributed to social problems faced by many Indigenous communities today. With this apology,
Canada has formally apologised on multiple occasions for past federal actions yet the governments following action show their lack of being apologetic. The claims the Federal government has made, induce Aboriginals to believe that change will come, yet nothing follows. Stephen Harper and Justin Trudeau have both given large speeches to try to reconcile the past, but do not follow up with any meaningful actions. For example, Trudeau promised millions of dollars in funding for the National Centre for Truth and Reconciliation yet that money has yet to be seen. The government is continuing to make claims to subside the riots but has yet to follow through with any of their dues. Each speech is done to please the public so the government can continue to ignore their responsibilities. Overall, the statement of reconciliation has tried to mend ties with Aboriginal peoples yet it can be seen as a cover blanket to try and hide the government's difficult
With the passage of the British North American Act in the 1867 and the implementation of the Indian Act in 1876, the “government was required to provide Indigenous youth with an education to integrate them into Canadian society” (Brady 1995). The first residential schools were set up in the 1880s and peaked around the 1920s. After the residential school system was established, children were stripped away from their parents and had no freedom to choose whether they wanted to attend. In these schools heavily controlled by catholic churches, children were forced to pray to whom they had no connection with and forbidden to practice their own culture. The goal was to “convert the children to Christianity and
When the term “genocide” is used, the majority of people will immediately call to memory one of a few widely recognized instances where this atrocity was committed. The Holocaust, Rwanda, Darfur or Armenia are among the most well known, but are they the only instances where genocide has occurred? Surely not, but this is indicative of a problem we are faced with today. Since the term “genocide” was coined, countries are very wary of admitting to any acts of wrongdoing in their history which may fit that definition. Canada is not exempt from this thinking, and because of this we must ask, has Canada ever committed acts of Genocide? This paper will look at one relatively recent example that can be used to answer “yes” to this question; the residential school system. Canada’s Indian Residential School (IRS) system and it’s treatment of Indigenous children was not just dark and brutal, but in fact constituted a “genocide” as defined by the 1948 UN Convention on Genocide.
“Laying there, with someone walking toward you, you can tell what time it is,” he said. “You know what’s going to happen. A fellow doing something to you, fondling you, all hours of the night.” Jacks also remembers a time when two girls tried to escape the school. The school was on a island, so the girls got a boat but they ended up drowning before they could escape. At the school he also recalls the nuns telling him that he was stupid and that he would never be anything. The Canadian government was quite about these allegations of abuse but has paid out $350 million dollars in settlements to victims of sexual assault in residential schools. (Tim Naumetz, The Global Mail) The many cases of sexual assault has been blamed on the Canadian government for not properly screening teachers. Some of the teachers were pedofiles that saw these schools as a gold mine. Though the Canadian government states that they were just trying to modernize the population, some evidence proves otherwise. The main goal of residential schools was to eliminate the savages. The first prime minister of Canada John A. Macdonald spoke on this in the house of commons in 1883. “When the school is on the reserve the child lives with its parents, who are savages, he is surrounded by savages, and though he may learn to read and write his habits and training and mode of thought are Indian, he is simply a savage that can read and write.” This quote
“Where are they taking me, mom?! Help!” These were the screams of an Aboriginal child when he was dragged to a car that drove him away from his family. Aboriginal kids were forcefully abducted and placed at poorly built and equipped residential schools. Residential schools are a network of boarding schools for Indigenous peoples. Like a disease, these schools spread so fast on Canadian land. They were every Indigenous child’s nightmare. Kids who attended were traumatized due to the mental, physical, and sexual abuse they suffered. Canadians felt superior to Aboriginals which lead them to use their power excessively to civilize these communities. This issue is considered to be one of the darkest chapters in Canadian history. It has a significant impact on Aboriginal communities. Indians suffered a loss of culture and identity. This issue violates various human rights such as; Freedom of language, freedom of culture and religion, freedom of choice, and the freedom of safety and health. The two groups in this controversy are the aggressors; Canadian government, and it’s churches, and the victims; the aboriginals. The question is, is the Canadian government doing enough to make it up to those who suffered the ill effects of residential schools?
In Canadian history, there are a lot of interesting events happened in the past. Some of them are events that are proudly presented such as Battle of Vimy Ridge, Canadian peace keeper and others. On the other hand, there are also a lot of tragedy events that happened in the past. Indian Act is one of an important act which occurred in 1876 and it led to establishment of Indian residential school, and the Indian residential school is a tragedy event that happened in Canada. It was the school that most of First Nation people will never forget. What was the reason? What did the residential school do with those First Nation people?
Canada is presently known for welcoming many racial groups into the country. However, the Canadian government is not always giving out warm welcomes to different ethnicities. During World War Two, the country rejects many Japanese and Italians who are already Canadian. The treatment of the Japanese and Italians in the Second World War is very unjust. The two groups face being put into internment camps against their own will, the government separates families and force men to work on farms with little pay. The government of Canada also mistreat the Japanese and Italian Canadians because they are full of fear and superstition.
Canada today is known for the pride it carries for being multi-cultural, inclusive and combination of many cultural, races and religious backgrounds, but for decades in the past Aboriginal children were abducted from their homes unwillingly to go to these Residential School enforced by Canadian government and laws. The goal of the government at the time was to destroy Aboriginal people and their existence overall. Fast forward in 2008 the former Prime Minister Stephen Harper made a public apology to Aboriginals regarding their role in residential schools as he quotes “We are sorry. The treatment of children in Indian residential school is a sad chapter of our history” ("Prime Minister Stephen Harper's Statement Of Apology"). Although many Aboriginals considered this a historical day and had a sense of relief “the apology was necessary but insufficient... Apologies once given, are only meaningful for the action that follows” ("Harper Apologizes For Residential School Abuse"). The official apology to Aboriginal Canadians who suffered in the residential school system for policies and actions of the government in the past have been explored in “A Sorry State” article by author Mitch Miyagawa. Sitting government apologizes for past government is appropriate to the mistreatment that occurred to interned, excluded and systematically neglected people, the accountability for past mass atrocity and human rights abuse and democracy for the victims, as well as acknowledging what
Residential schools were the one of the worst decisions the Canadian government had made. As they planned this idea with the churches across Canada, it became unforgettable for the native people. These schools changed the way native people lived in Canada. The children in these schools were abused and neglected everyday
The residential school system in Canada was to give a disciplined based idea that encouraged aboriginal culture to be in favor of European people. The children at the age six were taken away from their parents to be sexually, physically and mentally abused, which were the teaching strategies in Residential schools. Church organizations ran the Residential schools and by doing this, they were receiving money from government. Churches were given money by per Aboriginal child, so they were taking away as many Aboriginal children as possible. These schools were located in every province in all over Canada from 1860-1884 and churches were promoting their religious and cultural beliefs. However, the torture that many young aboriginal experienced in the residential schools showed the difference between the European society and The Aboriginal society.
To what extent was Pierre Trudeau’s vision of a “just society” actually achieved in Canada in (and since) the 1970s? Canada is a just society because of the changes to women's legal rights, ethnic minority human rights, and multiculturalism.
Aboriginal persons in Canada have been facing oppression ever since colonization began. Even when Canada gained independence from the British Empire, the oppression continued and still goes on today. One major contributing factor to the oppression of Aboriginal people in Canada is the actions taken by the Government. The Government of Canada has in fact mistreated and found to be partaking in wrongdoing when dealing with the Aboriginal population in this country. With this ugly truth being revealed, the Truth and Reconciliation Commission had to be tasked with discovering and revealing past wrongdoing by a government in the hope of resolving conflict left over from the past. (cite)
As a nation, Canada is known to the rest of the world for being thoughtful, polite, and generally very accepting of all ethnicities and people. However, the treatment of Canada’s Indigenous population, Japanese Canadians, African American and Indigenous slaves seems to suggest otherwise. Canada's dark past may not be talked about often, but there are three main events that targeted specific ethnic groups which still affect those people today. Residential Schools led to major negative cultural consequences, as well as psychological and sociological effects. Japanese-Canadian Internment Camps were used to strip Japanese Canadians of their rights because of the World War II bombing of Pearl Harbor. And finally, for two centuries slavery was legal in New France, and in Lower Canada under British rule. Human beings were being held captive and were owned by many people, including governors, bishops, military officers, priests, and blacksmiths. All of these terrible consequences can be accredited to Canada’s imperialistic policies.