Tsar Nicholas 2 Research Paper

In 1917 the Russian revolution had began, this was the biggest factor in the fall of the Romanov dynasty. The white Russians arrested the tsarist and abdicated him from his throne putting Nicholas and his family on house arrest and he was no longer known as the Tsar, replacing him with a Bolshevik government. The red Russians had captured Nicholas and his family causing a civil war between the white and red Russians. In July 1918 Lenin and his red Russian squad had won the civil war, and shot Nicholas and his family, leaving Russia a communist country until the 1990’s.

Nicholas II was known, not only for being the Emperor of Russia but also for his character and personality which undoubtably led him to his own downfall. Nicholas was often referred to as not being ready to become Tsar as well as being a weak leader. Firstly, Nicholas II himself, amongst a very large proportion of Russian society, believed that he was not prepared to be coronated Emperor. Nicholas himself stated “What is going to happen to me and all of Russia? I am not prepared to be a Tsar. I never wanted to become one. I know nothing of the business of ruling.”. (Russian Revolution Quotations 2015). Nicholas was aware of what he was getting himself into and that he was not prepared for such a role. This is further corroborated by the

In 1905 and 1917 Russia was tormented by chaotic revolutions. The workers and the intelligentsia had arrived at the point of hating the autocracy because they could no longer endure the suffering, hunger and repression that the tsarist policies brought with them. Years later Lenin referred to the revolution of 1905 as a “dress rehearsal for the October Revolution” of 1917. In 1905 tsardom nearly fell. Nicholas II succeeded in remaining in power, stabilizing the situation, only thanks to various concessions. However, his continuing to rule harshly and unwisely brought him to be forced to abdicate in the February of 1917, signing the end of the Russian monarchy.

During the 1900’s the Russian Government made it extremely hard for the Bolsheviks to progress which made them revolt against the government making this a prime matter for the start of the Revolution. The Czarist government was ostracized by the common people of Russia so Tsar Nicholas II was overthrown by the Provisional Government, whom later on were overthrown by Lenin and shortly after the Bolsheviks took control over Russia. Russia was hard to develop because of the major leaders who had control; Lenin, Stalin, Trotsky. Almost overnight an entire society was destroyed and replaced with one of the most radical social experiments ever seen. Poverty, crime, privileged and class-divisions were to be eliminated, a new era of socialism

The fall of the Romanovs can be put down to a number of factors, one of them being the influence Tsarina Alexandra had on Tsar Nicholas II. Due to her close relationship with the Tsar she was able to influence and manipulate him in a number of ways and convinced him to hold on to his autocratic power no matter what. As a result of her intervention she can be seen as a significant figure in the fall of the autocratic system. Her significance can be measured by a number of factors such as her relationship with the Tsar and the influence she had over him, her relationship with the Russian people as a result of her German roots, and finally her relationship with the monk Rasputin and the influence he had over both the Tsarina and the Tsar.

How far were divisions amongst opponents responsible for the survival of Tsarist rule, 1881 - 1905?

In Russia a czar has the same the power as an Emperor of the U.K. In Russia there has had many different types of czars.There were good czars and also many, many bad czars, but by far the most interesting is Ivan The Terrible.

The State Dumas were an elected legislative body that were to serve as a lower parliament. They were started by Tsar Nicholas II under the October Manifesto, a document written after the increasing pressure of the 1905 Revolution, this document promised more civil liberties, and the introduction of a duma, under the influence of Sergei Witte, the chief minister. The four dumas ran between April 1906 and February 1917 and Nicholas II opposed a duma from the start, and most decisions came to the Tsar and his council. Even though not much came of the dumas, they were still important and a change in the way how Russia was run.

Ivan IV also mainly known as Ivan the Terrible was a famous Russian born monarch that used the name czar as a title of his reign. He granted a lot of power in 1543 by killing a Shuisky member and letting his family known as Glinsky, have more power in the Russian government. In January of 1547 he gained full power and a few months after, Moscow caught fire and killed more than 1,700 people making many protests go against the Glinsky family making Ivan IV wanting an emergency reform (sauers.) He was very famous for his statebuilding and reforms of the Russian empire during the Modern Era because it was needed to save Ivan’s leadership profession. Statebuilding was important during this time because it would make in this case Russia more controlled

What were you doing when you were 15? Probably going to class every day, learning about the same old stuff. What would you have done if you were crowned the first Czar in all of Russia when you were that young? Certainly, most people would’ve gone a wee bit crazy. But Ivan the Terrible, he went completely bonkers.

“I stand here today to inform you of my motives and rationale that pushed me to become the leader that I am today after Tsar Nicholas the second abdicated, giving Russia the chance to start fresh. I was elated by the news of the abdication of Tsar Nicholas. I strongly believe this is the best thing for Russia and I would not have had it any other way.”

The Russian Revolution of 1917 set the country on a course that few other countries took in the 20th century. The shift from the direction of a democratic, parliamentary-style government to a one party communist rule was a drastic change that many did not and could not predict. Looking back on this key moment in Russian history, many historians ask the question ‘why did the political power in Russia shift to the Bolsheviks’? Since the revolution in 1905 Russia was becoming progressively more democratic, distributing power throughout the political sphere. This came to an abrupt halt when Vladimir Lenin was put into power by the Bolshevik takeover of the Provisional Government. Many authors have had different takes on this event. Two particularly interesting ones were Arthur Mendel and John D. Basil. Their pieces On Interpreting the Fate of Imperial Russia and Russia and the Bolshevik Revolution give various perspectives on the Russian Revolution and attempt to answer the question of the power shift. This key point in Russia’s history sets the tone for the next 100 years. Russia became a superpower, an enemy of the United States, started multiple wars directly and indirectly, and started using an economic system used by various countries around the world. Today we still see the effects of the 1917 Revolution. Looking at both Mendel’s and Basil’s attempt to answer why the power shifted to the Bolsheviks. Since both historian 's account of the events is different they cannot

It is clear that a lot of people did not want to put up with the constant down spiralling because of the autocracy, many people decided to rise against the situation. These people were split between the reformers and a smaller group of revolutionaries. The reformers, or Liberals, wanted to modernise Russia gradually.They wanted free elections, more education for the people and no censorship. The revolutionaries, on the other hand, wanted to throw out the whole tsarist system and build a different one.Revolutionaries were the ones waiting for the perfect moment to strike the match since the autocratic regime had caused a long term fatigue in the society - the long term situation let them was highly in favour of this group in terms of revolution, only a slight push to the angered people was needed to proceed.

There were many different equally important reasons why Lenin and the Bolsheviks were able to hold on to their power. For Lenin, and the Bolsheviks, winning political power was relatively easy, compared with retaining it. They had many different objects to overcome, such as; Russia was in chaos, politically and economically, and normal government had broken down in large areas, yet despite all these problems Lenin was able to consolidate his power – and create the world’s first communist state.

Tsar After 1905 It would be true to say that the Tsar remained unscathed after 1905, as he remained on the throne until 1917. However, it would also be true to say that the Tsar was permanently damaged by the 1905 revolution. Before 1905, there was much unrest and discontent. Famines in 1897, 1898 and 1901, made the already struggling countryside even worse, and the usually loyal peasantry held uprisings in two provinces in 1902. The Russo-Japanese war caused further unrest following a series of defeats, including that of Port Arthur.