Tuckman Model

Tuckman in his "Stages of Development' model identified 5 stages of team formation: forming, storming, norming, performing and adjourning (CIPP, Unit 1). Based on his analysis and characteristics of each stage it becomes possible to recognise that the team has reached the stage of 'Performing'. According to Tuckman it is the final stage of development when a team is fully functioning and produces its 'best work'. The main features of the ‘Performing’ stage are (CIPP, Unit

The Tuckman 4 stages all have to do with a group trying to work on a project together or maybe even playing a sport. Each stage can be seen in a part of everyone’s daily life whether they are at school, home, on the field, and or in movies. The most common stages are forming and storming.

Tuckman (1965) suggests that understanding is required in order for teams to reach maturity. Tuckman phases of team development are:

Tuckman's theory focuses on the way in which a team tackles a task from the initial formation of the team through to the completion of the project. Tuckman's theory is particularly relevant to team building challenges as the phases are relevant to the completion of any task undertaken by a team but also the development of a team in the grander scheme.

Tuckman (1965) proposed that when developing teams, groups proceed through four general stages of development, namely: Forming, storming, norming and performing.

Tuckman and Jensen model focuses on the development of internal relations among the team members. There are 5 stages, Forming, Storming, Norming, Performing and Adjourning.

The Tuckman’s stages of team development (Levi, 2007) will be used as lens to evaluate the work of the group presentation. The Tuckman’s stages of team development consist of five stages of forming, storming, norming, performing and adjourning (Levi, 2007). In the forming stage we tend to know each other and figure out how we are going to run the presentation. At this stage, there was discomfort due to unfamiliarity together with confusion on how we will function together. The solution for that case was, everyone had each member contact detail, had a clear ground rules, as well as planned how we will accomplish our tasks. In addition, we also experienced the storming and norming stage. Levi (2007) says that the in the storming phase there are often

Tuckmans stages of group interaction is a 4 stage process involving forming, storming, norming and performing.

Bruce W Tuckman (1965) developed a model to describe the differing stages of team development. He gave us a way of interpreting the various stages groups pass through into making an effective team. As you can see from the illustration below, teams go

Tuckman’s theory is significant as he recognizes that groups do not always start of fully formed and functioning. He states that groups develop through different stages through the process of whatever task they fulfill (Smith, M. K. (2005). An example of Tuckman’s theory consisted of team development and behavior of the U.S navy. Tuckman’s model suggests that teams grow through four stages; Forming, storming, norming and performing, as teams develop maturity, ability and relationships within their groups (Team Building, 2017). Relating Tuckman’s theory to the activities, we were required to design a castle.

The five stage Tuckman’s theory (1965) namely forming, storming, norming, performing and adjourning focuses on the way in which a group handles a task from the beginning to completion. The main group work approaches are cognitive behaviourist, feminist, psychoanalytic and humanistic approaches. Knowledge of theory enhances effectiveness of group work.

dealing with conflict but if you become aware of the five alternatives it will lead to greater success. This mode can be used as a training program for staff. Good for self- examination and for personal development.

The Adjourning Stage of Bruce Tuckman’s five stage model was added most recently. While this stage has no impact on teamwork, it is important to the well-being of individuals. Following the accomplishment of the teams goal team leaders will review lessons learned during this stage. Awards may be given or ceremonies are held to recognize the work of team members. This stage has also been called the Deforming Stage or Mourning Stage, as the team separates and a close knit team might feel a sense of loss (Williams and Curtis, 2007).

This balance is often observed difficult to achieve, especially within the solution teams. This is mainly attributed to the team formation stages as described by the Bruce Tuckman’s model (1965). According to Tuckman, the team formation goes through the forming, storming, norming and performing stages in progression. In the forming stage, there is a high dependence on leader for guidance and direction. In the storming stage, team members vie for position as they attempt to

Work Team development is a dynamic and often difficult process. Most teams find themselves in a continuos state of change and development. Eventhough, most teams never reach full stability, there is a general pattern that describes how most teams evolve. There are five stages of team development, the first stage is forming. In this stage there is a great deal of uncertainty about the teams purpose, structure and leadership. Members are testing the the waters to determine what types of behaviors are acceptable. This stage is complete when members began to think of themselves as part of the team. The second stage is called storming. In this stage there is much intragroup conflict.Team members accept the existence of the team, but there is resistance to the control that the team imposes on individuality. Conflict can arise from numerous sources within the team setting but generally falls into three categories:communication, factors, structural factors and personal factors (Varney, 1989/Townsley). In addition, there is conflict over who will control the team.