Turn Taking Research Paper

The findings of E.E. Evans-Pritchard serve as an example of the importance of ethnographic fieldwork and cultural relativism. People have an inherent tendency to drift towards ethnocentrism if they do not keep an open mind about the legitimacy of foreign cultural ideas. Enculturalization occurs from the very beginning of one’s life. When one grows up in a culture that praises traits that are deemed as beneficial and discourages behaviors that are seen as harmful, one tends to develop similar beliefs on these traits and behaviors. Different cultures encourage different outlooks on society. This is the result of the environment a culture exists in. In many tribal societies, one of the primary influences on culture is the physical environment. However, in technologically-advanced societies that worry less about satisfying needs and more about fulfilling desires, social aspects are perhaps more significant. For example, note the difference between American and Japanese culture. American culture promotes individualism and free speech. Many Americans tote the Constitution and the Bill of Rights

Ruth Benedict’s anthropological book, Patterns of Culture explores the dualism of culture and personality. Benedict studies different cultures such as the Zuni tribe and the Dobu Indians. Each culture she finds is so different and distinctive in relation to the norm of our society. Each difference is what makes it unique. Benedict compares the likenesses of culture and individuality, “A culture, like an individual, is a more or less consistent pattern of thought or action” (46), but note, they are not the same by use of the word, “like.” Benedict is saying that figuratively, cultures are like personalities. Culture and individuality are intertwined and dependent upon each other for survival.

Individuals of the same ethnic background share the same culture a factor that explains that there, as many cultures as there are ethnic backgrounds across the world. Globalization has, however, led to interaction of people from varied cultural backgrounds. Because of the interaction, globalization has been accused of limiting cultural diversity. It is, however, not the case in reality. The purpose of this paper is to analyze some of the factors that justify that globalization has not limited cultural diversity as its critics say. Thus, globalization should not be viewed as a hindrance to cultural diversity because the best subject of moral concern should be the individual person and not the nation, community or the society.

Globalization is a concept that has become a common dinner table topic in today’s society; however, the meaning of globalization and its definition are often times confusing to someone who is unfamiliar with the topic. Therefore, to first understand globalization is to understand how it is defined; globalization is considered to be a process of interaction and integration between the people, the companies, and the government of different nations that is driven by international trade and investment, and also aided by information technology. Based on this definition, it is easy to see how globalization can have an effect on the environment, culture, political systems, economic development, prosperity, and on human physical well being in societies around the world. Therefore, because globalization can have such a profound effect on a society and the well being of its people, then the idea of globalization being considered a structural violence can also be hinted when looking at the bigger picture. Structural violence is a concept coined by sociologist Paul Farmer; according to Farmer, “structural violence is the natural expression of a political and economical order that seems old as slavery, it is a social web of exploitation in its many differing historical forms and has long been global” (Lechner & Boli, 2015, pg. 155). Therefore, Farmer explains that this form of violence is a vicious cycle that can occur in globalization because it is on such a large scale and various

Since the terrorist attacks of September 11th, 2001, immigration control and national homeland security have been issues of concern for both the national government and private citizens. In the wake of the attacks, a lot of articles were written about what the appropriate response should be to prevent another attack. In 2004, Mark Krikorian wrote an article for the Providence Journal entitled “Safety through Immigration Control” in which he contends that the only means to keep America safe from a follow-up attack is to strengthen and enforce immigration law to prevent terrorists from being able to enter the country. Edwidge Danticat, writing for The Nation in 2005, provides a juxtaposition to Krikorian’s stance in her essay “Not Your Homeland”, in which she describes her witnessing of the inhumane conditions many immigrants are forced to endure in the name of increased security to protect the country. She questions whether the added protections are worth the human cost we are paying by treating immigrants and refugees as guilty until proven innocent. At the crossroads of these two perspectives lies the question: what is the proper balance between national security and the humane treatment of immigrants?

Theories of globalization present a more difficult task for Beyer, as he must not only establish what globalization is, but religion’s place within it. He explores the problem in various ways through the rest of the first part of the book. Beyer rests his analysis upon the work of Luhmann primarily, but also that of Immanuel Wallerstein, John Meyer, and Roland Robertson. Using Luhmann, Beyer resolves the theoretical debate of whether globalization is a homogenization of all particularities under a common social rubric or a simpler transformation of

“Globalization has had a profound impact on culture, largely through the existence of very powerful world information and communications system (Baker 66) leading to ethnocentrism not only on the global scale but also locally. This causes the unequal treatment of individuals of different races, ethnicities and cultural backgrounds, labeling

As a result of the 2001 September 11th attacks, a series of catastrophic, heartbreaking incidents which claimed the innocent, helpless lives of approximately 3,000 individuals, the implementation of increased foreign affair regulation, and more stringent guidelines related to the admission and monitoring of legal immigrants, highlights the profound effect induced upon the controversial issue of immigration in response to these drastic terrorism events, a pivotal moment redefining the perception of immigration held by individuals in the United States. In fact, in consequence to the attacks, the United States government supported the implementation and ratification of the Homeland Security Act, a submission validated by President Bush which facilitated

This paper will focus on the similarities and differences in cultures and how it relates to human resilience, struggles and faith. The purpose of this paper is to highlight the effects that culture, race, and class have on human behaviors and beliefs. The cross culture countries of analysis will be Guyana and Portugal which are situated at two opposite ends of the world. One major difference is Guyana, which is located in South America and Portugal in Southwestern Europe. Which makes this comparison even more compelling? With worlds so distant, one might expect to have fewer similarities. But as I began to categorize the similarities and difference on chart exhibit A, I was pleasantly surprised with the commonalities. First I developed a chart and compare the similarities and differences, which are listed above.

Globalization is the process through which the world is slowly but surely getting interconnected. The relation is as a result of the exchange of cultural

A distinctive characteristic of human beings is their ability to inhabit a culturally organised environment. Relationships

In chapter 1, the text was about the twentieth-century world and the four themes play a role in this world. The four themes show that history is not just facts after facts, but also all connected through the themes. Global interrelatedness is the international connection between groups and the pattern of this type of connection has evolved over the years; into globalization. Identity and difference; formation of identity that is key to understanding the politics of the twentieth century and world history in general, but also distinct ones make some an outcast of society. The rise of the mass society has brought forth mass changes in industrialization, globalization, and changes in political ideas; both good and bad. Technology vs nature, humans have been

Globalization has allowed people all over the world to connect with others and share their views freely. Volf claims that although it may seem that the emergence of globalization has been beneficial to religion, religion was actually the harbinger of globalization. “Globalization was first a reality in the religious imagination before it became an economic and political project. In sum, world religions are the original globalizers ––culture-shaping forces with distinctive accounts of what they deem to be universal human values–– and are major roots of contemporary globalization” (Volf

An important part of a societies culture is the way in which humans interact with one another, whether it is a romantic relationship, friendships and familial

Cultural individuality and distinctiveness is the pride of every nation. All communities rejoice in the richness and exoticness of their own cultural symbols, be it dressing, architecture, language or way-of-life. With the dawn of globalization, however, cultural variety and distinguishing characteristics are vanishing; giving rise to a monoculture common to all. While this may be a harbinger of unity and relatedness among all people of the world, it also damages the unique cultural identities they once took pride in. This paper discusses the effects of globalization on culture, along with its positive and negative effects. Since the effects of globalization on culture are non-exhaustive, it is attempted to incorporate a few of the most