Twenty-Sixth Amendment Research Paper

Ratified December 15, 1791, the bill of rights was added to the U.S. Constitution as a way to ensure the protection of every individual’s rights. The bill itself is a list of rights which limits the power of the federal government and gives power back to the people in the form of rights and liberties. Some of this rights include freedom of speech, religion, and press, but perhaps the one right that still to this day has many people questioning the meaning behind its wording is the Second Amendment. The Second Amendment states that “a well-regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed” (Acosta, 2008). In short the amendment grants the right to bear arms,

“All men are equal” Thomas Jefferson wrote in the declaration of independance. The 24th amendment later fulfilled that all men are equal by prohibiting the federal and state governments from imposing poll taxes before a citizen can participate in a federal election. This meant that some states charged a tax to vote. This was thought to keep poor and black people from voting. This amendment made it illegal to charge a tax, or any other kind of charge to vote.It was proposed by the Congress on August 27, 1962. Then later it was ratified by the states on January 23, 1964.

The American constitution recognizes the right to keep arms for defense of person and property as a privilege or immunity that cannot be abridged by the states. The Glucksberg test recognizes the right to keep arms for defense of person and property as a privilege or immunity that cannot be abridged by the states. The 2nd Amendment is unnecessary for applying this right to the states through the Privileges or Immunities Clause. 1: The Right to keep and Bear Arms in Defense of Person and Property Is Deeply Rooted in our Nation’s History and Tradition. Glucksberg Step 2: Describing the Right to Keep and Bear Arms in Defense of Person and Property. Knowing we have the right to own guns is important to those who stand with the 2nd Amendment. If owing a gun makes you feel

When our country was founded, only property-owning White men were granted the right to vote. After the Civil War, when slavery was finally abolished, the Constitution’s Fifteenth Amendment prohibited “the denial of the right to vote based on race, color, or previous condition of servitude.” Only in the last century did the Nineteenth Amendment give women the right to vote. And a little over 40 years ago, the Twenty-sixth Amendment was ratified to expand the franchise by lowering the voting age from 21 to

I enjoyed your PowerPoint presentation on the 26th amendment, which effectively changed a portion of the 14th amendment that allowed citizens who were twenty-one years old to vote. “The debate of lowering the voting age from 21 to 18 began during World War 2, and intensified during the Vietnam War” when men were being forced to go off to war, even though they could not vote, to support or disapprove of American foreign policies (Histroy.com). In my opinion, this was a justifiable reason to lower the voting age, and American’s supported, and ultimately agreed by passing the 26th amendment into law. It’s my belief, that voting age was not an attempt to exclude men from voting, but was a larger argument of at what age did a juvenile become and

I personally don't have much political experience because my parents don't vote. Therefore I don't really care much about voting. If kids aren't exposed to politics or informed on why they should vote then I don't believe decreasing the voting age will make much of a difference. If 18-year-olds do not have a high number of votes I don't see how kids younger than that would make a difference. I don't believe lowering the age is solution to increases voters. I think we should focus more on teaching the importance of voting and why it makes a difference so that when they do turn 18 they will understand why they should vote and by understanding that I believe they will be more likely to

In my opinion, I feel as though the voting age should stay at 18 and not be changed to 21. One of the reasons why the voting age should stay at 18 is because regardless of your age everyone's voice and opinion should be heard and everyone deserves an opportunity to be able to vote. Also if the voting age were to be increased to 21, the participation rate for voting would decrease significantly. Everybody says how important it is to vote so why should 18,19 and 20-year-olds not be included? If the voting age was raised, it would make things worse, and it wouldn't be right for them to not take part in voting for our political future. Many people may underestimate the younger age groups and may not see them as mature enough to take part in voting.

responded by forming committees in the House and Senate to study and debate the issue.

The Sixth Amendment of the Bill of Rights contains seven clauses that protect the rights of the accused. The amendment assures the accused that “In all criminal prosecutions, the accused shall enjoy the right to a speedy and public trial, by an impartial jury of the state and district wherein the crime shall have been committed, which district shall have been previously ascertained by law, and to be informed of the nature and cause of the accusation; to be confronted with the witnesses against him; to have compulsory process for obtaining witnesses in

In the United States the voting age currently is 18 years old and now there are those that wish to lower the age to 16. If the goal is to increase the percentage of the pouplation voting there are better ways of doing so rather than lowering the voting age two years. Doing so would only be waste of time, energy, and resources.

“Throughout history, arguments against increasing the franchise have always been dubious and they still are – no matter the group. If you think young people are too naive or uneducated to vote, then ask yourself how would you feel about receiving a test before you could vote. No matter the test, many adults would fail. There are also adults that lack maturity or can be easily manipulated. The argument that certain groups of people lack the knowledge or maturity to vote has been used against increasing voting rights to people who don’t own land, servants, and women since the 17th century”(NYRA). Another reason why people believe kids should not have the right to vote until 18 or higher is because it is shown that people don’t develop their hot cognitive abilities fully until they are about 22. Hot cognitives are the ability to choose right decisions when angered, emotionally aroused, in groups, or in a hurry. With peer pressure from others it is hard to choose what you due to your undeveloped hot cognitives as a young

The age to vote should remain 18 simply because this is the age when maturity and the comprhension skills needed are developed. Voters at the age of 16 would not participate in the way those in support of the age reduction believe. This age is far too young and would only prove to worsen our country as a whole. In order to correctly vote one must analyze each party's ideals and appeals and decide if they are beneficial.

. I personally don't feel the legal voting age should be changed in any way. When an individual turns eighteen they are able to make an informed decision. If the age was to be lowered, I feel the younger voters would be influenced by their parent or other authorative figures the individual looks up to. However, it is shown in "Keeping the Voting Age at 18", that younger voters tend to be less involved in voting. Which shows that if the age was to be lowered, it more than likely wouldn't affect the outcome of the vote. However, if the age was to be lowered, that would create more room for misinformed votes. Which in the long run would affect the outcome of the campaign. I also feel that to vote, one must understand the intentions of the person

We should maintain the required age to vote at 18, because young people do not get out and vote. In 2012, only 38% 18 - 24 year olds even voted, lowering the voting age down to 16 would only bring our participation percentage even further down. Having a 16 year old vote also raises a lot of questions rather their votes were influenced by older people or just who their friends are going to vote for. I think we should maintain our voting age at 18 because older people are more likely to pay attention to politics and understand what they will need from a candidate.

I am going to start out by saying that the voting age should be changed to 21 years old instead of 18 years of age for a couple of reasons, My first reason is the simple fact that most you adults between the ages of 18 and 20 do not have firsthand experience on what impact the person they are voting for will have for this country. Most of these young adults will still be in school and they don't possess the maturity to make such decision. The second reason on why I think the voting age should be changed to 21 is that the human brain is not fully developed until your mid-twenties since a lot of young adults are living with their parents at this age their opinion is often persuaded by their parent's political views.