preview

Twin Oaks Hospital Case Study

Decent Essays

Twin Oaks Hospital in Lexington, Colorado is a 100-bed hospital with a staff of 350 employees that include over 200 nurses and 40 clerical and secretarial employees, the majority of which are women. Recently the staff has had some apprehension and discontent over pay levels. Lexington Memorial Hospital, a public facility near to Twin Oaks recently agreed to demands from their nursing and clerical staff to increase wages five percent. They further agreed to introduce a job evaluation program which would evaluate the nursing and secretarial jobs based on comparable worth and that results of the study would be utilized as the basis for any future pay adjustments. As a result of this the staff at Twin Oaks has come to demand similar wage …show more content…

If I were the director of Twin Oaks Hospital I would recommend to create a specialized committee as Janet suggested, and create a program that was unique to Twin Oaks Hospital. I feel that a comparable worth program could help the hospital find problems that didn’t realize existed. In turn this would allow them to take steps to correct them. Wages would not necessarily need to change if two separate jobs were found comparable in value. Each issue could be further examined and then determined if the wage gap was a result of discrimination or market factors. Based on the findings a decision could then be reached. Without a comparable worth program, the hospital would simply be guessing and wouldn’t have a foundation to determine if gaps existed to due external market factors or gender discrimination.

This may seem from a Human Resource Management perspective as a costly and time-consuming process. As first and foremost, every job would have to be identified, evaluated and documented.
Next, representatives from each functional area would have to determine the weights for all factors related to the job, such as knowledge, experience, accountability, and judgement. Then, a comparison of all the jobs and weights would have to be reviewed by management to determine if the system was fair and acceptable. Prior to implementation, the system would have to be explained to employees. Lastly, follow-ups would likely have to be held with employees who received a cut

Get Access