Two Tier Health Care

In tutorial #5 we were put into groups and debated the pros and cons of Canada having a two tier healthcare system. Two tier healthcare is where the government provides healthcare for its citizens and people also have the option of using private companies to receive their medical care. Single tier health care is where the government alone can provide healthcare for its citizens and no private firms may provide health care. Currently Canada is one of the few countries in world which only operates under a government run universal healthcare.

The payment system in the healthcare industry has appealed to specialty care providers, they make a higher income than the primary care physician. The physicians are attracted to specialty care, and the individual feels that specialty care is better. If physicians were all paid well, in order to pay for their education and then continued quality training, we would not be confronting the lack of primary care doctors who are available to treat the general needs of the population (Fisher, 2013). Just as the physicians seem to be treated differently in our health system so are the patients. Using a multi-tiered system of health care where some insurance gives out a higher payment to physicians, some patients seem to be wanted while others are less well received, this leads to an “everyone for himself or herself ethic” within our medical system (JAMA, September).” The design of the system is flawed in reference to the primary care physician and with the patient who has insurance which pays less, the way to reorient both is to make the pay scale more competitive for both. The primary care physician should be able to make money and cover this educational expenses and the patient should have insurance that will equate to

The dysfunction of the American health care system implies that not everyone has access to the right medication and medical treatment. Middle-class families and chronically ill patients do not always have access to health care, and when they do they do not receive adequate treatment with regards to hospitalization and medical services or quality of service. The lack of payment reform results in

It is commonly believed that the method of physician remunerations affects their professional behavior. As a result, payment systems are therefore manipulated in attempts to achieve policy objectives with the primary aim to improve quality of care, contain cost and maintain recruitment of human resources in underserved areas. (2,1)

Most of the social class groups in America are treated differently in of services at Hospitals and Clinics. The term “social class” is a group of individuals that shares common features from an economic, behavioral view and ideological representation of the world around them. In the New York Times article, Life at the Top in America Isn 't Just Better, It 's Longer, Janny Scott highlights patients who experienced heart attacks and how they were treated at different medical clinics. Scott evaluates the upper class, middle class and working class and how it impact in people’s health and emergency care. Scott specifically points out the types of treatments and medications were given by doctors to patients. In the book, Framing Class: Media Representations of Wealth and Poverty in America, Diana Kendall describe about how the upper class portrays middle class people based attitudes and judgments between ideological characteristics. The term “admiration framing” are the interests that upper and wealth class help raise good cause on medical treatments towards other social class. Kendall quotes “journalists and television writers hold elites and their material possessions in greater awe…” (3-4). Kendall explains that the upper class people can be generous and help the working and middle class by helping towards their conditions of life. The working and middle class people don’t have the type of health opportunities as the upper class people do which impacts their lives. Diana

This diagnoses of the flaws in our health care system must start with identifying and redefining the social constructs of America. In most other civilized nations, it is generally accepted that it is in the best interest of the public that every individual be

T.R. Reid uses cost, quality, and choice to fully evaluate healthcare systems all around the world. As an American citizen, I have always thought our system was unfair. The poor suffer more than the rich for going to see a doctor for the same reason. In chapter one of The healing of America, T.R. Reid comments on how many Americans have also started to notice that the American healthcare system is not as great as we once thought. Not only is it unfair, but it is also expensive and unsuccessful (9). By looking at all the other countries’ healthcare systems, Reid would then be able to better pinpoint how America can better its health care system by taking portions of those health systems.

As a growing number of Americans find themselves without health insurance, it is demanded that the United States explore innovative policies aimed at extending coverage. The high cost of expanding coverage raises many questions about how best to improve access while preserving individual choice and maintaining quality of care. Differing viewpoints among policymakers, insurers, doctors, hospital administrators, employers, public health advocates, and health policy researchers provide a complete picture of the current and desired state of American healthcare.

The U.S. healthcare has been dealing with disparities for centuries. These disparities can be racial, social, or economical. The disparities are easier to see when compared to other reference points, such as policies, procedure or protocol. Williams & Torrens, 2008 list several disparities when it comes to patient care, such as minorities are less likely to get diagnosed with cancer verses whites, patients with lower socioeconomic statuses are less likely to received diabetic services, and many more. In order to eliminate some there disparities it must first be recognized by others that it is a serious problem. These problems have been around for years; therefore the public must put pressure on the policymakers to promote change. In order

In 1988, an information system called the Composite Health Care System (CHCS) was formulated by a company called Science Applications International Corporations (SAIC). Science Application International Corporations won the contract worth $1.02 billion from the Military Health System to design, develop and implement CHCS. Although CHCS information system was designed in 1988, it wasn’t until 1993 that the system was introduced. Since 1993, CHCS has become the biggest medical information system for the military medial facilities. CHCS is the most essential part for the Department of Defense (DoD) for inpatient and outpatient. The system supports 143 military installation worldwide, 1,100 military clinics, and produce thousands of daily

For decades, a person’s socioeconomic status or SES has affected the healthcare that people receive due to race and “wealth”. This problem has plagued American society because of these factors leading to many receiving inadequate healthcare. All of these factors for someone’s SES has changed a lot in the healthcare domain that is unfair to many who are not the “ideal”. Due to this the perception, experiences with healthcare waver and are different between the stages of these SES’s. No matter the status of a person they should receive the same amount of care, treatment, and closer.

The increase of expenses - As politicians continue their dissension amongst each other, the situation is worsening in our healthcare system. According to the World Health Organization, to achieve universal health coverage, countries need a financial system that enables people access to all types of health services without incurring financial hardship (Carrin, Mathauer, Xu, & Evans, 2011). This idea would be the foundation of innovative ideas that the U.S. could reform its healthcare system, but too many ideas are sabotaging any valid efforts. In the mean time, the U.S. healthcare system continues to deal with issues such as the increasing uninsured Americans (over 49 million), expensive administrative procedures and the inability to measure the accuracy of quality of care, access of care, and the increasing healthcare spending and financing that limit our ability to efficient utilize resources.

Hospitals in the United States offer top quality care to its citizens but regrettably not everyone receives equal access to this care. There is an alarming difference between qualities of care received by some population groups relative to other population groups.

In the United States, there are many health insurance offered in the market for its citizens. Either through their employer or in the private market where coverage in not guaranteed and if you have a pre-existing condition, you will likely be denied. As private insurances soars, high premiums becoming unaffordable in the US, having the healthcare system failing to cover over 46 million Americans and leaving millions uninsured leading to bankruptcy (Palfreman, 2009). As most of the developed countries have removed the dependence of the health insurance

The healthcare system plays a key role in the economic stability of our country, as every year trillions are spent in attempt to combat disease and health issues that plaque humanity. As it makes up a significant amount of the expenditures in the economy, so the costs associated with health care of those in pain from illness and injury, including lost productivity, increased need of assistance in living and also the cost of death in some cases, is important to the economic stability and over all standard of living in our country. The key to economic prosperity is balancing the need for care with the costs of illness to keep as many people healthy and well without breaking the bank of collective society. The costs of healthcare have been increasingly problematic in recent years with so many issues surrounding the current system. With the “total health care spending in the United States expected to reach $4.8 trillion in 2021, up from $2.6 trillion in 2010 and $75 billion in 1970, meaning that health care spending will account for nearly 20 percent of gross domestic product (GDP), or one-fifth of the U.S. economy, by 2021” (Aetna). With this in mind it is apparent that as we look at the trillion-dollar industry of the medical community it seems that it needs to be a major focus of our nation as a whole and with the many issues come many creative solutions. First let us analyze the reasons behind the current cost and the major problems facing this industry and than discus what